Abstract
The report gives an overview of the debate about joint implementation (JI), and evaluates the possible role of JI under the framework convention on climate change. The potential for JI is evaluated on the basis of different examinations of the costs of reducing CO{sub 2}-emissions in some countries. Important issues such as possible participants, measuring and crediting of emission reductions, how to choose JI projects etc. are discussed. One chapter describes two pilot projects in Poland and Mexico, and the experiences from these projects are discussed. The organizing JI between the Nordic countries and between these countries and Eastern Europe is discussed. The report also give examples of possible sectors and fields for JI both in the Nordic countries and in Eastern Europe. 30 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.
Citation Formats
None.
Joint implementation of climatic measures; Felles implementering av klimatiltak.
Norway: N. p.,
1994.
Web.
None.
Joint implementation of climatic measures; Felles implementering av klimatiltak.
Norway.
None.
1994.
"Joint implementation of climatic measures; Felles implementering av klimatiltak."
Norway.
@misc{etde_10110646,
title = {Joint implementation of climatic measures; Felles implementering av klimatiltak}
author = {None}
abstractNote = {The report gives an overview of the debate about joint implementation (JI), and evaluates the possible role of JI under the framework convention on climate change. The potential for JI is evaluated on the basis of different examinations of the costs of reducing CO{sub 2}-emissions in some countries. Important issues such as possible participants, measuring and crediting of emission reductions, how to choose JI projects etc. are discussed. One chapter describes two pilot projects in Poland and Mexico, and the experiences from these projects are discussed. The organizing JI between the Nordic countries and between these countries and Eastern Europe is discussed. The report also give examples of possible sectors and fields for JI both in the Nordic countries and in Eastern Europe. 30 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.}
place = {Norway}
year = {1994}
month = {May}
}
title = {Joint implementation of climatic measures; Felles implementering av klimatiltak}
author = {None}
abstractNote = {The report gives an overview of the debate about joint implementation (JI), and evaluates the possible role of JI under the framework convention on climate change. The potential for JI is evaluated on the basis of different examinations of the costs of reducing CO{sub 2}-emissions in some countries. Important issues such as possible participants, measuring and crediting of emission reductions, how to choose JI projects etc. are discussed. One chapter describes two pilot projects in Poland and Mexico, and the experiences from these projects are discussed. The organizing JI between the Nordic countries and between these countries and Eastern Europe is discussed. The report also give examples of possible sectors and fields for JI both in the Nordic countries and in Eastern Europe. 30 refs., 7 figs., 3 tabs.}
place = {Norway}
year = {1994}
month = {May}
}