You need JavaScript to view this

OECD/NEA and CEC intercalibration and intercomparison programme for Radon

Abstract

Intercomparison of measurements of radon daughter activity concentration, unattached fraction and aerosol size distribution of radon daughters, was carried out by three of the reference laboratories: Australian Radiation Laboratory (ARL), US Department of Energy, Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) and US Department of Industry, Bureau of Mines (USBM), over the period March 17 to 21 1986, using the radon test chamber at the Australian Radiation Laboratory in Melbourne. The methodology, protocols and results for these measurements are described in detail. Results showed no systematic differences between the three laboratories, within the limits set by the counting statistics. In intercomparing methods for unattached fraction measurement, two of the reference laboratories (ARL and EML) used the single screen method. Good agreement was obtained between the two laboratories. EML and USBM also used graded screen devices for sizing these so-called unattached radon daughters. At the time of these measurements, the graded screen analysis methods available were of a preliminary nature. The ultrafine aerosol size distributions derived by EML and USBM show reasonable agreement in the position and magnitude of the derived peaks. Results of the measurements of the radon daughter aerosol size distributions between ARL, EML and USBM showed good agreement within the regions  More>>
Authors:
Solomon, S B; [1]  Knutson, E O; [2]  Holub, R F [3] 
  1. Australian Radiation Lab., Melbourne, VIC (Australia)
  2. US Department of Energy, New York, NY (United States). Environmental Measurements Lab.
  3. Bureau of Mines, Denver, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Jan 01, 1991
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
ARL-TR-097; CONF-8603268-
Reference Number:
SCA: 070207; PA: AIX-25:003021; EDB-94:012059; ERA-19:003362; NTS-94:014132; SN: 93001120458
Resource Relation:
Conference: Radon daughter aerosol workshop,Melbourne (Australia),17-21 Mar 1986; Other Information: PBD: Jan 1991
Subject:
07 ISOTOPES AND RADIATION SOURCES; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS; RADON; DAUGHTER PRODUCTS; ACTIVITY LEVELS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPILED DATA; COUNTING TECHNIQUES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; NEA; OECD; RADIOACTIVE AEROSOLS; US BUREAU OF MINES; US DOE; 070207; RADIATION SOURCE METROLOGY
OSTI ID:
10110311
Research Organizations:
Australian Radiation Lab., Melbourne, VIC (Australia)
Country of Origin:
Australia
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE94609135; TRN: AU9313501003021
Availability:
OSTI; NTIS (US Sales Only); INIS
Submitting Site:
INIS
Size:
33 p.
Announcement Date:
Jun 30, 2005

Citation Formats

Solomon, S B, Knutson, E O, and Holub, R F. OECD/NEA and CEC intercalibration and intercomparison programme for Radon. Australia: N. p., 1991. Web.
Solomon, S B, Knutson, E O, & Holub, R F. OECD/NEA and CEC intercalibration and intercomparison programme for Radon. Australia.
Solomon, S B, Knutson, E O, and Holub, R F. 1991. "OECD/NEA and CEC intercalibration and intercomparison programme for Radon." Australia.
@misc{etde_10110311,
title = {OECD/NEA and CEC intercalibration and intercomparison programme for Radon}
author = {Solomon, S B, Knutson, E O, and Holub, R F}
abstractNote = {Intercomparison of measurements of radon daughter activity concentration, unattached fraction and aerosol size distribution of radon daughters, was carried out by three of the reference laboratories: Australian Radiation Laboratory (ARL), US Department of Energy, Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML) and US Department of Industry, Bureau of Mines (USBM), over the period March 17 to 21 1986, using the radon test chamber at the Australian Radiation Laboratory in Melbourne. The methodology, protocols and results for these measurements are described in detail. Results showed no systematic differences between the three laboratories, within the limits set by the counting statistics. In intercomparing methods for unattached fraction measurement, two of the reference laboratories (ARL and EML) used the single screen method. Good agreement was obtained between the two laboratories. EML and USBM also used graded screen devices for sizing these so-called unattached radon daughters. At the time of these measurements, the graded screen analysis methods available were of a preliminary nature. The ultrafine aerosol size distributions derived by EML and USBM show reasonable agreement in the position and magnitude of the derived peaks. Results of the measurements of the radon daughter aerosol size distributions between ARL, EML and USBM showed good agreement within the regions of overlap of the instrument response. 16 refs., 13 tabs., 11 figs.}
place = {Australia}
year = {1991}
month = {Jan}
}