You need JavaScript to view this

The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis

Technical Report:

Abstract

Dirac`s large number hypothesis (LNH) states that the Eddington large numbers N{sub 1}({identical_to}{alpha}/Gm{sub e}m{sub p}{approx_equal}10{sup 39}), N{sub 2}({identical_to}m{sub e}/{alpha}H{approx_equal}10{sup 40}) and N{sub 3}({identical_to}4{pi}{rho}/3m{sub p}H{sup 3}{approx_equal}10{sup 80}) are not independent but related with each other. By reconsidering the meaning of the LNH, it is shown that not only the `dynamical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-N{sub 1}N{sub 2} but also the `geometrical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-(N{sub 2}){sup 2} holds so that the LNH may not be taken as a hypothesis but become the large number rule (LNR). (author).
Publication Date:
Oct 01, 1994
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
INS-1068
Reference Number:
SCA: 663110; PA: JPN-94:012188; EDB-95:025906; SN: 95001319996
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: Oct 1994
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; DIRAC COSMOLOGY; PARTICLE MODELS; FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS; UNIVERSE; COSMOLOGICAL MODELS; HUBBLE EFFECT; 663110; GENERAL AND AVERAGE PROPERTIES OF NUCLEI AND NUCLEAR ENERGY LEVELS
OSTI ID:
10109355
Research Organizations:
Tokyo Univ., Tanashi (Japan). Inst. for Nuclear Study
Country of Origin:
Japan
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE95737280; TRN: JP9412188
Availability:
OSTI; NTIS; INIS
Submitting Site:
JPN
Size:
10 p.
Announcement Date:
Jun 30, 2005

Technical Report:

Citation Formats

Terazawa, Hidezumi. The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis. Japan: N. p., 1994. Web.
Terazawa, Hidezumi. The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis. Japan.
Terazawa, Hidezumi. 1994. "The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis." Japan.
@misc{etde_10109355,
title = {The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis}
author = {Terazawa, Hidezumi}
abstractNote = {Dirac`s large number hypothesis (LNH) states that the Eddington large numbers N{sub 1}({identical_to}{alpha}/Gm{sub e}m{sub p}{approx_equal}10{sup 39}), N{sub 2}({identical_to}m{sub e}/{alpha}H{approx_equal}10{sup 40}) and N{sub 3}({identical_to}4{pi}{rho}/3m{sub p}H{sup 3}{approx_equal}10{sup 80}) are not independent but related with each other. By reconsidering the meaning of the LNH, it is shown that not only the `dynamical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-N{sub 1}N{sub 2} but also the `geometrical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-(N{sub 2}){sup 2} holds so that the LNH may not be taken as a hypothesis but become the large number rule (LNR). (author).}
place = {Japan}
year = {1994}
month = {Oct}
}