Abstract
Dirac`s large number hypothesis (LNH) states that the Eddington large numbers N{sub 1}({identical_to}{alpha}/Gm{sub e}m{sub p}{approx_equal}10{sup 39}), N{sub 2}({identical_to}m{sub e}/{alpha}H{approx_equal}10{sup 40}) and N{sub 3}({identical_to}4{pi}{rho}/3m{sub p}H{sup 3}{approx_equal}10{sup 80}) are not independent but related with each other. By reconsidering the meaning of the LNH, it is shown that not only the `dynamical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-N{sub 1}N{sub 2} but also the `geometrical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-(N{sub 2}){sup 2} holds so that the LNH may not be taken as a hypothesis but become the large number rule (LNR). (author).
Citation Formats
Terazawa, Hidezumi.
The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis.
Japan: N. p.,
1994.
Web.
Terazawa, Hidezumi.
The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis.
Japan.
Terazawa, Hidezumi.
1994.
"The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis."
Japan.
@misc{etde_10109355,
title = {The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis}
author = {Terazawa, Hidezumi}
abstractNote = {Dirac`s large number hypothesis (LNH) states that the Eddington large numbers N{sub 1}({identical_to}{alpha}/Gm{sub e}m{sub p}{approx_equal}10{sup 39}), N{sub 2}({identical_to}m{sub e}/{alpha}H{approx_equal}10{sup 40}) and N{sub 3}({identical_to}4{pi}{rho}/3m{sub p}H{sup 3}{approx_equal}10{sup 80}) are not independent but related with each other. By reconsidering the meaning of the LNH, it is shown that not only the `dynamical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-N{sub 1}N{sub 2} but also the `geometrical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-(N{sub 2}){sup 2} holds so that the LNH may not be taken as a hypothesis but become the large number rule (LNR). (author).}
place = {Japan}
year = {1994}
month = {Oct}
}
title = {The meaning of Dirac`s large number hypothesis}
author = {Terazawa, Hidezumi}
abstractNote = {Dirac`s large number hypothesis (LNH) states that the Eddington large numbers N{sub 1}({identical_to}{alpha}/Gm{sub e}m{sub p}{approx_equal}10{sup 39}), N{sub 2}({identical_to}m{sub e}/{alpha}H{approx_equal}10{sup 40}) and N{sub 3}({identical_to}4{pi}{rho}/3m{sub p}H{sup 3}{approx_equal}10{sup 80}) are not independent but related with each other. By reconsidering the meaning of the LNH, it is shown that not only the `dynamical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-N{sub 1}N{sub 2} but also the `geometrical` LNH relation of N{sub 3}-(N{sub 2}){sup 2} holds so that the LNH may not be taken as a hypothesis but become the large number rule (LNR). (author).}
place = {Japan}
year = {1994}
month = {Oct}
}