You need JavaScript to view this

Analysis of regional economic differential in Japan; Chiiki keizai kakusa no jittai bunseki

Technical Report:

Abstract

The composition of regional economic differential was analyzed to elucidate the development mechanism of regional economy. That composition was to be grasped from the four following facts: the regional income differential enlarged in the 1980`s. The main factor of income differential is the labor productivity differential. The income differential has been enlarging since a high working rate supporting the regional income started to break. Since 1975, the regional labor productivity differential has been enlarging in all the industries. The industries to which the enlargement of labor productivity differential was attributable in all industries were the manufacturing industry, wholesale and retail trade, and financial and insurance business. In those industries, the correlation of indirect department charge has been gradually heightening with the labor productivity, which is prescribed by the role division among regions. Mostly depending upon the final demand in the Kanto Region, the production in all regions strongly showed the foregoing trend in 1975 through 1985. The ability of connecting the final demand inside and outside the region with the production inside it is positively correlative with its labor productivity. 45 refs., 24 figs., 8 tabs.
Publication Date:
Mar 01, 1994
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
CRIE-Y-93008
Reference Number:
SCA: 290200; PA: NEDO-94:950290; EDB-95:021285; SN: 95001310853
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: Mar 1994
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; REGIONAL ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LABOR; PRODUCTIVITY; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; OCCUPATIONS; MANUFACTURERS; SALES; RETAILERS; FINANCING; INSURANCE; DEMAND FACTORS; 290200; ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY
OSTI ID:
10108118
Research Organizations:
Central Research Inst. of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo (Japan)
Country of Origin:
Japan
Language:
Japanese
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE95730182; TRN: 94:950290
Availability:
OSTI; NTIS; Available from Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1-6-1, Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Submitting Site:
NEDO
Size:
51 p.
Announcement Date:
Jun 30, 2005

Technical Report:

Citation Formats

Yamanaka, Y, and Baba, K. Analysis of regional economic differential in Japan; Chiiki keizai kakusa no jittai bunseki. Japan: N. p., 1994. Web.
Yamanaka, Y, & Baba, K. Analysis of regional economic differential in Japan; Chiiki keizai kakusa no jittai bunseki. Japan.
Yamanaka, Y, and Baba, K. 1994. "Analysis of regional economic differential in Japan; Chiiki keizai kakusa no jittai bunseki." Japan.
@misc{etde_10108118,
title = {Analysis of regional economic differential in Japan; Chiiki keizai kakusa no jittai bunseki}
author = {Yamanaka, Y, and Baba, K}
abstractNote = {The composition of regional economic differential was analyzed to elucidate the development mechanism of regional economy. That composition was to be grasped from the four following facts: the regional income differential enlarged in the 1980`s. The main factor of income differential is the labor productivity differential. The income differential has been enlarging since a high working rate supporting the regional income started to break. Since 1975, the regional labor productivity differential has been enlarging in all the industries. The industries to which the enlargement of labor productivity differential was attributable in all industries were the manufacturing industry, wholesale and retail trade, and financial and insurance business. In those industries, the correlation of indirect department charge has been gradually heightening with the labor productivity, which is prescribed by the role division among regions. Mostly depending upon the final demand in the Kanto Region, the production in all regions strongly showed the foregoing trend in 1975 through 1985. The ability of connecting the final demand inside and outside the region with the production inside it is positively correlative with its labor productivity. 45 refs., 24 figs., 8 tabs.}
place = {Japan}
year = {1994}
month = {Mar}
}