You need JavaScript to view this

Comparison of dynamic and static material properties for predicted strains on accidental cask loads

Abstract

In order to evaluate the stress intensity factor, the flaw depth and the nominal stress must be ascertained. For numerical calculations of stress values with the finite element (FE) method the code has to be verified. For this purpose, the drop test II with a cylindrical cask was selected. The test data were compared with results of two calculations with different material models. The results of the calculation with the material model based on realistic material parameters show very good agreement with the experiment. The material model based on minimum material specifications is not suitable for FE calculations. (author).
Authors:
Voelzer, W; Neser, A; [1]  Schreiber, D; Hueggenberg, R [2] 
  1. Wissenschaftlich-Technische Ingenieurberatung, Juelich (Germany)
  2. Gesellschaft fuer Nuklearservice, Essen (Germany)
Publication Date:
Sep 01, 1995
Product Type:
Journal Article
Report Number:
CONF-9410134-
Reference Number:
SCA: 420204; PA: AIX-26:063427; EDB-95:131243; SN: 95001458048
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transport; Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 2-3; Conference: Brittle fracture safety assessment, Krefeld (Germany), 27-28 Oct 1994; Other Information: PBD: 1995
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CATEGORIES; CASKS; FRACTURE PROPERTIES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE MECHANICS; IMPACT TESTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS; VERIFICATION
OSTI ID:
100505
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: IJRTER; ISSN 0957-476X; TRN: GB9501344063427
Submitting Site:
GBN
Size:
pp. 139-143
Announcement Date:
Oct 04, 1995

Citation Formats

Voelzer, W, Neser, A, Schreiber, D, and Hueggenberg, R. Comparison of dynamic and static material properties for predicted strains on accidental cask loads. United Kingdom: N. p., 1995. Web.
Voelzer, W, Neser, A, Schreiber, D, & Hueggenberg, R. Comparison of dynamic and static material properties for predicted strains on accidental cask loads. United Kingdom.
Voelzer, W, Neser, A, Schreiber, D, and Hueggenberg, R. 1995. "Comparison of dynamic and static material properties for predicted strains on accidental cask loads." United Kingdom.
@misc{etde_100505,
title = {Comparison of dynamic and static material properties for predicted strains on accidental cask loads}
author = {Voelzer, W, Neser, A, Schreiber, D, and Hueggenberg, R}
abstractNote = {In order to evaluate the stress intensity factor, the flaw depth and the nominal stress must be ascertained. For numerical calculations of stress values with the finite element (FE) method the code has to be verified. For this purpose, the drop test II with a cylindrical cask was selected. The test data were compared with results of two calculations with different material models. The results of the calculation with the material model based on realistic material parameters show very good agreement with the experiment. The material model based on minimum material specifications is not suitable for FE calculations. (author).}
journal = {International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transport}
issue = {2-3}
volume = {6}
journal type = {AC}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {1995}
month = {Sep}
}