Where should the measures to reduce sulphur deposition be allocated. Mihin rikkipaeaestoevaehennykset kannattaa kohdentaa Lehtilae, A [Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, Otaniemi (Finland). Ydinvoimatekniikan Lab.] 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; COST; SULFUR DIOXIDE; ATMOSPHERIC PRECIPITATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DEPOSITION; FINLAND; FORESTS; NITROGEN OXIDES; TRANSFRONTIER POLLUTION; USSR; ASIA; CHALCOGENIDES; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; SCANDINAVIA; SIMULATION; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SULFUR OXIDES; 290200* - Energy Planning & Policy- Economics & Sociology; 540120 - Environment, Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-) In order to reduce sulphur deposition in the most cos-effective way, the atmospheric transfer of emissions and the costs of different emission reduction measures must be taken into account. Recent studies performed at the Technical Recearch Centre of Finland in collaboration with IIASA and Finnish Meteorological Institute indicate that the most cost-effective measures can be taken in southem Finland and in the Kola Peninsula in the U.S.S.R. Other Soviet nearby regions have a high priority, too. Significant reductions in deposition levels can, however, be achieved only through marked abatement of emissions in central and eastern Europe. Finland 1991-01-01 Finnish Journal Article Journal Name: Ilmansuojelu-Uutiset; (Finland); Journal Volume: 14:2 Medium: X; Size: Pages: 13-16 https://doi.org/ [] 14:2 Journal ID: ISSN 0786-5899; CODEN: ILUUE FI; FI-91-003388; EDB-92-002220 2010-12-30 6205715