<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
     <records>
	  <record>
	       <dc:title>Pathways for hydrogen infrastructure development in China: Integrated assessment for vehicle fuels and a case study of Beijing</dc:title>
	       <dc:creator>Chang, Le; Li, Zheng; Gao, Dan; Huang, He; Ni, Weidou [Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua BP Clean Energy Research and Education Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 (China)]</dc:creator>
	       <dc:subject>08 HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN; COAL; CHINA; METHANOL; URBAN AREAS; VEHICLES; LIFE CYCLE; CHARGES; DISTRIBUTION; GRIDS; TANKS; TOOLS; ACCOUNTING; CARRIERS; COST; DELIVERY; GROWTH</dc:subject>
	       <dc:subjectRelated></dc:subjectRelated>
	       <dc:description>This paper analyzes the technical, economic, and environmental characteristics of different pathways for supplying hydrogen to vehicles in China. A life-cycle accounting of ''well-to-tank'' hydrogen delivery for 11 different infrastructure pathways reveals different relative economic costs and environmental benefits. Coal-derived methanol as a hydrogen carrier appears particularly promising for China from an economic standpoint. The analysis considers three different infrastructure models: (1) ''point-to-point'' distribution from well to fueling station; (2) an ''idealized city model'' with radial and network distribution within a city grid; and (3) a model of Beijing infrastructure growth that evolves over time. The analytical results, the infrastructure models, and the practical case of Beijing provide policy-makers with new tools for hydrogen development strategies. (author)</dc:description>
	       <dcq:publisher></dcq:publisher>
	       <dcq:publisherResearch></dcq:publisherResearch>
	       <dcq:publisherAvailability>Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.04.003</dcq:publisherAvailability>
	       <dcq:publisherSponsor></dcq:publisherSponsor>
	       <dcq:publisherCountry>United Kingdom</dcq:publisherCountry>
		   <dc:contributingOrganizations></dc:contributingOrganizations>
	       <dc:date>2007-11-15</dc:date>
	       <dc:language>English</dc:language>
	       <dc:type>Journal Article</dc:type>
	       <dcq:typeQualifier></dcq:typeQualifier>
	       <dc:relation>Journal Name: Energy (Oxford); Journal Volume: 32; Journal Issue: 11; Other Information: Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved</dc:relation>
	       <dc:coverage></dc:coverage>
	       <dc:format>Medium: X; Size: page(s) 2023-2037</dc:format>
	       <dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2007.04.003</dc:doi>
	       <dc:identifier></dc:identifier>
		   <dc:journalName>[]</dc:journalName>
		   <dc:journalIssue>11</dc:journalIssue>
		   <dc:journalVolume>32</dc:journalVolume>
	       <dc:identifierReport></dc:identifierReport>
	       <dcq:identifierDOEcontract></dcq:identifierDOEcontract>
	       <dc:identifierOther>Journal ID: ISSN 0360-5442; ENEYDS; TRN: GB07V3097</dc:identifierOther>
	       <dc:source>GB</dc:source>
	       <dc:rights></dc:rights>
	       <dc:dateEntry>2010-01-01</dc:dateEntry>
	       <dc:dateAdded></dc:dateAdded>
	       <dc:ostiId>20968851</dc:ostiId>
	       <dcq:identifier-purl></dcq:identifier-purl>
	  </record>
     </records>
</rdf:RDF>