<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
     <records>
	  <record>
	       <dc:title>Do radiographic indices of distal radius fracture reduction predict outcomes in older adults receiving conservative treatment?</dc:title>
	       <dc:creator>Jaremko, J L [Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Lambert, R G.W. [Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Rowe, B H [Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Johnson, J A [Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]; Majumdar, S R [Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Canada)]</dc:creator>
	       <dc:subject>62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; BONE FRACTURES; IMAGES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; THERAPY</dc:subject>
	       <dc:subjectRelated></dc:subjectRelated>
	       <dc:description>Aim: To investigate whether radiographic deformities suggesting inadequate reduction would be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients over 50 years of age (n = 74) with non-operatively managed distal radius fractures were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. They had radiographs at cast removal ({approx}6 weeks) and completed DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), SF-12 (health-related quality of life), and satisfaction surveys 6-months post-fracture. A reference-standard musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded to outcomes status, measured palmar (dorsal) tilt, radial angle, radial height, ulnar height, and intra-articular step and gap. Radiographic indices were correlated to each other and to the various patient-reported outcomes in univariate and multivariate regression analyses. DASH score was the primary study outcome. Results: Of the cohort studied (n = 74, mean age 68.5 years, primarily white women), 71% had at least one 'unacceptable' radiographic deformity by traditional criteria. Acceptable reduction varied from 60-99% depending on which single index was reported, and 44% of patients had more than two indices reported as unacceptable. Despite these radiographic findings, 6-months post-reduction, self-reported disability was low (DASH = 24 {+-} 17), health-related quality of life was near normal, and 72% were satisfied with their care. No radiographic index of wrist deformity (alone or in combination) was significantly correlated to any of the patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: Self-reported outcomes in older adults with conservatively managed wrist fractures were not related to the 'acceptability' of radiographic fracture reduction. The proportion of acceptable reductions varied by 40% depending on which index was reported. Consequently, detailed reporting of these indices in older adults with distal radius fracture may be inefficient or perhaps even unnecessary.</dc:description>
	       <dcq:publisher></dcq:publisher>
	       <dcq:publisherResearch></dcq:publisherResearch>
	       <dcq:publisherAvailability></dcq:publisherAvailability>
	       <dcq:publisherSponsor></dcq:publisherSponsor>
	       <dcq:publisherCountry>United Kingdom</dcq:publisherCountry>
		   <dc:contributingOrganizations></dc:contributingOrganizations>
	       <dc:date>2007-01-15</dc:date>
	       <dc:language>English</dc:language>
	       <dc:type>Journal Article</dc:type>
	       <dcq:typeQualifier></dcq:typeQualifier>
	       <dc:relation>Journal Name: Clinical Radiology; Journal Volume: 62; Journal Issue: 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.013; PII: S0009-9260(06)00304-7; Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)</dc:relation>
	       <dc:coverage></dc:coverage>
	       <dc:format>Medium: X; Size: page(s) 65-72</dc:format>
	       <dc:doi>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.013</dc:doi>
	       <dc:identifier></dc:identifier>
		   <dc:journalName>[]</dc:journalName>
		   <dc:journalIssue>1</dc:journalIssue>
		   <dc:journalVolume>62</dc:journalVolume>
	       <dc:identifierReport></dc:identifierReport>
	       <dcq:identifierDOEcontract></dcq:identifierDOEcontract>
	       <dc:identifierOther>Journal ID: ISSN 0009-9260; CLRAAG; TRN: GB07R1097012894</dc:identifierOther>
	       <dc:source>GBN</dc:source>
	       <dc:rights></dc:rights>
	       <dc:dateEntry>2010-12-31</dc:dateEntry>
	       <dc:dateAdded></dc:dateAdded>
	       <dc:ostiId>20839637</dc:ostiId>
	       <dcq:identifier-purl></dcq:identifier-purl>
	  </record>
     </records>
</rdf:RDF>