Model predictive control of parametric excited pitch-surge modes in wave energy converters
Abstract
A parametric excitation dynamic model is used for a three degrees-of-freedom (3-DOF) wave energy converter. Since the heave motion is uncoupled from the pitch and surge modes, the pitch-surge equations of motion can be treated as a linear time varying system, or a linear system with parametric excitation. In such case the parametric exciting frequency can be tuned to twice the natural frequency of the system for higher energy harvesting. A parametric excited 3-DOF wave energy converter can harvest more power, for both regular and irregular waves, compared to the linear 3-DOF. For example, in a Bretschneider wave, the harvested energy in the three modes is about 3.8 times the energy harvested in the heave mode alone; while the same device produces about 3.1 times the heave mode energy when using a linear 3-DOF model.
- Inventors:
- Issue Date:
- Research Org.:
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI (United States); South Dakota Board of Regents, Pierre, SD (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1576305
- Patent Number(s):
- 10415537
- Application Number:
- 15/837,885
- Assignee:
- National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Albuquerque, NM); Michigan Technological University (Houghton, MI); South Dakota Board of Regents (Pierre, SD)
- Patent Classifications (CPCs):
-
F - MECHANICAL ENGINEERING F05 - INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04 F05B - INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO MACHINES OR ENGINES OTHER THAN NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, TO WIND MOTORS, TO NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS, AND TO GENERATING COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OF HIGH PRESSURE OR HIGH VELOCITY
G - PHYSICS G06 - COMPUTING G06F - ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- DOE Contract Number:
- NA0003525
- Resource Type:
- Patent
- Resource Relation:
- Patent File Date: 2017 Dec 11
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER; 42 ENGINEERING
Citation Formats
Abdelkhalik, Ossama, Robinett, III, Rush D., Zou, Shangyan, Wilson, David G., Bacelli, Giorgio, Korde, Umesh, and Coe, Ryan G. Model predictive control of parametric excited pitch-surge modes in wave energy converters. United States: N. p., 2019.
Web.
Abdelkhalik, Ossama, Robinett, III, Rush D., Zou, Shangyan, Wilson, David G., Bacelli, Giorgio, Korde, Umesh, & Coe, Ryan G. Model predictive control of parametric excited pitch-surge modes in wave energy converters. United States.
Abdelkhalik, Ossama, Robinett, III, Rush D., Zou, Shangyan, Wilson, David G., Bacelli, Giorgio, Korde, Umesh, and Coe, Ryan G. Tue .
"Model predictive control of parametric excited pitch-surge modes in wave energy converters". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1576305.
@article{osti_1576305,
title = {Model predictive control of parametric excited pitch-surge modes in wave energy converters},
author = {Abdelkhalik, Ossama and Robinett, III, Rush D. and Zou, Shangyan and Wilson, David G. and Bacelli, Giorgio and Korde, Umesh and Coe, Ryan G.},
abstractNote = {A parametric excitation dynamic model is used for a three degrees-of-freedom (3-DOF) wave energy converter. Since the heave motion is uncoupled from the pitch and surge modes, the pitch-surge equations of motion can be treated as a linear time varying system, or a linear system with parametric excitation. In such case the parametric exciting frequency can be tuned to twice the natural frequency of the system for higher energy harvesting. A parametric excited 3-DOF wave energy converter can harvest more power, for both regular and irregular waves, compared to the linear 3-DOF. For example, in a Bretschneider wave, the harvested energy in the three modes is about 3.8 times the energy harvested in the heave mode alone; while the same device produces about 3.1 times the heave mode energy when using a linear 3-DOF model.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {9}
}
Works referenced in this record:
Method and apparatus to stabilize an offshore platform
patent, July 1990
- Karsan, Demir I.; Demirbilek, Zeki
- US Patent Document 4,938,630
Nonlinear active control of dynamical systems
patent, October 2003
- Nayfeh, Ali Hasan; Mook, Dean Tritschler; Henry, Ryan James
- US Patent Document 6,631,300
Wave energy converter (WEC) with heave plates
patent-application, November 2007
- Bull, Diana; Gerber, James; Powers, William
- US Patent Application 11/796852; 20070266704
Controller for a wave energy converter
patent, September 2015
- Wilson, David G.; Bull, Diana L.; Robinett, III, Rush D.
- US Patent Document 9,140,231
Apparatus for single point mooring
patent, August 1984
- Pedersen, Kristen I.
- US Patent Document 4,468,205
Apparatus for converting wave energy into electric power
patent, August 2011
- Clement, Alain; Babarit, Aurlien; Duclos, Galle
- US Patent Document 7,989,975
Multi-Resonant Feedback Control of a Single Degree-of-Freedom Wave Energy Converter
patent-application, June 2018
- Wilson, David G.; Robinett, III, Rush D.; Abdelkhalik, Ossama
- US Patent Application 15/830752; 20180164754
Apparatus for generating rotary motion from rise and fall motion of waves
patent, March 1991
- Marx, Robert P.
- US Patent Document 4,996,840
Open sea transfer of fluids
patent, September 1989
- Dodge, John W.; Rabett, Alan R.; Mottram, Dennis J.
- US Patent Document 4,867,211
Advanced wave energy converter control
patent-application, June 2010
- Gerber, James S.
- US Patent Application 12/455094; 20100148504
Devices for extracting energy from wave power
patent, February 1980
- Moody, George W.; Meir, Robert A.
- US Patent Document 4,189,918
Semi-submersible offshore platform with articulated buoyancy
patent, July 1995
- Grinius, Victor G.; Lynch, Arthur C.
- US Patent Document 5,435,262
Wave measuring buoy
patent, September 1980
- LeBlanc, Lester R.; Middleton, Foster H.
- US Patent Document 4,220,044