GeoRePORT 2.0

Kolker, Amanda; Witter, Erik; Rubin, Rachel; Young, Katherine; Levine, Aaron

doi:10.15121/1856767

Title: GeoRePORT 2.0

Dataset
Other Related Research

Abstract

Version 2 of the GeoRePORT protocols and excel-based reporting tools. Software allows users to grade the geologic, technical, and socio-economic conditions at a geothermal resource location for both electricity generation and direct-use. Includes tool and protocols for: * Geologic Assessment Tool * Technical Assessment Tool * Socio-Economic Assessment Tool * International Socio-Economic Assessment Tool In addition, GeoRePORT now includes a Resource Size Assessment tool and protocol.

Authors:: Kolker, Amanda; Witter, Erik; Rubin, Rachel; Young, Katherine; Levine, Aaron

Publication Date:: 2022-03-25

Other Number(s):: 1372

DOE Contract Number:: 37036

Research Org.:: USDOE Geothermal Data Repository (United States); National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Geothermal Technologies Program (EE-4G)

Collaborations:: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Subject:: 15 Geothermal Energy

Keywords:: geothermal; energy; Socio-Economic; Permitting; Land Access; Resource Size; tool; economic; socioeconomic; geologic; resource; resource assesment; reporting; reporting tools; tools; protocol; direct use; power generation; technical; assessment

Geolocation:: 75.0714,-53.8316|13.518,-53.8316|13.518,-167.7267|75.0714,-167.7267|75.0714,-53.8316

OSTI Identifier:: 1856767

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.15121/1856767

Project Location:

Citation Formats


                    Kolker, Amanda, Witter, Erik, Rubin, Rachel, Young, Katherine, and Levine, Aaron. GeoRePORT 2.0.  United States: N. p., 2022. 
        Web.  doi:10.15121/1856767.

Copy to clipboard


                    Kolker, Amanda, Witter, Erik, Rubin, Rachel, Young, Katherine, & Levine, Aaron. GeoRePORT 2.0.  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1856767

Copy to clipboard


                    Kolker, Amanda, Witter, Erik, Rubin, Rachel, Young, Katherine, and Levine, Aaron. 2022.  
"GeoRePORT 2.0".  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1856767.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1856767. Pub date:Fri Mar 25 00:00:00 EDT 2022

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1856767,

  title        = {GeoRePORT 2.0},

  author       = {Kolker, Amanda and Witter, Erik and Rubin, Rachel and Young, Katherine and Levine, Aaron},

  abstractNote = {Version 2 of the GeoRePORT protocols and excel-based reporting tools. Software allows users to grade the geologic, technical, and socio-economic conditions at a geothermal resource location for both electricity generation and direct-use. Includes tool and protocols for: * Geologic Assessment Tool * Technical Assessment Tool * Socio-Economic Assessment Tool * International Socio-Economic Assessment Tool In addition, GeoRePORT now includes a Resource Size Assessment tool and protocol.},

  doi          = {10.15121/1856767},

  journal      = {},

  number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2022},

  month        = {3}

}

Copy to clipboard

Dataset:

View Dataset

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15121/1856767

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in DOE Data Explorer and OSTI.GOV collections:

GeoRePORT Input Spreadsheet

Dataset St. Onge, Melinda

The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Tool (GeoRePORT) was developed as a way to distill large amounts of geothermal project data into an objective, reportable data set that can be used to communicate with experts and non-experts. GeoRePORT summarizes (1) resource grade and certainty and (2) project readiness. This Excel file allows users to easily navigate through the resource grade attributes, using drop-down menus to pick grades and project readiness, and then easily print and share the summary with others. This spreadsheet is the first draft, for which we are soliciting expert feedback. The spreadsheet will be updated basedmore »« less
Play Fairway Analysis Retrospective GeoRePORTs

Dataset Rhodes, Greg

NREL, as part of the Play Fairway Analysis (PFA) Retrospective and with assistance from PFA PIs, completed GeoRePORTs for the sites identified in Phases 1&2 of the DOE PFA projects. The GeoRePORT (geothermal resource portfolio optimization and reporting technique) uses two factors to describe a specific project; grade and project readiness level. Grade describes the quality or potential of a project while project readiness level shows the progress of research and development. The categories that factor into the total grades and readiness levels are Geological, Technical, and Socio-Economic.
GeoRePORT Case Studies - Coso, WSMR, Dixie Valley, and Chena Hot Springs

Dataset Kolker, Amanda ; Young, Katherine ; Dwyer, Stephanie ; ...

The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. Inmore »« less
GeoRePORT Protocol and Spreadsheet Template

Dataset Kolker, Amanda

The Geothermal Resource Portfolio Optimization and Reporting Technique (GeoRePORT) was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office to assist in identifying and pursuing long-term investment strategies through the development of a resource reporting protocol. GeoRePORT provides scientists and nonscientists a comprehensive and quantitative means of reporting: (1) features intrinsic to geothermal sites (project grade) and (2) maturity of the development (project readiness). Because geothermal feasibility is not determined by any single factor (e.g., temperature, permeability, permitting), a site?s project grade and readiness are evaluated on 12 attributes pertaining to geological, technical, or socio-economic feasibility. Inmore »« less
XSAPR CMAC 2.0 level c1 data.

Dataset Sherman, Zachary ; Collis, Scott ; Jackson, Robert

NSA X-SAPR radar data processed with Corrected Moments in Antenna Coordinates (CMAC 2.0)

Similar Records