skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Run-08 pC polarization analysis - October 16, 2008

Abstract

In this note we will discuss the analysis of RHIC run 08 pC data that were collected during February 14 - March 10, 2008. An analysis method that is similar to Run 05 and Run 06 was adopted for Run 08 analysis (except few minor changes, which are described below). A detailed analysis note and a NIM article that describe the pC analysis procedure (for run 05 and run 06) can be found elsewhere. In brief, the analysis consists of calibrating the detectors, determining energy corrections ('dead layers'), determining good runs and extracting the polarization from data.

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
Doe - Office Of Science
OSTI Identifier:
957467
Report Number(s):
BNL-82292-2009-IR
KB0202011; TRN: US1000403
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC02-98CH10886
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; 97 MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING; POLARIZATION; DATA ANALYSIS; BROOKHAVEN RHIC

Citation Formats

Dharmawardane,V., Bazilevsky,A., Bunce, G., Gill, R., Huang, H., Makdisi, Y., Nakagawa, I., Morozov, B., Okada, H., Sivertz, M., Zelenski, A., Alekseev, I., and Svirida, D. Run-08 pC polarization analysis - October 16, 2008. United States: N. p., 2009. Web. doi:10.2172/957467.
Dharmawardane,V., Bazilevsky,A., Bunce, G., Gill, R., Huang, H., Makdisi, Y., Nakagawa, I., Morozov, B., Okada, H., Sivertz, M., Zelenski, A., Alekseev, I., & Svirida, D. Run-08 pC polarization analysis - October 16, 2008. United States. doi:10.2172/957467.
Dharmawardane,V., Bazilevsky,A., Bunce, G., Gill, R., Huang, H., Makdisi, Y., Nakagawa, I., Morozov, B., Okada, H., Sivertz, M., Zelenski, A., Alekseev, I., and Svirida, D. Sun . "Run-08 pC polarization analysis - October 16, 2008". United States. doi:10.2172/957467. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/957467.
@article{osti_957467,
title = {Run-08 pC polarization analysis - October 16, 2008},
author = {Dharmawardane,V. and Bazilevsky,A. and Bunce, G. and Gill, R. and Huang, H. and Makdisi, Y. and Nakagawa, I. and Morozov, B. and Okada, H. and Sivertz, M. and Zelenski, A. and Alekseev, I. and Svirida, D.},
abstractNote = {In this note we will discuss the analysis of RHIC run 08 pC data that were collected during February 14 - March 10, 2008. An analysis method that is similar to Run 05 and Run 06 was adopted for Run 08 analysis (except few minor changes, which are described below). A detailed analysis note and a NIM article that describe the pC analysis procedure (for run 05 and run 06) can be found elsewhere. In brief, the analysis consists of calibrating the detectors, determining energy corrections ('dead layers'), determining good runs and extracting the polarization from data.},
doi = {10.2172/957467},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2009},
month = {Sun Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2009}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The RHIC proton beam polarization has a strong dependence on intensity in Run 2008, whereas the dependence is almost absent in Run 2006. Meanwhile, the RHIC beam transverse emittance also has a dependence on intensity in Run 2008, but little in Run 2006. Using the emittance measurement at the AGS IPM and the BtA multiwires, the source of this difference between 2006 and 2008 runs is traced to the Booster. It is found that at least the degree of the vertical scraping in the Booster is different in 2006 and 2008. The effect of this scraping for the RHIC beammore » emittance and polarization is studied.« less
  • Analysis of PC polarimeter data at {radical}s = 200 and 500 GeV from Run9 is presented. Final polarization results, fill-by-fill, for blue and yellow beams, as to be used by RHIC experiments (in collisions) are released and collected in http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/cnipol/pubdocs/Run09Offline/. Global relative systematic uncertainties {delta}P/P (to be considered as correlated from fill to fill) are 4.7% for 100 GeV beams, and 8.3% (12.1%) for blue (yellow) 250 GeV beams. For a product of two beam polarizations P{sub B} {center_dot} P{sub Y} (used in double spin asymmetry measurements) the relative uncertainty {delta}(P{sub B} {center_dot} P{sub Y})/(P{sub B} {center_dot} P{sub Y}) 8.8%more » for 100 GeV beams and 18.5% for 250 GeV beams. For the average between two beam polarization (P{sub B} + P{sub Y})/2 (used in single spin asymmetry measurements, when data from two polarized beams are combined) the relative uncertainty is 4.4% for 100 GeV beams and 9.2% for 250 GeV beams. Larger uncertainties for 250 GeV beams relate to significant rate related systematic effects experienced in the first part of Run9 (due to thicker targets used and smaller trans. beam size at higher beam energy).« less
  • The TRAC-PD2 code version was used to analyze CCTF Test C1-16 (Run 025). The results indicate that the core heater rod temperatures, the liquid mass in the vessel, and differential pressures in the primary loop are predicted well, but the void fraction distribution in the core and water accumulation in the upper plenum are not in good agreement with the data.