skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Winter driving demands extra checks and extra caution

Abstract

Article for the Tri-Cities Area Journal of Business on winter driving tips for business owners and their employees.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
922180
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-53277
TRN: US200803%%212
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Tri-Cities Area Journal of Business, 6(1):19; Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 1
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; VEHICLES; MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATORS; SEASONAL VARIATIONS; safety

Citation Formats

Schlender, Michael H. Winter driving demands extra checks and extra caution. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
Schlender, Michael H. Winter driving demands extra checks and extra caution. United States.
Schlender, Michael H. Mon . "Winter driving demands extra checks and extra caution". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_922180,
title = {Winter driving demands extra checks and extra caution},
author = {Schlender, Michael H.},
abstractNote = {Article for the Tri-Cities Area Journal of Business on winter driving tips for business owners and their employees.},
doi = {},
journal = {Tri-Cities Area Journal of Business, 6(1):19},
number = 1,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2007},
month = {Mon Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2007}
}
  • Unprecedented governmental concern over protecting public health and the environment from the negative effects of industrial operations has created the need for improved risk assessment techniques. Various methods of risk-benefit analysis in the area of municipal sludge management are discussed. While risk-benefit analyses can improve both the efficiency and effectiveness of sludge management policy formation, they do not consider intrinsically incorporated chance elements, such as excessive heavy metal levels in sludge or the functional failure of sludge processing systems. Sludge management decision-makers must be aware of the inherent limitations of risk-benefit analyses.
  • This paper reports that caution and careful planning are the watchwords for operators in their approach to horizontal drilling for oil in Puper Cretaceous Niobrara chalk in Colorado and Wyoming. Despite its geologic age equivalence with the Austin chalk of southeastern Texas, the formation has not attracted the same degree of attention or yielded as stunning results as the Austin chalk. Little is yet known about the precise reasons for its sporadic productivity; the exact nature of the fracture system(s) within it; the source and migration history of its oil(s); or the deeper structures and structural trends with which productivitymore » appears associated. Niobrara underlies an area larger than that underlain by the Austin chalk, but Niobrara horizontal drilling so far has proceeded at a guarded pace.« less
  • The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology is discussed in detail. Problems in using IFIM are identified and discussed. Among them are: IFIM assumes that the population levels of various fish species are directly related to the amount of habitat, but this relationship has been difficult to demonstrate. Also, IFIM does not address food availability. In situations where fish are limited by food supply and food supply is not related to streamflow, then the results of IFIM have little relevance. Better habitat models are needed. Only by developing project-specific habitat models can one expect to achieve highly realistic and predictive results frommore » IFIM. If these and other shortcomings of the technique are taken into account, IFIM can guide the developer and agencies to a cost-effective mitigation agreement which will maximize benefits to fish while minimizing the amount of water lost to development. The Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) is also discussed. The position is taken that HEP is vulnerable to manipulation; team members can push for decisions that will bias the study toward a desired result. Many of the habitat models used as part of HEP have not been field-tested to determine how accurately they predict long-term population levels.« less