skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: DEVELOPMENT OF HFE SECTIONS OF DG-1145.

Abstract

For the licensing of the current fleet of commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) used two key documents, NUREG-0800 and Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.70. RG 1.70 provided guidance to applicants on the contents needed in their Safety Analysis Reports (SARs) submitted as part of their application to construct or operate an NPP. NUREG-0800, the NRC Standard Review Plan (SRP), provides guidance to the NRR staff reviewers on performing their safety reviews of these applications. As part of the preparation for a new wave of improved NPP designs the NRC is in the process of updating the SRP and is also developing a new RG designated as draft RG or DG-1145, ''Combined License Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition).'' This will eventually become RG 1.206 and will take the place of RG 1.70. This will provide guidance for combined license (COL) applicants, as well as for other 10CFR Part 52 variations that are permitted.

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
American Nuclear Society
OSTI Identifier:
909946
Report Number(s):
BNL-77808-2007-CP
R&D Project: 15373, 10595; 720-15-171-107; TRN: US0704025
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC02-98CH10886
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: ANS 2007 ANNUAL MEETING; BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS; 20070624 through 20070628
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; LICENSE APPLICATIONS; LICENSING; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; REGULATORY GUIDES; SAFETY; SAFETY ANALYSIS

Citation Formats

HIGGINS,J.C., OHARA, J.M., and BONGARRA, J. DEVELOPMENT OF HFE SECTIONS OF DG-1145.. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
HIGGINS,J.C., OHARA, J.M., & BONGARRA, J. DEVELOPMENT OF HFE SECTIONS OF DG-1145.. United States.
HIGGINS,J.C., OHARA, J.M., and BONGARRA, J. Mon . "DEVELOPMENT OF HFE SECTIONS OF DG-1145.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/909946.
@article{osti_909946,
title = {DEVELOPMENT OF HFE SECTIONS OF DG-1145.},
author = {HIGGINS,J.C. and OHARA, J.M. and BONGARRA, J.},
abstractNote = {For the licensing of the current fleet of commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) used two key documents, NUREG-0800 and Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.70. RG 1.70 provided guidance to applicants on the contents needed in their Safety Analysis Reports (SARs) submitted as part of their application to construct or operate an NPP. NUREG-0800, the NRC Standard Review Plan (SRP), provides guidance to the NRR staff reviewers on performing their safety reviews of these applications. As part of the preparation for a new wave of improved NPP designs the NRC is in the process of updating the SRP and is also developing a new RG designated as draft RG or DG-1145, ''Combined License Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (LWR Edition).'' This will eventually become RG 1.206 and will take the place of RG 1.70. This will provide guidance for combined license (COL) applicants, as well as for other 10CFR Part 52 variations that are permitted.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Mar 26 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Mon Mar 26 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The Human Factors Engineering (HFE) Design Team within a concurrent engineering environment has a very difficult task in integrating HFE in the design processes of Systems, Structures and Components (SSC). In this ever-changing environment, where layouts, operator and maintenance staff tasks and roles change frequently, it is imperative to have access to tools with which information can be gathered and designs evaluated swiftly and precisely. This paper describes a process that is linked to a number of tools which the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) HFE Design Team uses to gather functional, task, layout, operational and maintenance information. The processmore » is described step by step, with inputs to, outputs from and the tools used to capture, evaluate and control information within the HFE design. (authors)« less
  • Catalysis by supported clusters: chemisorption, decomposition, and catalytic properties in Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis of Fe/sub 3/(CO)/sub 12/, (HFe/sub 3/(CO)/sub 11/)/sup -/, and F(CO)/sub 5/ supported on highly divided oxides, such as large-surface-area g- or ..gamma..-Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/, MgO, SiO/sub 2/, and La/sub 2/O/sub 3/, to 1-2 3< by wt Fe were studied by coupling activity and selectivity measurements in F-T tests with ferromagnetic resonance and Moessbauer spectroscopy of the catalysts and gas-phase analysis of the products of thermal decomposition of the supported carbonyls. In F-T synthesis at 533/sup 0/-543/sup 0/K, all the catalysts studied showed high selectivities for hydrocarbons (43-100%)more » and olefins (43-69%), with a sharp maximum, especially over Fe/sub 3/(CO)/sub 12//Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/, for C/sub 2/-C/sub 3/ olefins, but the catalytic activities were low. The high olefin selectivities were attributed to the presence of very small (< 15 A. dia) particles of superparamagnetic iron in a zero-valent oxidation state.« less
  • There is renewed interest in the United States (U.S.) to construct new Generation III and III+ reactors within the next decade and Generation IV reactors in the future. Licensing by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is a significant consideration and these new plants may pose new challenges. One such challenge is the advances in human factors engineering (HFE) methods that are used. These methods are used to design and evaluate the HFE aspects of a plant, such as the human-system interface (HSI). These methods are important because NRC HFE reviews are design process oriented, thus, the criteria are mostlymore » technology neutral with regard to reactor design.[1] However, the HFE review criteria are not neutral with respect to the HFE methods that are used as part of the design process This will be important for new reactor reviews because the diversity of reactor types, HSIs, and operational concepts will increase, especially for Generation III+ and IV plants. Thus the NRC is conducting research to identify advances in HFE methods and to develop additional guidance to address their review.« less
  • The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) endorsement of consensus standards provides a cost-effective means of enhancing the staff’s ability to review state-of-the-art designs. Although the NRC endorsed consensus standards in many technical disciplines, it yet has to do so in human factors engineering (HFE). The purpose of our study was to develop a standardized methodology whereby to evaluate a consensus HFE standard to determine its appropriateness to, and adequacy for using in licensing reviews. The high-level objective of the methodology is to ensure that the guidance meets the NRC’s requirements on scientific- and engineering-rigor that they use in developing theirmore » own guidance. We propose four criteria for endorsing a consensus standard: (1) It should meet an existing need for NRC’s licensing and safety reviews; (2) it should be based on sound HFE principles; (3) it should be thoroughly peer-reviewed; and, (4) it should address human performance issues identified in the literature. Our methodology offers a means to assess these four criteria. We used it to evaluate an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’ (IEEE) draft standard on computerized operating procedure systems. We concluded that the IEEE standard generally met the established criteria, although several areas were identified that needed further clarification. Our evaluation methodology particularly was useful for identifying issues to be resolved, and for providing a basis for judging whether the staff should consider endorsing the standard. The methodology also helped recognize criteria in the proposed standard that may benefit from additional scrutiny by the staff. The evaluation methodology developed is applicable generally to reviewing other HFE standards that the NRC is considering for use or endorsement.« less
  • As nuclear power utilities embark on projects to upgrade and modernize power plants, they are likely to discover that traditional engineering methods do not typically make provision for the integration of human considerations. In addition, human factors professionals will find that traditional human performance methods such as function allocation, task analysis, human reliability analysis and human-machine interface design do not scale well to the complexity of a large-scale nuclear power upgrade project. Up-to-date human factors engineering processes, methods, techniques and tools are required to perform these kinds of analyses. This need is recognized widely in industry and an important partmore » of the Department of Energy’s Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program deals with identifying potential impacts of emerging technologies on human performance and the technical bases needed to address them. However, so far no formal initiative has been launched to deal with the lack of integrated processes. Although human factors integration frameworks do exist in industries such as aviation or defense, no formal integrated human factors process exists in the nuclear industry. As a first step towards creating such a process, a “unified human factors engineering process” is proposed as a framework within which engineering organizations, human factors practitioners and regulatory bodies can ensure that human factors requirements are embedded in engineering activities throughout the upgrade project life cycle.« less