skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Study of Experience Credit for Professional Engineering Licensure

Abstract

Oak Ridge National Laboratory performed a study of experience credit for professional engineering licensure for the Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) Program. One of the study's goals was to determine how state licensure boards grant experience credit for engineering licensure, particularly in regards to IAC experience and experience prior to graduation. Another goal involved passing IAC information to state licensure boards to allow the boards to become familiar with the program and determine if they would grant credit to IAC graduates. The National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES) has adopted a document, the ''Model Law''. This document empowers states to create state engineering boards and oversee engineering licensure. The board can also interpret and adopt rules and regulations. The Model Law also gives a general ''process'' for engineering licensure, the ''Model Law Engineer''. The Model Law Engineer requires that an applicant for professional licensure, or professional engineering (PE) licensure, obtain a combination of formal education and professional experience and successfully complete the fundamentals of engineering (FE) and PE exams. The Model Law states that a PE applicant must obtain four years of ''acceptable'' engineering experience after graduation to be allowed to sit for the PEmore » exam. Although the Model Law defines ''acceptable experience,'' it is somewhat open to interpretation, and state boards decide whether applicants have accumulated the necessary amount of experience. The Model Law also allows applicants one year of credit for postgraduate degrees as well as experience credit for teaching courses in engineering. The Model Law grants states the power to adopt and amend the bylaws and rules of the Model Law licensure process. It allows state boards the freedom to modify the experience requirements for professional licensure. This power has created variety in experience requirements, and licensure requirements can differ from state to state. Before this study began, six questions were developed to help document how state boards grant experience credit. Many of the questions were formulated to determine how states deal with teaching experience, postgraduate credit, experience prior to graduation, PE and FE waivers, and the licensure process in general. Data were collected from engineering licensure boards for each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Telephone interviews were the primary method of data collection, while email correspondence was also used to a lesser degree. Prior to contacting each board, the researchers attempted to review each state's licensure web site. Based on the data collected, several trends and patterns were identified. For example, there is a general trend away from offering credit for experience prior to graduation. The issue becomes a problem when a PE from one state attempts to gain a license in another state by comity or endorsement. Tennessee and Kansas have recently stopped offering this credit and Mississippi cautions applicants that it could be difficult to obtain licensure in other states.« less

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
885738
Report Number(s):
ORNL/TM-2003/191
TRN: US200617%%2
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS//MATHEMATICS, COMPUTING, AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; ENGINEERS; LICENSING PROCEDURES; STATE GOVERNMENT; TRAINING; WORK; EMPLOYMENT

Citation Formats

Martin, M.A.. A Study of Experience Credit for Professional Engineering Licensure. United States: N. p., 2003. Web. doi:10.2172/885738.
Martin, M.A.. A Study of Experience Credit for Professional Engineering Licensure. United States. doi:10.2172/885738.
Martin, M.A.. Mon . "A Study of Experience Credit for Professional Engineering Licensure". United States. doi:10.2172/885738. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/885738.
@article{osti_885738,
title = {A Study of Experience Credit for Professional Engineering Licensure},
author = {Martin, M.A.},
abstractNote = {Oak Ridge National Laboratory performed a study of experience credit for professional engineering licensure for the Department of Energy's Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) Program. One of the study's goals was to determine how state licensure boards grant experience credit for engineering licensure, particularly in regards to IAC experience and experience prior to graduation. Another goal involved passing IAC information to state licensure boards to allow the boards to become familiar with the program and determine if they would grant credit to IAC graduates. The National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES) has adopted a document, the ''Model Law''. This document empowers states to create state engineering boards and oversee engineering licensure. The board can also interpret and adopt rules and regulations. The Model Law also gives a general ''process'' for engineering licensure, the ''Model Law Engineer''. The Model Law Engineer requires that an applicant for professional licensure, or professional engineering (PE) licensure, obtain a combination of formal education and professional experience and successfully complete the fundamentals of engineering (FE) and PE exams. The Model Law states that a PE applicant must obtain four years of ''acceptable'' engineering experience after graduation to be allowed to sit for the PE exam. Although the Model Law defines ''acceptable experience,'' it is somewhat open to interpretation, and state boards decide whether applicants have accumulated the necessary amount of experience. The Model Law also allows applicants one year of credit for postgraduate degrees as well as experience credit for teaching courses in engineering. The Model Law grants states the power to adopt and amend the bylaws and rules of the Model Law licensure process. It allows state boards the freedom to modify the experience requirements for professional licensure. This power has created variety in experience requirements, and licensure requirements can differ from state to state. Before this study began, six questions were developed to help document how state boards grant experience credit. Many of the questions were formulated to determine how states deal with teaching experience, postgraduate credit, experience prior to graduation, PE and FE waivers, and the licensure process in general. Data were collected from engineering licensure boards for each of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Telephone interviews were the primary method of data collection, while email correspondence was also used to a lesser degree. Prior to contacting each board, the researchers attempted to review each state's licensure web site. Based on the data collected, several trends and patterns were identified. For example, there is a general trend away from offering credit for experience prior to graduation. The issue becomes a problem when a PE from one state attempts to gain a license in another state by comity or endorsement. Tennessee and Kansas have recently stopped offering this credit and Mississippi cautions applicants that it could be difficult to obtain licensure in other states.},
doi = {10.2172/885738},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Aug 11 00:00:00 EDT 2003},
month = {Mon Aug 11 00:00:00 EDT 2003}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The purpose of this project has been to develop a response to the educational needs of engineers working in the southeast's nuclear industry. The first phase of the project, now complete, was a study to assess the nature of the educational need. The second phase was intended to implement a program to meet those needs. Due in part to continued reorganization within DOE a proposal for implementation was never acted upon. DOE did however approve application of residual funds from the study phase to a modest initiation of implementation activity. Work is now underway in the development of educational packagesmore » in two subject areas: The Nuclear Fuel Cycle and The Metallurgy of Stainless Steel and Nickel-Base Alloys.« less
  • Under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, the College of Engineering at the University of South Carolina has conducted an assessment of educational needs among engineers working in nuclear fuel cycle related areas. The study was initiated as a regional effort focusing on the concentration of nuclear industry in the Southeast. Educational needs addressed were those at the post-baccalaureate professional level. The project was envisioned as providing base line information for the eventual implementation of a program in line with the needs of the Southeast's nuclear community. Specific objectives were to establish the content of such a program andmore » to determine those specialized features which would make the program most attractive and useful.« less
  • The educational needs of engineers and scientists working in nuclear related industry in the southeastern United States were investigated. The results are expected to form the basis for implementing a program to meet these educational needs. The project runs the duration of FY78, and this report covers the third quarter of operations, April through June, 1978. During the past quarter, that phase of the project concerning the needs analysis survey is now complete. A list of subject areas has been compiled based on the results of the survey. Work is now in process to develop a course description relative tomore » each subject. These descriptions are to include level, depth, content, prerequisite information, makeup of the audience, learning resources, and suggested delivery format. Samples are given of course descriptions which have already been prepared.« less
  • An assessment was conducted of educational needs among engineers working in nuclear fuel cycle-related areas, focusing on the nuclear industry in the Southeast. Educational needs addressed were those at the post-baccalaureate professional level. As a result of the study, a list of subject areas has been compiled as best representing the current content of an educational program. In addition to identifying subject areas, a set of course descriptions and reference materials has been developed around each subject. Each course description contains information regarding objectives, anticipated audience, and prerequisites and offers a suggested course outline. An initial modest program of implementationmore » is recommended which would continue to concentrate on the Southeast as a target area.« less
  • To achieve energy conservation measures in buildings' power and lighting systems, landscaped spaces, parks, freeways, building sites, etc., the responsible engineers and tradespeople will have to be educated in ways to conserve energy. This report analyzes a key way of intervening in such education and training to promote energy conservation through the State licensing process. This study rests on the assumption that if candidates for State licenses were tested on their knowledge of energy conservation, each licensee would know how to conserve energy through his or her chosen profession. The study also assumes that, once licensing examinations include questions onmore » energy conservation, the ways in which people are trained for occupations that affect energy use would change rapidly+. It was assumed that if candidates were tested on their knowledge of energy conservation, training institutions (colleges and universities) and publishers would institutionalize energy conservation in their curricula and publications to prepare candidates for the examinations, which would achieve a long-term structural change. The objectives of this study are: to identify approximately five licensed occupations, which because of their size or function, can promote energy conservation; to assess the extent to which energy conservation is already part of the licensing process; to assess the feasibility of amending the licensing procedure in those occupations to highlight energy conservation; and to recommend strategies to bring energy conservation into the licensing process. Seventeen boards were initially identified to have an impact on energy conservation, but were narrowed to these five areas: architecture, engineers, contractors, landscape architecture, and accounting. Specific data for California were used for the study. (MCW)« less