skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database

Abstract

At the Yucca Mountain Project the Project Requirements Processing System assists in the management of relationships between regulatory and national/industry standards source criteria, and Quality Assurance Requirements and Description document (DOE/R W-0333P) requirements to create compliance matrices representing respective relationships. The matrices are submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to assist in the commission's review, interpretation, and concurrence with the Yucca Mountain Project QA program document. The tool is highly customized to meet the needs of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Quality Assurance.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Yucca Mountain Project, Las Vegas, Nevada
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
882577
Report Number(s):
NA
MOL.20060130.0150 DC#46821; TRN: US0603544
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2006 ANS IHLRWM CONFERENCE AND PUBLICATION IN PROCEEDINGS
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; COMPLIANCE; MANAGEMENT; MATRICES; PROCESSING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; YUCCA MOUNTAIN

Citation Formats

MURTHY, R., NAYDENOVA, A., DEKLEVER, R., BOONE, A.. Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database. United States: N. p., 2006. Web.
MURTHY, R., NAYDENOVA, A., DEKLEVER, R., BOONE, A.. Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database. United States.
MURTHY, R., NAYDENOVA, A., DEKLEVER, R., BOONE, A.. Mon . "Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/882577.
@article{osti_882577,
title = {Quality Assurance Source Requirements Traceability Database},
author = {MURTHY, R., NAYDENOVA, A., DEKLEVER, R., BOONE, A.},
abstractNote = {At the Yucca Mountain Project the Project Requirements Processing System assists in the management of relationships between regulatory and national/industry standards source criteria, and Quality Assurance Requirements and Description document (DOE/R W-0333P) requirements to create compliance matrices representing respective relationships. The matrices are submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to assist in the commission's review, interpretation, and concurrence with the Yucca Mountain Project QA program document. The tool is highly customized to meet the needs of the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Office of Quality Assurance.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jan 30 00:00:00 EST 2006},
month = {Mon Jan 30 00:00:00 EST 2006}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Application of QA requirements for packaging and transportation of radioactive materials should not be solely based on safety-related considerations. The operability of items, components, and systems must be considered as equally important. The nuclear industry has begun to recognize operability considerations along with safety concerns. This has resulted in a new approach in establishing QA requirements for packaging.
  • In the course of assisting the USEPA and the USGS in automating their water quality surveillance laboratories, quality assurance requirements for this function were investigated in detail. It was found that while computerization of instruments and functions can be of great assistance in operations, scientific insight must, in the end, be the final judge of quality. These laboratories engage in several kinds of activities which differ in important details. One of them had the primary mission of analytical methods development and validation. Another was the analytical facility for sewage treatment process development. The others engaged in three different activities, specialmore » surveys to establish baseline water standards, routine surveillance to detect variations from baseline, and special studies to collect the data for action against polluters. The similarities and differences of requirements in these various situations are discussed.« less
  • Representatives of the pulp and paper industry in the US have assembled guidelines for preparation for regulatory agency inspections of the framework of quality assurance associated with self-monitoring data collected for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) disharge monitoring report purposes. These guidelines address effluent flow measurement; sample collection, preservation, and analysis; analysis methods quality control; and record keeping. This paper summarizes the guidelines and presents examples of the experience of the industry with quality assurance-oriented inspections. 30 references, 1 table.
  • Many factors are producing an increasing demand for formal quality assurance programs in RandD organizations. However, successful application of QA to the scientific disciplines and RandD staff is uniquely challenging. This is especially true in the DOE multiprogram laboratories where DOE has mandated formal QA systems based on the ANSI/ASME NQA-1 Standard and where the past culture has tended to be academic and collegiate. This paper describes how a formal QA program, based on NQA-1, has been evolved and effectively implemented in a multiprogram national laboratory. The description covers the obstacles that have to be addressed and discusses the establishmentmore » of minimum and baseline standards which marry the basic requirements of NQA-1 with the basic principles of scientific discipline and good management practices. 8 refs., 3 figs.« less