skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Justification for Shielded Receiver Tube Additional Lead Shielding

Abstract

In order to reduce high radiation dose rates encountered when core sampling some radioactive waste tanks the addition of 240 lbs. of lead shielding is being considered to the shielded receiver tube on core sample trucks No.1, No.3 and No.4. The lead shielding is 4 inch diameter x 1/2 inch thick half rounds that have been installed around the SR tube over its' full length. Using three unreleased but independently reviewed structural analyses HNF-6018 justifies the addition of the lead shielding.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
CHG (US)
Sponsoring Org.:
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (US)
OSTI Identifier:
803011
Report Number(s):
RPP-6018, Rev.0
EDT-627890; TRN: US0300214
DOE Contract Number:
AC27-99RL14047
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: 11 Apr 2000
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; SAMPLING; SHIELDING; TANKS

Citation Formats

BOGER, R.M. Justification for Shielded Receiver Tube Additional Lead Shielding. United States: N. p., 2000. Web. doi:10.2172/803011.
BOGER, R.M. Justification for Shielded Receiver Tube Additional Lead Shielding. United States. doi:10.2172/803011.
BOGER, R.M. 2000. "Justification for Shielded Receiver Tube Additional Lead Shielding". United States. doi:10.2172/803011. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/803011.
@article{osti_803011,
title = {Justification for Shielded Receiver Tube Additional Lead Shielding},
author = {BOGER, R.M.},
abstractNote = {In order to reduce high radiation dose rates encountered when core sampling some radioactive waste tanks the addition of 240 lbs. of lead shielding is being considered to the shielded receiver tube on core sample trucks No.1, No.3 and No.4. The lead shielding is 4 inch diameter x 1/2 inch thick half rounds that have been installed around the SR tube over its' full length. Using three unreleased but independently reviewed structural analyses HNF-6018 justifies the addition of the lead shielding.},
doi = {10.2172/803011},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2000,
month = 4
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • Notes on the design and construction of lead-shielded containers are presented for the guidance of designers. Emphasis is on the combination of the properties of the metal, good design, and correct manufacturing technique to provide an efficient shield at reasonable cost. (D.L.C.)
  • This report provides justification for the continued use of the existing documented pressure suppression pool boundary and main vent chugging loads specified for Mark II lead plant assessment evaluations. It provides a technical basis for permitting the licensing review cycle of the Mark II lead plants to continue on schedule. The first part of the report justifies the use of pool boundary chugging loads documented in the Mark II Phase I, II, and III Temporary Tall Tank Test (4T) Facility Application Memorandum and indicates that these loads are conservative for Mark II Lead Plant evaluations. This position is supported bymore » a comparison of the 4T Application Memorandum chugging specification with both the expected loading condition predicted by a recently developed three-dimensional multivent hydrodynamic model and additional test data analyzed since publication of the Application Memorandum. The second part justifies the use of the main vent lateral chugging loads documented in the Mark II Dynamic Forcing Function Information Report (DFFIR). This specification, based on test results employed by General Electric, is presented and Mark II 4T data is used to expand the full scale single vent data base and to better define the application to the Mark II system. In addition, recent multivent test data is used to demonstrate that the current probabilistic multivent lateral load methodology presented as part of the load specification in the DFFIR is conservative.« less
  • This analysis evaluates the structural design adequacy of the shielded receiver lifting frame (SRLF) for the rotary mode core sampler truck number 2 (RMCST{number_sign}2). The analysis considers the loads expected during operation of the SRLF. Most of the existing welds were not in conformance with those specified on the drawings, H-2-91715 and -91716 (RHO 1988a and RHO 1988b). Stress analysts and engineers examined the configuration of the welds connecting the frame members of the SRLF and those connecting the SRLF to the drill rig. In comparison to those shown on the drawing, some of the actual welds appear stronger andmore » others undersized. For example, the actual fillet welds completely encircle the junctures of members, although the drawings show some welds to be on two sides only. Attempts to find the original design calculations were unsuccessful. To resolve the nonconformance, the critical welds were identified by analysis and subsequently inspected to ensure they are as large or larger than the minimum is defined by weld leg size. A required weld size, as determined by stress analysis, of 0.1 inch or larger is considered to be critical. This size was selected because no existing welds were found to be less than 0.125 inch. Analysis results led to weld modifications to strengthen the SRLF. The weld modifications performed are described in WHC 1994.« less