skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor for Improved Resource Utilization: Part I - Survey of Potential Improvements

Abstract

This document is an interim report under ACDA BOA AC9NX707, Task Order 80-03, which covers the evaluation of certain potential improvements in pressurized water reactor designs intended to enhance uranium fuel utilization. The objective of these evaluations is to seek advanced, non-retrofittable improvements that could possibly be commercialized by the end of the century, and, on the basis of a preliminary evaluation, to select compatible improvements for incorporation into a composite advanced pressurized water reactor concept. The principal areas of investigation include reduced parasitic absorption of neutrons (Task 1), reduced neutron leakage (Task 2), and alternative fuel design concepts (Task 3). To the extent possible, the advanced concept developed in an earlier study (Retrofittable Modifications to Pressurized Water Reactors for Improved Resource Utilization, SSA-128, October 1980) is used as a basis in developing the advanced composite concept. The reference design considered typical of present PWR commercial practice is the system described in RESAR-414, Reference Safety Analysis Report, Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems, October 1976.

Authors:
; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Southern Science Applications, Inc., Dunedin, FL (US)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (US)
OSTI Identifier:
802886
Report Number(s):
SSA-136
CNN: AC9NX707; TRN: US200301%%456
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: 15 Sep 1981
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; 22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS; ABSORPTION; DESIGN; EVALUATION; MODIFICATIONS; NEUTRON LEAKAGE; NEUTRONS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PWR TYPE REACTORS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; URANIUM

Citation Formats

Turner, S.E., Gurley, M.K., Kirby, K.D., and Mitchell, W. III. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor for Improved Resource Utilization: Part I - Survey of Potential Improvements. United States: N. p., 1981. Web. doi:10.2172/802886.
Copy to clipboard
Turner, S.E., Gurley, M.K., Kirby, K.D., & Mitchell, W. III. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor for Improved Resource Utilization: Part I - Survey of Potential Improvements. United States. doi:10.2172/802886.
Copy to clipboard
Turner, S.E., Gurley, M.K., Kirby, K.D., and Mitchell, W. III. Tue . "Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor for Improved Resource Utilization: Part I - Survey of Potential Improvements". United States. doi:10.2172/802886. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/802886.
Copy to clipboard
@article{osti_802886,
title = {Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor for Improved Resource Utilization: Part I - Survey of Potential Improvements},
author = {Turner, S.E. and Gurley, M.K. and Kirby, K.D. and Mitchell, W. III},
abstractNote = {This document is an interim report under ACDA BOA AC9NX707, Task Order 80-03, which covers the evaluation of certain potential improvements in pressurized water reactor designs intended to enhance uranium fuel utilization. The objective of these evaluations is to seek advanced, non-retrofittable improvements that could possibly be commercialized by the end of the century, and, on the basis of a preliminary evaluation, to select compatible improvements for incorporation into a composite advanced pressurized water reactor concept. The principal areas of investigation include reduced parasitic absorption of neutrons (Task 1), reduced neutron leakage (Task 2), and alternative fuel design concepts (Task 3). To the extent possible, the advanced concept developed in an earlier study (Retrofittable Modifications to Pressurized Water Reactors for Improved Resource Utilization, SSA-128, October 1980) is used as a basis in developing the advanced composite concept. The reference design considered typical of present PWR commercial practice is the system described in RESAR-414, Reference Safety Analysis Report, Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems, October 1976.},
doi = {10.2172/802886},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 1981},
month = {Tue Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 1981}
}
Copy to clipboard
Technical Report:
View Technical Report (2.84 MB)
DOI:  10.2172/802886
Save / Share:
Export Metadata
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.

  • ; ; ; ...
    This report evaluates the enhanced resource utilization in an advanced pressurized water reactor (PWR) concept using a composite of selected improvements identified in a companion study. The selected improvements were in the areas of reduced loss of neutrons to control poisons, reduced loss of neutrons in leakage from the core, and improved blanket/reflector concepts. These improvements were incorporated into a single composite advanced PWR. A preliminary assessment of resource requirements and costs and impact on safety are presented.

  • The results of a study made to evaluate the most promising design of a pressurized water reactor and turbine generator plant are presented. A plant size was developed of 248 Mw(e) capability which gives a net station output of slightly over 236 Mw(e). The plant is a heterogeneous light water cooled and moderated pressurized water reactor with a gross heat output of 685 Mw(th). The core is of two-radial zone design with stainless steel clad uranium oxide fuel elements containing boron burnable poison to minimize mechanical control requirements. A study was made to determine the construction and operating costs ofmore » a comparable coal-fired plant. Power generation costs of 7.10 and 8.26 mills/ kwh are estimated for the conventional and nuclear plants. (W.D.M.)« less

  • This report summarizes work performed for the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under BOA AC9NX707 (Task Order 80-02), as part of the Agency's continuing program on improved fuel utilization in light water reactors. The objective of the study was to investigate improvements in fuel management and design of water reactors (PWRs) that could potentially increase the utilization of natural uranium resources in a once-through fuel cycle (i.e., without using spent fuel reprocessing and recycle). For the present study, potential improvements were limited to retrofittable concepts, i.e., those which could be modifications to the reactor system or balance of plant.more » The potential improvements considered were not necessarily restricted to those which might be economical under current uranium ore prices or to those which might be acceptable to the nuclear industry at the present time. A six-month fuel cycle, for example, although technically possible, would be neither economical nor accept able to the industry at the present time. Although all potential improvements are not necessarily compatible with each other, the target objective was to seek a composite system of compatible improvements that, if possible, could increase uranium resource utilization by 30% or more. Economic factors, risks involved in the introduction, and potential licensing concerns are also addressed in the report.« less

  • This study assesses the feasibility of designing Seed and Blanket (S&B) Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) to generate a significant fraction of the core power from radial thorium fueled blankets that operate on the Breed-and-Burn (B&B) mode without exceeding the radiation damage constraint of presently verified cladding materials. The S&B core is designed to maximize the fraction of neutrons that radially leak from the seed (or “driver”) into the subcritical blanket and reduce neutron loss via axial leakage. The blanket in the S&B core makes beneficial use of the leaking neutrons for improved economics and resource utilization. A specific objective ofmore » this study is to maximize the fraction of core power that can be generated by the blanket without violating the thermal hydraulic and material constraints. Since the blanket fuel requires no reprocessing along with remote fuel fabrication, a larger fraction of power from the blanket will result in a smaller fuel recycling capacity and lower fuel cycle cost per unit of electricity generated. A unique synergism is found between a low conversion ratio (CR) seed and a B&B blanket fueled by thorium. Among several benefits, this synergism enables the very low leakage S&B cores to have small positive coolant voiding reactivity coefficient and large enough negative Doppler coefficient even when using inert matrix fuel for the seed. The benefits of this synergism are maximized when using an annular seed surrounded by an inner and outer thorium blankets. Among the high-performance S&B cores designed to benefit from this unique synergism are: (1) the ultra-long cycle core that features a cycle length of ~7 years; (2) the high-transmutation rate core where the seed fuel features a TRU CR of 0.0. Its TRU transmutation rate is comparable to that of the reference Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR) with CR of 0.5 and the thorium blanket can generate close to 60% of the core power; but requires only one sixth of the reprocessing and fabrication capacity per unit of core power. Nevertheless, these high-performance cores were designed to set upper bounds on the S&B core performance by using larger height and pressure drop than those of typical SFR design. A study was subsequently undertaken to quantify the tradeoff between S&B core design variables and the core performance. This study concludes that a viable S&B core can be designed without significant deviation from SFR core design practices. For example, the S&B core with 120cm active height will be comparable in volume, HM mass and specific power with the S-PRISM core and could fit within the S-PRISM reactor vessel. 43% of this core power will be generated by the once-through thorium blanket; the required capacity for reprocessing and remote fuel fabrication per unit of electricity generated will be approximately one fifth of that for a comparable ABR. The sodium void worth of this 120cm tall S&B core is significantly less positive than that of the reference ABR and the Doppler coefficient is only slightly smaller even though the seed uses a fertile-free fuel. The seed in the high transmutation core requires inert matrix fuel (TRU-40Zr) that has been successfully irradiated by the Fuel Cycle Research & Development program. An additional sensitivity analysis was later conducted to remove the bias introduced by the discrepancy between radiation damage constraints -- 200 DPA applied for S&B cores and fast fluence of 4x1023 n(>0.1MeV)/cm2 applied for ABR core design. Although the performance characteristics of the S&B cores are sensitive to the radiation damage constraint applied, the S&B cores offer very significant performance improvements relative to the conventional ABR core design when using identical constraint.« less

  • ; ; ; ...
    This report calculates the risk benefit associated with potential performance improvements for the large dry pressurized water reactor (PWR) containment. The analysis is based on the June 1989 draft NUREG-1150 results for the Zion commercial nuclear reactor. Simplified containment event trees and the large accident progression event trees from draft NUREG-1150 are used to evaluate the effects of the potential improvements on the response of the Zion containment to dominant severe accident sequences. Source terms are generated parametrically using the ZISOR code and offsite consequences are calculated with the MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS). These results give point estimatesmore » of the risk reduction associated with each containment improvement identified by Brookhaven National Laboratory in their draft Issues Characterization Report. 12 refs., 22 figs., 55 tabs.« less