skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty estimates for calibration measurements

Abstract

The volume of liquid in a process tank is typically determined from a calibration function that relates tank volume to some measure of liquid height. This calibration equation is determined from data acquired during one or more calibration runs. Solutions are proposed for two statistical problems that arise when the calibration function is derived and used: that of computing plausible variance estimates if the data exhibit statistically significant run-to-run differences and that of computing confidence intervals that hold simultaneously for an arbitrary number of volume determinations. When statistically significant run-to-run differences are ignored and standard statistical procedures are applied to data, resulting variance estimates can seriously underestimate actual measurement variability. In the proposed procedure, the variance of a predicted new response is estimated as the sum of two components: one due to run-to-run differences and one due to the fitted model. Depending upon the nature of the model(s) required to fit the data, estimates of the response variance components take one of three forms. For linear functions, estimates of component variances are derived from sums of squares that are computed during an analysis of covariance. The estimated calibration function is used to determine the volumes that correspond to observed liquidmore » heights. Confidence intervals are required that hold simultaneously for arbitrarily many volume determinations. A procedure for computing simultaneous discrimination intervals employs variance estimates computed as described above in Scheffe-type simultaneous prediction intervals. These intervals are combined with tolerance intervals on the response variable to obtain equations that can be solved to obtain the desired discrimination intervals for volume determinations.« less

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (USA); Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA); ENEA, Rome (Italy)
OSTI Identifier:
7039310
Report Number(s):
PNL-SA-14402; CONF-861104-13; IAEA-SM-293/81
ON: DE87003097
DOE Contract Number:  
AC06-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: International symposium on nuclear material safeguards, Vienna, Austria, 10 Nov 1986; Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION; CALIBRATION; DATA COVARIANCES; TANKS; VOLUME; IAEA SAFEGUARDS; LIQUIDS; CONTAINERS; FLUIDS; SAFEGUARDS; 055001* - Nuclear Fuels- Safeguards, Inspection, & Accountability- Technical Aspects

Citation Formats

Liebetrau, A M, Goldman, A S, and Aparo, M. Uncertainty estimates for calibration measurements. United States: N. p., 1986. Web.
Liebetrau, A M, Goldman, A S, & Aparo, M. Uncertainty estimates for calibration measurements. United States.
Liebetrau, A M, Goldman, A S, and Aparo, M. Wed . "Uncertainty estimates for calibration measurements". United States.
@article{osti_7039310,
title = {Uncertainty estimates for calibration measurements},
author = {Liebetrau, A M and Goldman, A S and Aparo, M},
abstractNote = {The volume of liquid in a process tank is typically determined from a calibration function that relates tank volume to some measure of liquid height. This calibration equation is determined from data acquired during one or more calibration runs. Solutions are proposed for two statistical problems that arise when the calibration function is derived and used: that of computing plausible variance estimates if the data exhibit statistically significant run-to-run differences and that of computing confidence intervals that hold simultaneously for an arbitrary number of volume determinations. When statistically significant run-to-run differences are ignored and standard statistical procedures are applied to data, resulting variance estimates can seriously underestimate actual measurement variability. In the proposed procedure, the variance of a predicted new response is estimated as the sum of two components: one due to run-to-run differences and one due to the fitted model. Depending upon the nature of the model(s) required to fit the data, estimates of the response variance components take one of three forms. For linear functions, estimates of component variances are derived from sums of squares that are computed during an analysis of covariance. The estimated calibration function is used to determine the volumes that correspond to observed liquid heights. Confidence intervals are required that hold simultaneously for arbitrarily many volume determinations. A procedure for computing simultaneous discrimination intervals employs variance estimates computed as described above in Scheffe-type simultaneous prediction intervals. These intervals are combined with tolerance intervals on the response variable to obtain equations that can be solved to obtain the desired discrimination intervals for volume determinations.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {1986},
month = {10}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share: