U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Scientific and Technical Information
Who pays for sunk costs
Abstract
The issue of who pays for certain competitively-induced excess capacity costs has been resolved in a number of rate cases in the natural-gas and electric-utility industries. Many FERC-regulated pipelines have sustained large sales losses because they have attempted to recover uncompetitive cost levels in the face of an expanding array of competitive alternatives to pipeline sales, such as transportation, conservation, and alternative fuels. In several cases in recent years, the FERC has assigned some of the cost of unused pipeline capacity to stockholders. At the state commission level, electric and natural gas cases dealing with incentive or cogeneration deferral industrial rate discounts have been the most frequent venue for determining rate payer-stockholder allocations of completitively-induced uneconomic sunk costs. In most of these cases, the utility's attempts to recover excess sunk costs have made competitive alternatives more attractive to industrial customers, leading to actual or threatened loss of utility sales. Utilities and regulators have responded by attempting to preserve or increase utility sales by allowing rate discounts for price-elastic industrial customers who maintain or increase loads. 101 references.
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- OSTI Identifier:
- 7019925
- Resource Type:
- Book
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; RATE STRUCTURE; EXCESS COSTS; ALLOCATIONS; GAS UTILITIES; REGULATIONS; CAPACITY; COMPETITION; STATE GOVERNMENT; COST; PUBLIC UTILITIES; 293000* - Energy Planning & Policy- Policy, Legislation, & Regulation; 296000 - Energy Planning & Policy- Electric Power; 290200 - Energy Planning & Policy- Economics & Sociology
Citation Formats
Wilson, J W. Who pays for sunk costs. United States: N. p., 1988.
Web.
Wilson, J W. Who pays for sunk costs. United States.
Wilson, J W. 1988.
"Who pays for sunk costs". United States.
@article{osti_7019925,
title = {Who pays for sunk costs},
author = {Wilson, J W},
abstractNote = {The issue of who pays for certain competitively-induced excess capacity costs has been resolved in a number of rate cases in the natural-gas and electric-utility industries. Many FERC-regulated pipelines have sustained large sales losses because they have attempted to recover uncompetitive cost levels in the face of an expanding array of competitive alternatives to pipeline sales, such as transportation, conservation, and alternative fuels. In several cases in recent years, the FERC has assigned some of the cost of unused pipeline capacity to stockholders. At the state commission level, electric and natural gas cases dealing with incentive or cogeneration deferral industrial rate discounts have been the most frequent venue for determining rate payer-stockholder allocations of completitively-induced uneconomic sunk costs. In most of these cases, the utility's attempts to recover excess sunk costs have made competitive alternatives more attractive to industrial customers, leading to actual or threatened loss of utility sales. Utilities and regulators have responded by attempting to preserve or increase utility sales by allowing rate discounts for price-elastic industrial customers who maintain or increase loads. 101 references.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7019925},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1988},
month = {Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1988}
}