skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantify information system benefits

Abstract

What are information systems and how do they relate to control systems? How do information systems produce benefits in hydrocarbon processing? What are some examples of benefit-generating information system applications? Information System Benefits (ISBEN) is a structured methodology for estimating information system benefits in hydrocarbon processing. The paper discusses information and control systems, information system benefits and applications, objectives, strategies and measures of ISBEN, ISBEN business drivers, ISBEN database, ISBEN methodology, and implementation.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. SETPOINT Inc., Houston, TX (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
69959
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Hydrocarbon Processing; Journal Volume: 74; Journal Issue: 6; Other Information: PBD: Jun 1995
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
02 PETROLEUM; 99 MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS; PETROLEUM REFINERIES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS CONTROL; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DATA BASE MANAGEMENT; FEEDBACK; ACTUATORS; MONITORING; USES

Citation Formats

Koppel, L.B.. Quantify information system benefits. United States: N. p., 1995. Web.
Koppel, L.B.. Quantify information system benefits. United States.
Koppel, L.B.. Thu . "Quantify information system benefits". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_69959,
title = {Quantify information system benefits},
author = {Koppel, L.B.},
abstractNote = {What are information systems and how do they relate to control systems? How do information systems produce benefits in hydrocarbon processing? What are some examples of benefit-generating information system applications? Information System Benefits (ISBEN) is a structured methodology for estimating information system benefits in hydrocarbon processing. The paper discusses information and control systems, information system benefits and applications, objectives, strategies and measures of ISBEN, ISBEN business drivers, ISBEN database, ISBEN methodology, and implementation.},
doi = {},
journal = {Hydrocarbon Processing},
number = 6,
volume = 74,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1995},
month = {Thu Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1995}
}
  • Accurately predicting the fuel savings that can be achieved with the implementation of various technologies developed for fuel efficiency can be very challenging, particularly when considering combinations of technologies. Differences in the usage of highway vehicles can strongly influence the benefits realized with any given technology, which makes generalizations about fuel savings inappropriate for different vehicle applications. A model has been developed to estimate the potential for reducing fuel consumption when advanced efficiency technologies, or combinations of these technologies, are employed on highway vehicles, particularly medium- and heavy-duty trucks. The approach is based on a tractive energy analysis applied tomore » drive cycles representative of the vehicle usage, and the analysis specifically accounts for individual energy loss factors that characterize the technologies of interest. This tractive energy evaluation is demonstrated by analyzing measured drive cycles from a long-haul trucking fleet and the results of an assessment of the fuel savings potential for combinations of technologies are presented. The results of this research will enable more reliable estimates of the fuel savings benefits that can be realized with particular technologies and technology combinations for individual trucking applications so that decision makers can make informed investment decisions for the implementation of advanced efficiency technologies.« less
  • As one of the most energy-, emission- and pollution-intensive industries, iron and steel production is responsible for significant emissions of greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutants. Although many energy-efficiency measures have been proposed by the Chinese government to mitigate GHG emissions and to improve air quality, lacking full understanding of the costs and benefits has created barriers against implementing these measures widely. This paper sets out to advance the understanding by addressing the knowledge gap in costs, benefits, and cost-effectiveness of energy-efficiency measures in iron and steel production. Specifically, we build a new evaluation framework to quantify energy benefits andmore » environmental benefits (i.e., CO 2 emission reduction, air-pollutants emission reduction and water savings) associated with 36 energy-efficiency measures. Results show that inclusion of benefits from CO 2 and air-pollutants emission reduction affects the cost-effectiveness of energy-efficiency measures significantly, while impacts from water-savings benefits are moderate but notable when compared to the effects by considering energy benefits alone. The new information resulted from this study should be used to augment future programs and efforts in reducing energy use and environmental impacts associated with steel production.« less
  • The results of this analysis suggest that the benefits of imposing more stringent ozone regulations in the Corn Belt (from 0.12 to 0.08 ppm hourly maximum) are approximately $0.7 billion. Conversely, relaxation in present standards from 0.12 to 0.16 ppm may result in losses of benefits in excess of $2.0 billion. These estimates exceed some regional benefits estimates reported elsewhere. Such an increase in magnitude of benefits may be partially attributable to the scope of the sector model used here (including livestock) and the availability of more realistic (accurate) response data on ozone impacts. 23 references, 5 tables.
  • The results of research linking biological data on pollutant levels with economic assessments of air pollution controls focus on alternative ozone standards as they affect agricultural economics. The results suggest that the benefits of imposing more stringent ozone regulations in the Corn Belt (from 0.12 to 0.08 ppm hourly maximum) are about $0.7 billion. Relaxation of current standards to 0.16 ppm will reduce benefits in excess of $2.0 billion. The analysis is based on a sectoral model simulating a long-run, perfectly competitive US agriculture, but the underlying assumptions and model structure are open to question. Future research may use amore » multiple-year base model rather than that of a single year. 15 references, 5 tables.« less