skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Technical notes for the conceptual design for an atmospheric fluidized-bed direct combustion power generating plant. [Comparison of AFB plant and pulverized coal plant]

Abstract

The first part of this report presents a comparison of the conceptual designs of a large (570 MW(e)) pulverized coal (PC) steam generator equipped with a wet limestone flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system and two equivalent sized atmospheric fluidized bed (AFB) steam generators including balance of plants for electric-power generation. The reader is cautioned that this portion of the report compares a zero generation AFB technology to pulverized coal technology which has been operationally and economically optimized for the past half-century. This comparison is intended to be indicative of whether further development of the AFB concept as a viable alternative to the PC/FGD concept for electric-power generation is merited. In the second part, the load-following capability of a once-through subcritical atmospheric fluidized bed boiler is analyzed. Digital computer simulation predictions of the plant's response to open loop step changes in firing rate, feedwater flow, governor valve, unit load demand, etc, are made. The predicted response of throttle pressure, steam temperature, unit load, etc, are compared to the response of a conventional coal-fired, once-through, subcritical unit. The load-following capability is assessed through this qualitative comparison. Additional model response predictions are also presented for which no test data are presently available.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Stone and Webster Engineering Corp., New York (USA)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
6742704
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 6742704
Report Number(s):
HCP/T2583-01/4
DOE Contract Number:
EF-77-C-01-2583
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS; 01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTORS; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; DESIGN; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; COAL; COMBUSTION; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DESULFURIZATION; DIGITAL COMPUTERS; FLUE GAS; BURNERS; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COMBUSTORS; COMPUTERS; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GASEOUS WASTES; OXIDATION; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; WASTES 200104* -- Fossil-Fueled Power Plants-- Components; 014000 -- Coal, Lignite, & Peat-- Combustion

Citation Formats

None. Technical notes for the conceptual design for an atmospheric fluidized-bed direct combustion power generating plant. [Comparison of AFB plant and pulverized coal plant]. United States: N. p., 1978. Web. doi:10.2172/6742704.
None. Technical notes for the conceptual design for an atmospheric fluidized-bed direct combustion power generating plant. [Comparison of AFB plant and pulverized coal plant]. United States. doi:10.2172/6742704.
None. Sat . "Technical notes for the conceptual design for an atmospheric fluidized-bed direct combustion power generating plant. [Comparison of AFB plant and pulverized coal plant]". United States. doi:10.2172/6742704. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6742704.
@article{osti_6742704,
title = {Technical notes for the conceptual design for an atmospheric fluidized-bed direct combustion power generating plant. [Comparison of AFB plant and pulverized coal plant]},
author = {None},
abstractNote = {The first part of this report presents a comparison of the conceptual designs of a large (570 MW(e)) pulverized coal (PC) steam generator equipped with a wet limestone flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system and two equivalent sized atmospheric fluidized bed (AFB) steam generators including balance of plants for electric-power generation. The reader is cautioned that this portion of the report compares a zero generation AFB technology to pulverized coal technology which has been operationally and economically optimized for the past half-century. This comparison is intended to be indicative of whether further development of the AFB concept as a viable alternative to the PC/FGD concept for electric-power generation is merited. In the second part, the load-following capability of a once-through subcritical atmospheric fluidized bed boiler is analyzed. Digital computer simulation predictions of the plant's response to open loop step changes in firing rate, feedwater flow, governor valve, unit load demand, etc, are made. The predicted response of throttle pressure, steam temperature, unit load, etc, are compared to the response of a conventional coal-fired, once-through, subcritical unit. The load-following capability is assessed through this qualitative comparison. Additional model response predictions are also presented for which no test data are presently available.},
doi = {10.2172/6742704},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Apr 01 00:00:00 EST 1978},
month = {Sat Apr 01 00:00:00 EST 1978}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share: