FERC ruling highlights differences between notification and certification procedures for qualifying facilities
On June 15, the FERC dismissed a motion by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) to intervene to challenge the filing of Merck, Sharp and Dohme Quimica De Puerto Rico, Inc. (Merck), for qualifying status under PURPA. (Docket QF 84-188). The FERC's reason for dismissing the motion for intervention was that the Merck submission was not a true application for certification, but rather, merely a notice that the proposed facility would in fact be a qualifying facility. Under FERC rules, a qualifying cogenerator or small power producer may follow either of two procedures: (1) an application procedure, under which the FERC will rule on whether a particular facility is a qualifying facility, or (2) a notification procedure, under which FERC does not rule. The application is a voluntary, optional procedure, provided by FERC for situations in which a potential qualifying facility requires affirmative certification, typically for financing purposes. Otherwise, merely filing a notification is sufficient for a qualifying facility to be able to take advantage of the benefits of PURPA.
- OSTI ID:
- 6712480
- Journal Information:
- Cogener. Small Power Mon.; (United States), Journal Name: Cogener. Small Power Mon.; (United States)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
How to soften the impact of FERC order limiting cogeneration right to backup power
FERC rules environmental impact not to be issue in QF certifications
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
COGENERATION
LEGAL ASPECTS
DUAL-PURPOSE POWER PLANTS
CERTIFICATION
NOTICES
PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY POLICIES ACT
US FERC
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
DEUS
ENERGY SYSTEMS
LAWS
NATIONAL ENERGY ACT
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
POWER GENERATION
POWER PLANTS
STEAM GENERATION
US DOE
US ORGANIZATIONS
290800* - Energy Planning & Policy- Heat Utilization- (1980-)
293000 - Energy Planning & Policy- Policy
Legislation
& Regulation