skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparative analysis of core drilling and rotary drilling in volcanic terrane

Abstract

Initially, the goal of this report is to compare and contrast penetration rates of rotary-mud drilling and core drilling in young volcanic terranes. It is widely recognized that areas containing an abundance of recent volcanic rocks are excellent targets for geothermal resources. Exploration programs depend heavily upon reliable subsurface information, because surface geophysical methods may be ineffective, inconclusive, or both. Past exploration drilling programs have mainly relied upon rotary-mud rigs for virtually all drilling activity. Core-drilling became popular several years ago, because it could deal effectively with two major problems encountered in young volcanic terranes: very hard, abrasive rock and extreme difficulty in controlling loss of circulation. In addition to overcoming these difficulties, core-drilling produced subsurface samples (core) that defined lithostratigraphy, structure and fractures far better than drill-chips. It seemed that the only negative aspect of core drilling was cost. The cost-per-foot may be two to three times higher than an ''initial quote'' for rotary drilling. In addition, penetration rates for comparable rock-types are often much lower for coring operations. This report also seeks to identify the extent of wireline core drilling (core-drilling using wireline retrieval) as a geothermal exploration tool. 25 refs., 21 figs., 13 tabs.

Authors:
; ;  [1]
  1. (ed.)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Nevada Univ., Reno (USA). Div. of Earth Sciences
OSTI Identifier:
6698971
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 6698971; Legacy ID: DE89001754
Report Number(s):
DOE/SF/16609-T1
ON: DE89001754
DOE Contract Number:
AP03-86SF16609
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING; 15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; VOLCANIC ROCKS; DRILLING; COST; DRILL BITS; DRILL CORES; GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION; GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES; NUMERICAL DATA; PENETRATION DEPTH; ROCK DRILLING; ROTARY DRILLING; DATA; DRILLING EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; EXPLORATION; IGNEOUS ROCKS; INFORMATION; RESOURCES; ROCKS Geothermal Legacy

Citation Formats

Flynn, T., Trexler, D.T., and Wallace, R.H. Jr. Comparative analysis of core drilling and rotary drilling in volcanic terrane. United States: N. p., 1987. Web. doi:10.2172/6698971.
Flynn, T., Trexler, D.T., & Wallace, R.H. Jr. Comparative analysis of core drilling and rotary drilling in volcanic terrane. United States. doi:10.2172/6698971.
Flynn, T., Trexler, D.T., and Wallace, R.H. Jr. Wed . "Comparative analysis of core drilling and rotary drilling in volcanic terrane". United States. doi:10.2172/6698971. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6698971.
@article{osti_6698971,
title = {Comparative analysis of core drilling and rotary drilling in volcanic terrane},
author = {Flynn, T. and Trexler, D.T. and Wallace, R.H. Jr.},
abstractNote = {Initially, the goal of this report is to compare and contrast penetration rates of rotary-mud drilling and core drilling in young volcanic terranes. It is widely recognized that areas containing an abundance of recent volcanic rocks are excellent targets for geothermal resources. Exploration programs depend heavily upon reliable subsurface information, because surface geophysical methods may be ineffective, inconclusive, or both. Past exploration drilling programs have mainly relied upon rotary-mud rigs for virtually all drilling activity. Core-drilling became popular several years ago, because it could deal effectively with two major problems encountered in young volcanic terranes: very hard, abrasive rock and extreme difficulty in controlling loss of circulation. In addition to overcoming these difficulties, core-drilling produced subsurface samples (core) that defined lithostratigraphy, structure and fractures far better than drill-chips. It seemed that the only negative aspect of core drilling was cost. The cost-per-foot may be two to three times higher than an ''initial quote'' for rotary drilling. In addition, penetration rates for comparable rock-types are often much lower for coring operations. This report also seeks to identify the extent of wireline core drilling (core-drilling using wireline retrieval) as a geothermal exploration tool. 25 refs., 21 figs., 13 tabs.},
doi = {10.2172/6698971},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EST 1987},
month = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EST 1987}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The purpose is: (1) to describe the 1981 drilling of Kilauea Iki lava lake, (2) to present the logs for the drill core recovered during the 1981 drilling, and (3) to present a summary of some of the field observations made during the 1967, 1975, 1976 and 1979 drillings that are relevant to the crystallization history of Kilauea Iki lava lake. This report supplements logs for the 1967-1979 core presented in Helz et al. (1980). 21 references, 4 figures, 4 tables.
  • A core driller was developed for coring hard sludge in underground tanks, and sludge samples were taken from the Purex 241-A-103 tank. The development, design, and operation of the drill are described. An electric conductivity probe was used to stop the drill when it contacted the tank bottom. Qualitative observations are given on the physical properties of the sludge in drilling tests.
  • A core driller was developed for coring hard sludge in underground tanks, and sludge samples were taken from the Purex 241-A-103 tank. The development, design, and operation of the drill are described. An electric conductivity probe was used to stop the drill when it contacted the tank bottom. Qualitative observations are given on the physical properties of the sludge in drilling tests. (D.L.C.)
  • This document summarizes the plan for sampling and analysis of tank 241-BY-104
  • This sampling and analysis plan (SAP) identities characterization objectives pertaining to sample collection, laboratory analytical evaluation, and reporting requirements for push mode core samples from tank 241-TX-113 (TX-113). The Tank Characterization Technical Sampling Basis document identities Retrieval, Pretreatment and Immobilization as an issue that applies to tank TX-113. As a result, a 150 gram composite of solids shall be made and archived for that program. This tank is not on a Watch List.