Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988

doi:https://doi.org/10.2172/6610302

Title: Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

Several hours of fire and numerous explosions destroyed the Pacific Engineering Company plant in Henderson, Nevada, that manufactured ammonium perchlorate (AP) for rocket fuel. This incident began about 1130 PDT on May 4, 1988, with a fire in their Batch House that grew out of control and caused a first large explosion at about 1153 PDT. The final and largest explosion occurred about 1157 PDT. Damages to the surrounding community were surveyed and interpreted as airblast overpressures versus distances, which allowed an estimate of 1-kiloton nuclear free-air-burst for the equivalent explosion yield. This could be reproduced by 250-tons TNT burst on the ground surface. Weather reports were obtained from the National Weather Services which indicated somewhat enhanced airblast propagation downwind toward northerly directions and attenuated airblast propagations upwind in southerly directions. It was impossible, for lack of winds aloft information below about 500 m above ground, to determine whether there was any atmospheric acoustic airblast focusing. Several seismic recordings in Las Vegas showed the greatest ground motion resulted from the airblast wave passage, traveling at near acoustic speed. Ground wave arrival times were not sufficiently precise to allow seismic speed interpretations. Of the 4000 tons of AP apparently stored inmore »« less

Authors:: Reed, J. W.

Publication Date:: 1988-11-01

Research Org.:: Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)

OSTI Identifier:: 6610302

Report Number(s):: SAND-88-2902
ON: DE89004503

DOE Contract Number:: AC04-76DP00789

Resource Type:: Technical Report

Resource Relation:: Other Information: Paper copy only, copy does not permit microfiche production

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE; PROPELLANTS; CHEMICAL EXPLOSIONS; SAFETY; EVALUATION; BLAST EFFECTS; DAMAGE; FAILURE MODE ANALYSIS; FIRE FIGHTING; FIRES; GROUND MOTION; NEVADA; ROCKETS; SEISMIC EVENTS; EXPLOSIONS; FEDERAL REGION IX; MOTION; NORTH AMERICA; SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USA; 450100* - Military Technology, Weaponry, & National Defense- Chemical Explosions & Explosives

Citation Formats


                    Reed, J. W. Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988.  United States: N. p., 1988. 
        Web.  doi:10.2172/6610302.

Copy to clipboard


                    Reed, J. W. Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/6610302

Copy to clipboard


                    Reed, J. W. Tue .  
        "Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/6610302.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6610302.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_6610302,

  title        = {Analysis of the accidental explosion at Pepcon, Henderson, Nevada, May 4, 1988},

  author       = {Reed, J. W.},

  abstractNote = {Several hours of fire and numerous explosions destroyed the Pacific Engineering Company plant in Henderson, Nevada, that manufactured ammonium perchlorate (AP) for rocket fuel. This incident began about 1130 PDT on May 4, 1988, with a fire in their Batch House that grew out of control and caused a first large explosion at about 1153 PDT. The final and largest explosion occurred about 1157 PDT. Damages to the surrounding community were surveyed and interpreted as airblast overpressures versus distances, which allowed an estimate of 1-kiloton nuclear free-air-burst for the equivalent explosion yield. This could be reproduced by 250-tons TNT burst on the ground surface. Weather reports were obtained from the National Weather Services which indicated somewhat enhanced airblast propagation downwind toward northerly directions and attenuated airblast propagations upwind in southerly directions. It was impossible, for lack of winds aloft information below about 500 m above ground, to determine whether there was any atmospheric acoustic airblast focusing. Several seismic recordings in Las Vegas showed the greatest ground motion resulted from the airblast wave passage, traveling at near acoustic speed. Ground wave arrival times were not sufficiently precise to allow seismic speed interpretations. Of the 4000 tons of AP apparently stored in and around the plant, it appears that about 1500 tons detonated in the largest explosion. This leads to a conclusion that the TNT airblast equivalence factor for AP is near 1/6. An independent estimate, based on analysis of more ideal close-in structural deformations, suggested an equivalence factor of 1/3. 25 refs., 12 figs., 14 tabs.},

  doi          = {10.2172/6610302},

  url          = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6610302},
  journal      = {},
number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {1988},

  month        = {11}

}

Copy to clipboard

Technical Report:

View Technical Report (2.80 MB)

https://doi.org/10.2172/6610302

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

Explosion airblast predictions on a personal computer and application to the Henderson, Nevada, incident. [Air blast or buried]

Conference Reed, J W

An airblast prediction program for explosions, called BLASTO, has been written for use with IBM-PC (or compatible) computers, to produce overpressure-distance curves for a variety of interactive input conditions. Several common units are allowed for each input, but calculation and output are in SAI metric units. Explosion yield (chemical or nuclear) and ambient atmospheric pressure are used to generate a referenced 'Standard' overpressure-distance curve. Explosives may be point charges at any height, above ground or depth below the earth surface. Buried charges may also be distributed in a sheet, or 'HEST' configuration. If upper air weather data or forecasts aremore »« less
Air pressure waves from Mount St. Helens eruptions

Journal Article Reed, J W - J. Geophys. Res.; (United States)

Weather station barograph records as well as infrasonic recordings of the pressure wave from the Mount St. Helens eruption of May 18, 1980, have been used to estimate an equivalent explosion airblast yield for this event. Pressure amplitude versus distance patterns in various directions compared with patterns from other large explosions, such as atmospheric nuclear tests, the Krakatoa eruption, and the Tunguska comet impact, indicate that the wave came from an explosion equivalent of a few megatons of TNT. The extent of tree blowdown is considerably greater than could be expected from such an explosion, and the observed forest damagemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD10p11979
Detection of explosive events by monitoring acoustically-induced geomagnetic perturbations

Technical Report Lewis, J P ; Rock, D R ; Shaeffer, D L ; ...

The Black Thunder Coal Mine (BTCM) near Gillette, Wyoming was used as a test bed to determine the feasibility of detecting explosion-induced geomagnetic disturbances with ground-based induction magnetometers. Two magnetic observatories were fielded at distances of 50 km and 64 km geomagnetically north from the northernmost edge of BTCM. Each observatory consisted of three separate but mutually orthogonal magnetometers, Global Positioning System (GPS) timing, battery and solar power, a data acquisition and storage system, and a three-axis seismometer. Explosions with yields of 1 to 3 kT of TNT equivalent occur approximately every three weeks at BTCM. We hypothesize that explosion-inducedmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/12544

Full Text Available
Climatological assessment of airblast propagations from explosion tests at White Sands Missile Range

Technical Report Reed, J W

Atmospheric acoustic refraction, by upper air temperature and wind strata, may duct and focus explosion airblast waves, sometimes causing nuisance level damages at several times the normal distances. Large explosion tests at White Sands Missile Range may thus threaten window damage, with possible hazard from falling glass, in various surrounding communities. To establish what explosion yields may be reasonably contemplated (with acceptable delays) and the best time of year for these tests, a climatological assessment has been prepared from five years of upper air weather observations made at the Albuquerque and El Paso airports. Each twice-daily radiosonde balloon observation frommore »« less
Intermediate-range explosion airblast propagations

Conference Reed, J W

Some modern rocket propellants may be accidentally detonated to cause an explosion airblast hazard to tens of kilometers range, depending on atmospheric acoustic refraction conditions. In a recent attempt to refine propagation predictions, airblasts were recorded from several hundred small explosions (2.3 kg to 1145 kg TNT) under intensively observed weather conditions, at both ESMC, Florida, and WSMC, California. Resultant correlations, between weather and airblast propagation strength, will be used to estimate accidental explosion airblast overpressures at surrounding communities, the expected damage to windows and other sensitive structural components, and the hazard to people from breaking and falling glass.

Similar Records