skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Installation-restoration program. Phase 2. Confirmation/quantification. Stage 1 for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Final report, January 1984-October 1986

Abstract

The primary objectives of this project were to collect and analyze groundwater, surface water, and sediment samples and to perform an initial characterization of the hydrogeochemical regime at potential contamination sites on Shaw Air Force Base near Sumter, South Carolina. This study constituted Phase II of the U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). Five potential sources of groundwater pollution were studied. The evaluation primarily included the drilling of soil test borings, the installation, development, and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, and the analyses of soil, surface water, and groundwater samples. Also used in the study were field measurements of water quality, water-level measurements site observations, published hydrogeologic data and Shaw AFB documents.

Authors:
;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC (USA). Center for Environmental Measurement
OSTI Identifier:
6530333
Report Number(s):
AD-A-177507/1/XAB
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: Availability: Microfiche copies only
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; GROUND WATER; LAND POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTION; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; WASTE DISPOSAL; MILITARY FACILITIES; SOUTH CAROLINA; POLLUTION SOURCES; FIELD TESTS; MONITORING; SAMPLING; SEDIMENTS; SOILS; SURFACE WATERS; WASTES; WATER QUALITY; WATER WELLS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; FEDERAL REGION IV; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; NORTH AMERICA; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION; TESTING; USA; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER; WELLS 520200* -- Environment, Aquatic-- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport-- (-1989); 510200 -- Environment, Terrestrial-- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport-- (-1989)

Citation Formats

Alexander, W.J., and Liddle, S.K. Installation-restoration program. Phase 2. Confirmation/quantification. Stage 1 for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Final report, January 1984-October 1986. United States: N. p., 1986. Web.
Alexander, W.J., & Liddle, S.K. Installation-restoration program. Phase 2. Confirmation/quantification. Stage 1 for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Final report, January 1984-October 1986. United States.
Alexander, W.J., and Liddle, S.K. 1986. "Installation-restoration program. Phase 2. Confirmation/quantification. Stage 1 for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Final report, January 1984-October 1986". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_6530333,
title = {Installation-restoration program. Phase 2. Confirmation/quantification. Stage 1 for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. Final report, January 1984-October 1986},
author = {Alexander, W.J. and Liddle, S.K.},
abstractNote = {The primary objectives of this project were to collect and analyze groundwater, surface water, and sediment samples and to perform an initial characterization of the hydrogeochemical regime at potential contamination sites on Shaw Air Force Base near Sumter, South Carolina. This study constituted Phase II of the U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). Five potential sources of groundwater pollution were studied. The evaluation primarily included the drilling of soil test borings, the installation, development, and sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, and the analyses of soil, surface water, and groundwater samples. Also used in the study were field measurements of water quality, water-level measurements site observations, published hydrogeologic data and Shaw AFB documents.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1986,
month = 9
}

Technical Report:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that may hold this item. Keep in mind that many technical reports are not cataloged in WorldCat.

Save / Share:
  • A problem-confirmation study was performed at seven sites on Chanute AFB identified in the Phase I investigation as requiring further study (Fire Training Areas 1 and 2, Landfill Nos. 1,2,3 and 4, and Building 932 Fuel Oil Storage Area). The field investigation was conducted from October 1984 to June 1985 and included the installation of 25 monitor wells, collection and analysis of groundwater samples from monitor wells, and collection and analysis of soil samples from the Building 932 Area. Analytes include VOA, TOC, TDS, Oil and Grease, EP Toxicity, Ignitibility, Xylene, Phenol, Chromium, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-TP. Based on the hydro-geologicmore » complexity of the physical setting and findings of the sampling and analytical work, follow-on investigations were recommended at all seven sites.« less
  • Appendicies include: Glossary of Terminology and Abbreviations; Task Order 0047; Professional Profiles of Key Personnel; Well Construction Summaries Boring Logs; Sampling and Quality Assurance Plans; Sampling and Chain of Custody Documentation, Round I - Environmental Sampling, Round II - Environmental Sampling; Environmental Resampling Round; Analytical Protocol; Analytical Laboratory Data, Results Sampling Round I, Results Sampling Round II, Results Resampling, Federal Register Part V, Illinois Water Pollution Control Rules.
  • A Phase II, Stage 1 survey was conducted at Maxwell Air Force Base (MAFB), Ala., to confirm the existence of potential contaminants at former disposal and storage sites identified by a Phase I record search. Ten sites were investigated including six landfill or disposal areas, two fire-protection training areas, a drum-storage area, and surface-water-drainage areas. Geophysical surveys were conducted at four disposal areas, and 20 ground water monitor wells were installed. Surface waters, ground waters, and sediments were sampled and analyzed for various screening parameters including total organic carbon, total organic halogens, phenols, oil and grease, pH, specific conductance, andmore » total dissolved solids. The samples were also analyzed for specific parameters including cyanide, cadmium, chromium, copper, zinc, lead, selenium, silver, barium, mercury, arsenic, sulfate, nitrate, iron, endrin, lindane, methoxychlor, toxaphene, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Results of the analysis indicate low-level contamination at several study sites. Additional testing is recommended to identify and quantify halogenated organic species and to further evaluate the extent of contamination of the shallow aquifer.« less
  • Partial contents include: Well Construction Summaries, Boring Logs, and Hydraulic Conductivity Test Results; Field Raw Data; Sampling and Quality Assurance Plan; Analytical Methods and Required Detection Limits; Laboratory Analytical Reports; Federal and State Water Quality and Human Health Standards Applicable in the State of New Hampshire; Site Safety Plan.
  • AeroVironment Inc. was tasked to conduct a Phase II Stage I investigation at Williams AFB, near Phoenix, AZ. The objective was to confirm and to quantify the presence and extent of contamination at the fire protection training area 2 (FPTA), liquid fuels storage area (LFSA), surface drainage system - southwest, landfill, pesticide burial area, and surface drainage system - northwest. Drilling and soil sampling were conducted at the FPTA, FLSA, and landfill. Thirty-one holes were drilled in the three areas. Surface soil samples were collected along the two drainage channels. Also, a magnetometer survey was conducted at the pesticide burialmore » area. A total of 272 samples were collected. Of the 272 samples collected, 204 were analyzed in the laboratory. Soil contamination was found at: 1) small burn pit at FPTA, 2) drainage outfall at FPTA, 3) old AVGAS distribution system at LFSA, and 4) southwest drainage system. Magnetic anomalies (buried drums) were identified at the pesticide burial area. Recommendations made for Williams include: 1) remove surface soils from the southwest drainage, 2) excavate and inspect the identified buried materials at the pesticide disposal area, 3) collect additional samples around contamination at the FPTA and LFSA.« less