skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Generic criticality safety issues

Abstract

An independent group has been designated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., (MMES) to internally review Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) that describe containers for shipment of radioactive material. This group is called the Energy Systems Independent Review Group (ESIRG), reporting to the MMES Transportation Safety Manager as part of a central staff function. The ESIRG focus is Y-12 Plant packages, with additional review responsibilities for the Paducah Tiger UF{sub 6} overpack and 6M package. Review questions are posed directly to the SARP preparers. This paper addresses three generic issues that arose during the ESIRG criticality reviews: analysis tools, uncertainties in results, and resulting (finite) probability of criticality. 6 refs., 1 tab.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; USDOE, Washington, DC (USA)
OSTI Identifier:
6082067
Report Number(s):
CONF-910603-1
ON: DE91006335
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-84OR21400
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Annual meeting of the American Nuclear Society (ANS), Orlando, FL (USA), 2-6 Jun 1991
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; 42 ENGINEERING; CRITICALITY; COMPUTER CALCULATIONS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; PACKAGING RULES; S CODES; SAFETY; SUBCRITICALITY; COMPUTER CODES; MATERIALS; REGULATIONS; 050900* - Nuclear Fuels- Transport, Handling, & Storage; 420204 - Engineering- Shipping Containers; 054000 - Nuclear Fuels- Health & Safety; 056000 - Nuclear Fuels- Legislation & Regulations- (1987-)

Citation Formats

Hively, L.M. Generic criticality safety issues. United States: N. p., 1991. Web.
Hively, L.M. Generic criticality safety issues. United States.
Hively, L.M. 1991. "Generic criticality safety issues". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6082067.
@article{osti_6082067,
title = {Generic criticality safety issues},
author = {Hively, L.M.},
abstractNote = {An independent group has been designated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., (MMES) to internally review Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs) that describe containers for shipment of radioactive material. This group is called the Energy Systems Independent Review Group (ESIRG), reporting to the MMES Transportation Safety Manager as part of a central staff function. The ESIRG focus is Y-12 Plant packages, with additional review responsibilities for the Paducah Tiger UF{sub 6} overpack and 6M package. Review questions are posed directly to the SARP preparers. This paper addresses three generic issues that arose during the ESIRG criticality reviews: analysis tools, uncertainties in results, and resulting (finite) probability of criticality. 6 refs., 1 tab.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1991,
month = 1
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • This three-volume report contains papers presented at the conference. The papers are printed in the order of their presentation in each session and describe progress and results of programs in nuclear safety research conducted in this country and abroad. Foreign participation in the meeting included papers presented by researchers from France, Japan, Norway, and Russia. The titles of the papers and the names of the authors have been updated and may differ from those that appeared in the final program of the meeting. This volume contains the following information: (1) plenary sessions; (2) pressure vessel research; (3) BWR strainer blockagemore » and other generic safety issues; (4) environmentally assisted degradation of LWR components; and (5) update on severe accident code improvements and applications. Selected papers have been indexed separately for inclusion in the Energy Science and Technology Database.« less
  • This five-volume report contains 141 papers out of the 175 that were presented at the Sixteenth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, during the week of October 24-27, 1988. The papers are printed in the order of their presentation in each session and describe progress and results of programs in nuclear safety research conducted in this country and abroad. Foreign participation in the meeting included twenty different papers presented by researchers from Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The titles of the papers and the namesmore » of the authors have been updated and may differ from those that appeared in the final program of the meeting. This document, Volume 1, discusses Decontamination and Decommissioning; License Renewal; Human Factors; Generic Issues; Risk Analysis/PRA Applications; and Reactor Safety.« less
  • In the late 1980s, many new requirements for nuclear criticality safety (NCS) training were drafted in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) orders and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards. During the same period, Martin Marietta Energy Systems (MMES) recognized that our current NCS training program had become obsolete. Based on this conclusion, a family of generic training courses was developed to address the [open quotes]basics[close quotes] of NCS. These courses were designed and developed to be utilized at all five installations managed by MMES and to be in compliance with all the new requirements.
  • The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continues to support research leading to resolutions of generic safety issues (GSIs) that have been identified by its management systems. In one research effort, the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) developed personal computer-based programs capable of assisting in GSI resolutions. These programs provide a low cost, standard means of performing probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) calculations, which determine the values (e.g., the averted risks) of proposed GSI resolutions. In conjunction with the development of these computer programs, INEL has researched the limitations of PRA analysis for evaluating GSIs. This research consisted of performing an issuemore » by issue review of each GSI that has been identified by the NRC, in order to provide answers to a list of standard questions concerning each GSI. 3 refs., 4 figs.« less