skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The magic is off: Doing more with less


This paper deals with the use of data processing techniques in normal Naval business practices and strategies. In particular the use of productivity tools and expert systems are discussed. 1 fig.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
ON: DE88001737
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: NARDAC Washington/ORNL/DSRD conference on expert systems technology in the ADP environment, Washington, DC, USA, 2 Nov 1987; Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Loebl, A.S.. The magic is off: Doing more with less. United States: N. p., 1987. Web.
Loebl, A.S.. The magic is off: Doing more with less. United States.
Loebl, A.S.. Mon . "The magic is off: Doing more with less". United States. doi:.
title = {The magic is off: Doing more with less},
author = {Loebl, A.S.},
abstractNote = {This paper deals with the use of data processing techniques in normal Naval business practices and strategies. In particular the use of productivity tools and expert systems are discussed. 1 fig.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Nov 02 00:00:00 EST 1987},
month = {Mon Nov 02 00:00:00 EST 1987}

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The RD24 Collaboration at CERN investigates the use of the Scalable Coherent Interface (SCI) for DAQ Systems at the LHC. They present the status of the hardware and software, simulations, switches and their use for event building and a pilot project for early SCI applications.
  • All industry, including the chemical industry, continues to be faced with an ever increasing challenge: doing more with less. While this applies to every aspect of the process industries, the part of the business that is usually hardest hit is doing more with less people. One place where this really hits home is in training. More qualified people and people that are more qualified are needed. History has shown that a primary way to get more done with less work is to automate the work as much as possible. Processes continue to become more automated so one can produce moremore » product more efficiently with tighter control on quality. The same thinking needs to be applied to developing their people. Their training processes need to be automated to produce their product (qualified people) more efficiently with tighter control on quality. And, just as their chemical process control has turned to using computer technology, so has their people development process. Many companies are already heavily committed to the use of Computer-Based-Training to consolidate and increase training effectiveness, particularly in those subjects requiring recurrent training, such as spill prevention and response, safety, and other mandated topics. But what makes a computer a good tool for training? To understand this one must understand what makes good training in the first place.« less
  • No abstract prepared.
  • The US Department of Energy (DOE) has committed to cleaning up the contamination resulting from decades of nuclear weapons production, an effort that will require many billions of dollars. With the current federal budget concerns, such costs are unpalatable and possibly even untenable. DOE and other federal agencies in a similar situation would seem to face three options: reduce the scope of planned activities, spread the work over a longer time period, or reduce the cost of performing the work. Changing the scope of work or schedule is possible; however, doing either is time-consuming and difficult to accomplish, especially ifmore » binding legal agreements with regulatory agencies are in place. Improving the cost-effectiveness of cleanup operations, then, may be the more viable near-term strategy for reducing costs. The cleanup of the DOE facility at Hanford, Washington, is a prime example. With cleanup costs predicted at over $50 billion, budgets are increasingly coming under scrutiny as the nation searches for ways to cut the national budget. Faced with this situation, the DOE Richland Operations Office conducted a series of studies at Hanford to identify opportunities for improving efficiency of its Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study work. This paper focuses on the concept of conducting studies on cleanup programs to identify opportunities to improve efficiency. The paper describes the studies that were conducted at Hanford, the findings and recommendations resulting from the studies, and the progress that has been made in implementing the recommendations. It also assesses the value of the studies and the lessons that have been learned.« less
  • The gasoline shortage in the US in the summer of 1979 stimulated Congress to take action, even though the actions threaten to make the imbalance worse. The House passed a measure that would create a gigantic new industry to replace imported oil with synthetic fuels derived from coal, shale, and biomass. The Senate is now considering the measure introduced by President Carter in mid-July to create the Energy Security Corporation and the Energy Mobilization Board. The former would spend $88 billion over ten years to stimulate a 2.5-million-barrel-a-day capacity in synthetic fuels and other unconventional sources of oil and gas.more » The other agency would clear away the regulatory thickets that inhibit the siting and licensing of energy facilities. In addition, Federal money would be aimed at mass transportation, research on more-efficient cars, subsidies to homeowners to install solar-heating and conservation measures, and financial aid to poor people to meet higher energy costs. The source of this money would be companies through a tax on the higher profits that presumably will result from the decontrol of oil prices. In these schemes, government is dealing with issues beyond its normal competence and its record in energy affairs has been poor, Mr. Alexander says. In fact, he cites government's inability to strike a reasonable balance between an adequate supply of reasonably priced energy, national security, distributional equity, and environmental quality over the last ten years as the reason for most energy difficulties. Government's most valuable contribution, he contends, would be to establish a favorable climate for the market system to work its way through to an optimal equilibrium between energy supply and demand.« less