skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Investigating seismotectonics in the eastern United States using a geographic information system

Abstract

In the central and eastern U.S. (CEUS) the assessment of seismic hazard is problematic because the active tectonic features are generally not identified. Many ideas have been proposed to explain why earthquakes occur in the CEUS and which geologic structures are associated with the earthquakes. Earthquakes in the CEUS have been attributed to postglacial rebound, the reactivation of preexisting zones of weakness in the continental crust near extensions of oceanic fracture zones, stress concentrations associated with mafic/ultramafic plutonic masses, intersections of major structural features in the crust, reactivation of previously rifted crust, present-day faulting along lapetan margin faults, and hydroseismicity. It is possible that many, if not all, of these hypotheses proposed to explain the spatial distribution of earthquakes in the CEUS and to identify potentially active geologic features has some merit, and it is possible that many or all of them are operative in some way in the CEUS. In this study we constructed a GIS database of earthquake, geological and geophysical data, and we used that database to study the correlation of the seismicity with the geology and tectonics of the CEUS. Using earthquake, geological and geophysical parameters derived from this GIS database, we carried out statistical analysesmore » to try to identify seismically active features in the CEUS. We limited our research to the most seismically active areas in the CEUS, namely: (1) the seismically active area of the Appalachians and east coast, from Maine to Georgia, (2) the broadly active region around the New Madrid seismic zone (Illinois and Indiana to Arkansas and Mississippi), and (3) the broad area of low activity throughout Kentucky and Ohio. In our statistical analyses we looked for common geological and geophysical features associated with the seismic activity on a regional basis throughout this study region.« less

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States). Div. of Engineering Technology; Boston Coll., Weston, MA (United States). Weston Observatory
Sponsoring Org.:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
576078
Report Number(s):
NUREG/CR-6573
ON: TI98004090; TRN: 98:004604
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: Feb 1998
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
99 MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS; 58 GEOSCIENCES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHY; TECTONICS; USA; DATA BASE MANAGEMENT; US NRC; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; DATA COMPILATION; SEISMIC EVENTS; STATISTICAL DATA

Citation Formats

Ebel, J.E., Lazarewicz, A.R., and Kafka, A.L. Investigating seismotectonics in the eastern United States using a geographic information system. United States: N. p., 1998. Web. doi:10.2172/576078.
Copy to clipboard
Ebel, J.E., Lazarewicz, A.R., & Kafka, A.L. Investigating seismotectonics in the eastern United States using a geographic information system. United States. doi:10.2172/576078.
Copy to clipboard
Ebel, J.E., Lazarewicz, A.R., and Kafka, A.L. Sun . "Investigating seismotectonics in the eastern United States using a geographic information system". United States. doi:10.2172/576078. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/576078.
Copy to clipboard
@article{osti_576078,
title = {Investigating seismotectonics in the eastern United States using a geographic information system},
author = {Ebel, J.E. and Lazarewicz, A.R. and Kafka, A.L.},
abstractNote = {In the central and eastern U.S. (CEUS) the assessment of seismic hazard is problematic because the active tectonic features are generally not identified. Many ideas have been proposed to explain why earthquakes occur in the CEUS and which geologic structures are associated with the earthquakes. Earthquakes in the CEUS have been attributed to postglacial rebound, the reactivation of preexisting zones of weakness in the continental crust near extensions of oceanic fracture zones, stress concentrations associated with mafic/ultramafic plutonic masses, intersections of major structural features in the crust, reactivation of previously rifted crust, present-day faulting along lapetan margin faults, and hydroseismicity. It is possible that many, if not all, of these hypotheses proposed to explain the spatial distribution of earthquakes in the CEUS and to identify potentially active geologic features has some merit, and it is possible that many or all of them are operative in some way in the CEUS. In this study we constructed a GIS database of earthquake, geological and geophysical data, and we used that database to study the correlation of the seismicity with the geology and tectonics of the CEUS. Using earthquake, geological and geophysical parameters derived from this GIS database, we carried out statistical analyses to try to identify seismically active features in the CEUS. We limited our research to the most seismically active areas in the CEUS, namely: (1) the seismically active area of the Appalachians and east coast, from Maine to Georgia, (2) the broadly active region around the New Madrid seismic zone (Illinois and Indiana to Arkansas and Mississippi), and (3) the broad area of low activity throughout Kentucky and Ohio. In our statistical analyses we looked for common geological and geophysical features associated with the seismic activity on a regional basis throughout this study region.},
doi = {10.2172/576078},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 1998},
month = {Sun Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 1998}
}
Copy to clipboard
Technical Report:
View Technical Report (7.40 MB)
DOI:  10.2172/576078
Save / Share:
Export Metadata
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.

  • The Lab for Energy and Environment (LFEE) at MIT is developing a Geographic Information System (GIS) for carbon management. The GIS will store, integrate, and manipulate information relating to the components of carbon management systems. Additionally, the GIS can be used to interpret and analyze the effect of developing these systems. In the first year of this three year project, we focused on two tasks: (1) specifying the system design--defining in detail the GIS data requirements, the types of analyses that can be conducted, and the forms of output we will produce, as well as designing the computer architecture ofmore » the GIS and (2) creating the ''core'' datasets--identifying data sources and converting them into a form accessible by the GIS.« less

  • ;
    In this project a Carbon Management Geographical Information System (GIS) for the US was developed. The GIS stored, integrated, and manipulated information relating to the components of carbon management systems. Additionally, the GIS was used to interpret and analyze the effect of developing these systems. This report documents the key deliverables from the project: (1) Carbon Management Geographical Information System (GIS) Documentation; (2) Stationary CO{sub 2} Source Database; (3) Regulatory Data for CCS in United States; (4) CO{sub 2} Capture Cost Estimation; (5) CO{sub 2} Storage Capacity Tools; (6) CO{sub 2} Injection Cost Modeling; (7) CO{sub 2} Pipeline Transport Costmore » Estimation; (8) CO{sub 2} Source-Sink Matching Algorithm; and (9) CO{sub 2} Pipeline Transport and Cost Model.« less

  • Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) has been described in the scientific literature as particularly sensitive to air pollution based on foliar injury symptoms, decreased growth, and increased mortality. Wide genotypic variability in tolerance of eastern white pine to air pollution has also been documented. Increment cores from 360 white pine were collected from a total of 24 sites in Tennessee, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine as part of the FORAST (Forest Response to Anthropogenic Stress) project. The study analyzed the FORAST tree growth, air pollution, climate, and competition databases to determine if unexplained alterations in recentmore » growth of white pine occur in a spatial/temporal pattern suggestive of air pollution effects. There is little evidence of widespread growth decline in this sample of white pine. Consistent with reports in the literature, regional mean BAI curves indicate growth has been constant or increasing from 1930 to 1980 for all regions sampled. However, a small proportion (9%) of the sample population exhibits post-1960 alterations in growth trends indicative of tree decline. Regional differences in tree age/size and recent stand dynamics obscured spatial patterns between incidence of tree decline and air pollution. Dendroclimatic analyses indicate white pine growth-climate relationships may have been altered at sites with high ozone exposure. Beginning in the 1950's, growth-climate correlations decrease markedly at high ozone exposure sites. However, the FORAST database has limitations that preclude a rigorous analysis of this potential ozone-climate interaction.« less

  • Part 1 of this 2-volume manual provides general information on the extent and nature of surface mining in the East, the amount of reclamation that has been accomplished, postmining land use alternatives, and environmental effects of surface mining in the past. The report covers much of the information available on fish and wildlife responses to habitat alterations caused by mining and reclamation. Information is presented concerning the capabilities to support fish and wildlife of mine spoils and land forms resulting from mining.

  • ; ;
    The Bureau of Mines study was conducted to obtain a better understanding of the coal mine bump problem and its effect on underground coal mining in the Eastern United States. To accomplish this, information was collected on the geologic conditions, mining techniques, and engineering parameters at five bump-prone mines. Two geologic conditions have been found to cause the occurrence of bumps in the Eastern United States: relatively thick overburden and extremely rigid strata occurring immediately above and below the mine coalbed. Additionally, the probability of bump occurrence is increased by certain mining practices that concentrate stresses during retreat mining, inmore » areas where geologic conditions are conducive to bumps. Mining plans that permit the development of pillar line points or long roof spans that project over gob areas should be avoided because these features may contribute to the occurrence of bumps.« less