Strategic defense initiative: critical issues

Nuckolls, J H

Title: Strategic defense initiative: critical issues

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

The objectives of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) as outlined by President Reagan are discussed. The principal objective for SDI is as a defense against ballistic missiles. Soviet objections and a summary of US-USSR dialogue on the subject are reviewed. Most US studies have been critical of SDI. Four critical issues are addressed in depth: are defense weapons technologically feasible which have high economic leverage relative to offensive ballistic missiles; would the defense feasibility and leverage be degraded or enhanced in the technological race between weapons innovation and countermeasures; could stability be achieved during and after the transition to the defense dominated world envisioned by SDI proponents; would the deployment of high leverage defensive weapons increase or decrease the security of NATO Europe, and the probability of major conventional or nuclear wars. The issue of SDI may lead to a paradox that contains the seeds of catastrophe. The author concludes by warning that nuclear disarmament may eliminate the highly successful deterrent mechanism for avoiding another major world war. In a world made safe for major conventional wars by the apparent ''elimination'' of nuclear weapons, the leaders in a conventional World War III - involving unimaginable suffering, hatred, terror, and deathmore »« less

Authors:: Nuckolls, J H

Publication Date:: Sat Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1985

Research Org.:: Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA)

OSTI Identifier:: 5529030

Report Number(s):: UCRL-92803; CONF-8408122-4
ON: DE85013980

DOE Contract Number:: W-7405-ENG-48

Resource Type:: Conference

Resource Relation:: Conference: 4. international conference on nuclear war, Erice, Sicily, Italy, 19 Aug 1984

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE; EVALUATION; ARMS CONTROL; CONSTRAINTS; NUCLEAR WEAPONS; SPACE WEAPONS; WARFARE; NATIONAL DEFENSE; WEAPONS; 290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy

Citation Formats


                    Nuckolls, J H. Strategic defense initiative: critical issues.  United States: N. p., 1985. 
        Web.

Copy to clipboard


                    Nuckolls, J H. Strategic defense initiative: critical issues.  United States.

Copy to clipboard


                    Nuckolls, J H. 1985.  
        "Strategic defense initiative: critical issues".  United States.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_5529030,

  title        = {Strategic defense initiative: critical issues},

  author       = {Nuckolls, J H},

  abstractNote = {The objectives of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) as outlined by President Reagan are discussed. The principal objective for SDI is as a defense against ballistic missiles. Soviet objections and a summary of US-USSR dialogue on the subject are reviewed. Most US studies have been critical of SDI. Four critical issues are addressed in depth: are defense weapons technologically feasible which have high economic leverage relative to offensive ballistic missiles; would the defense feasibility and leverage be degraded or enhanced in the technological race between weapons innovation and countermeasures; could stability be achieved during and after the transition to the defense dominated world envisioned by SDI proponents; would the deployment of high leverage defensive weapons increase or decrease the security of NATO Europe, and the probability of major conventional or nuclear wars. The issue of SDI may lead to a paradox that contains the seeds of catastrophe. The author concludes by warning that nuclear disarmament may eliminate the highly successful deterrent mechanism for avoiding another major world war. In a world made safe for major conventional wars by the apparent ''elimination'' of nuclear weapons, the leaders in a conventional World War III - involving unimaginable suffering, hatred, terror, and death - would be strongly motivated to introduce nuclear weapons in the crucial decisive battles. Even if diplomacy could ''eliminate'' nuclear weapons, man's knowledge of nuclear weapons can never be eliminated. The paradox is the attempt to eliminate nuclear weapons may maximize the probability of their use. (DMC)},

  doi          = {},

  url          = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5529030},
  journal      = {},
number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Sat Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1985},

  month        = {Sat Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1985}

}

Copy to clipboard

Conference:

Other availability

Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

Exploiting the Soviet threat to Europe

Journal Article Evangelista, M

In the wake of the Reykjavik summit, the most controversial item on the US security agenda, the future of the Strategic Defense Initiative, has become tied even more closely than before to perceptions of Soviet strategy for war in Europe, especially conventional war. Although the relationship between SDI and Soviet conventional forces may not be obvious, a major link is found in proposals for a NATO version of Star Wars - the European Defense initiative, which includes an anti-tactical-missile defense system (ATM). The European Defense Initiative has been justified largely as a necessary response to the deployment of Soviet short-rangemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1987.11459468
Looking beyond the Strategic Defense Initiative. Study project

Technical Report Nichols, D

On 23 March 1983, President Reagan announced a new proposal. This study looks at the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) and how it will achieve the objectives President Reagan envisioned in his speech. It examines a scenario in which deterrence has failed and the time for Presidential decision making is severely compressed. It then looks at Presidential decision making during such a crisis and examines his options. Next, it looks at how the SDI is envisioned to work and contribute to the ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by nuclear ballistic missiles. Last, it examines the possibility that SDI maymore »« less
Strategic and political implications of strategic defense systems development

Miscellaneous Tsaganea, D

The international system is in a process of transition. A mathematical model based on the concept of entropy suggests that the emerging system might be less stable than the former one. It is expected that an increased number of countries will have nuclear capabilities and adequate means of delivery. A reasonable level of military power must be maintained to protect national interests. The significant changes taking place in the world require a reexamination of the role of the vulnerability based deterrence in preventing a nuclear war. This reexamination is done by developing a set of functions (curves) for analyzing themore »« less
Weapons sponsorship: Promoting strategic defense in the nuclear era

Miscellaneous Pratt, E

This study develops a framework for an elite network analysis using a concept called weapons sponsorship (i.e., the utilization of resources by individuals and groups for the promotion of new weapons systems) and traces the evolution of U.S. policy regarding Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) from the immediate post-World War II period up to, and including, President Reagan's decision to initiate the Strategic Defense Initiative. The analysis of the major networks of BMD sponsors found relations between these policy-planning groups to be largely uncoordinated, often competitive, and sometimes antagonistic. In addition, several of these networks were highly polarized internally. These discoveriesmore »« less
Nuclear policy and the defensive transition

Journal Article Payne, K; Gray, C

Reagan's March 23, 1983 Star Wars speech suggesting a shift from the policy of nuclear deterrence to a defensive shield was followed by two studies of the technical and policy issues and the signing of Directive 119 authorizing the strategic defense initiative. The precedent-setting step makes policy, rather than technology the driving force in setting a new direction. The authors examine some of the key issues, including the role of ballistic missile defense in the long term and during the transition, its effect on stability, the reaction of European allies and the Soviet Union, and arms control implications. They concludemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2307/20041909

Similar Records