skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: QCD: Questions, challenges, and dilemmas


An introduction to some outstanding issues in QCD is presented, with emphasis on work by Diakonov and co-workers on the influence of the instanton vacuum on low-energy QCD observables. This includes the calculation of input valence-parton distributions for deep-inelastic scattering. 35 refs., 3 figs.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
SLAC-PUB-7361; CONF-9608101-3
ON: DE97007489; TRN: 97:011335
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: 24. SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics: the strong interaction, from hadrons to protons, Stanford, CA (United States), 19-30 Aug 1996; Other Information: PBD: Nov 1996
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Bjorken, J. QCD: Questions, challenges, and dilemmas. United States: N. p., 1996. Web.
Bjorken, J. QCD: Questions, challenges, and dilemmas. United States.
Bjorken, J. 1996. "QCD: Questions, challenges, and dilemmas". United States. doi:.
title = {QCD: Questions, challenges, and dilemmas},
author = {Bjorken, J.},
abstractNote = {An introduction to some outstanding issues in QCD is presented, with emphasis on work by Diakonov and co-workers on the influence of the instanton vacuum on low-energy QCD observables. This includes the calculation of input valence-parton distributions for deep-inelastic scattering. 35 refs., 3 figs.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1996,
month =

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Industrial activities in almost all countries of the world are governed by an ever-increasing array of licenses, permits and other requirements. These requirements are typically established under statutes or regulations that afford considerable discretion to government regulators to impose operating conditions, discharge limits, reporting obligations and other legally-enforceable environmental regulatory requirements. Many of these requirements impose a significant economic burden. Moreover, noncompliance will frequently have profound consequences for both the entities in question, and the individuals whom they employ. Ideally, regulatory controls having these kinds of characteristics should be based on objective criteria reflecting a thorough scientific understanding of themore » impacts of the activities in question. However, this is frequently not yet the case. The challenge is therefore to achieve an appropriate level of environmental protection while at the same time minimizing unreasonable or excessive restrictions. Hopefully, a more reliable basis for regulatory action will continue to grow through a better scientific understanding of the real consequences of the impacts in question. In the meantime, however, governments, industrial operations and society in general will continue to look to scientists and lawyers to provide the best possible advice. This paper will therefore examine a number of scenarios and case histories where the legal system has applied, or could have applied, scientific inquiry and understanding to achieve balanced, fair and scientifically sound regulatory requirements within the present limits of the understanding of the impacts of industrial or resource development activities.« less
  • There are four known geothermal resource areas in the Imperial Valley that have a combined potential of over 4,000 megawatts of electrical energy for 25 years. The water resources available to support geothermal energy development are imported Colorado River water, agricultural waste waters, Salton Sea water, and ground water. In addition, geothermal power plants can produce their own cooling water in the form of steam condensate. Nevertheless, the relatively high water requirements of geothermal facilities along with a series of real and potential constraints may cause water supply dilemmas involving both the acquisition and use of cooling water. Important constraintsmore » are institutional policies, water supply costs, technical problems, and impacts upon the Salton Sea. These constraints and related dilemmas are examined in light of relevant information on the valley's water resources, geothermal resources and energy technologies, cooling water requirements, and water supply options.« less
  • Sixty-four scientists from universities, national laboratories, and other research institutions worldwide met to evaluate the feasibility and potential of the Biosphere2 Laboratory (B2L) as an inclusive multi-user scientific facility (i.e., a facility open to researchers from all institutions, according to agreed principles of access) for earth system studies and engineering research, education, and training relevant to the mission of the United States Department of Energy (DOE).
  • This report is an account of the deliberations and conclusions of the workshop on "Forefront Questions in Nuclear Science and the Role of High Performance Computing" held January 26-28, 2009, co-sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Physics (ONP) and the DOE Office of Advanced Scientific Computing (ASCR). Representatives from the national and international nuclear physics communities, as well as from the high performance computing community, participated. The purpose of this workshop was to 1) identify forefront scientific challenges in nuclear physics and then determine which-if any-of these could be aided by high performance computing atmore » the extreme scale; 2) establish how and why new high performance computing capabilities could address issues at the frontiers of nuclear science; 3) provide nuclear physicists the opportunity to influence the development of high performance computing; and 4) provide the nuclear physics community with plans for development of future high performance computing capability by DOE ASCR.« less