skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan, Volume 2 Appendices

Abstract

Supporting material for the plan includes: QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR NTS AIR; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR WATER ON AND OFF THE NEVADA TEST SITE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR NTS BIOTA; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING; DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS; VADOSE ZONE MONITORING PLAN CHECKLIST.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Bechtel Nevada Corporation; Nevada Test Site (NTS), Mercury, NV
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Defense Programs (DP)
OSTI Identifier:
4601
Report Number(s):
DOE/NV/11718-244
ON: DE00004601
DOE Contract Number:
AC08-96NV11718
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Nevada Test Site; Radiation Monitoring; Planning

Citation Formats

Bechtel Nevada. Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan, Volume 2 Appendices. United States: N. p., 1998. Web. doi:10.2172/4601.
Bechtel Nevada. Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan, Volume 2 Appendices. United States. doi:10.2172/4601.
Bechtel Nevada. 1998. "Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan, Volume 2 Appendices". United States. doi:10.2172/4601. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4601.
@article{osti_4601,
title = {Routine Radiological Environmental Monitoring Plan, Volume 2 Appendices},
author = {Bechtel Nevada},
abstractNote = {Supporting material for the plan includes: QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR NTS AIR; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR WATER ON AND OFF THE NEVADA TEST SITE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR NTS BIOTA; QUALITY ASSURANCE, ANALYSIS, AND SAMPLING PLAN FOR DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING; DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS; VADOSE ZONE MONITORING PLAN CHECKLIST.},
doi = {10.2172/4601},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1998,
month =
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The U.S. Department of Energy manages the Nevada Test Site in a manner that meets evolving DOE Missions and responds to the concerns of affected and interested individuals and agencies. This Routine Radiological Monitoring Plan addressess complicance with DOE Orders 5400.1 and 5400.5 and other drivers requiring routine effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance on the Nevada Test Site. This monitoring plan, prepared in 1998, addresses the activities conducted onsite NTS under the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision. This radiological monitoring plan, prepared on behalf of the Nevada Test Site Landlord, brings together sitewide environmental surveillance; site-specific effluentmore » monitoring; and operational monitoring conducted by various missions, programs, and projects on the NTS. The plan provides an approach to identifying and conducting routine radiological monitoring at the NTS, based on integrated technical, scientific, and regulatory complicance data needs.« less
  • The Energy Security Act of 1980 established a program to provide financial assistance to private industry in the construction and operation of commercial-scale synthetic-fuels plants. The Cool Water Coal Gasification Program is one of the four projects awarded financial assistance. The Program agreed to comply with existing environmental-monitoring regulations and to develop an Environmental Monitoring Plan incorporating supplemental monitoring in the areas of water, air, solid waste, worker health and safety, and socioeconomic impacts during the period 1984-1989. As the first commercial-scale integrated gasification combined-cycle plant for generating energy from coal, the plant is designed to process a variety ofmore » coals with no liquid discharge, produce non-hazardous solid wastes, and produce very few air emissions. This report concludes the analysis of potential environmental impacts due to operation of this particular technology. Indicator parameters and correlations are discussed along with summaries of results while operating the main and quench gasifiers, and burning four types of coal. The extensive data demonstrate environmental acceptability of integrated coal gasification using both high-sulfur Eastern coals and low-sulfur Western coals; 97% sulfur removal was achieved.« less
  • The Energy Security Act of 1980 established a program to provide financial assistance to private industry in the construction and operation of commercial-scale synthetic-fuels plants. The Cool Water Coal Gasification Program is one of the four projects awarded financial assistance. This Program agreed to comply with existing environmental-monitoring regulations and to develop an Environmental Monitoring Plan incorporating supplemental monitoring in the areas of water, air, solid waste, worker health and safety, and socio-economic impacts during the period 1984-1989. As the first commercial-scale integrated gasification combined-cycle plant for generating energy from coal, the plant is designed to process a variety ofmore » coals with no liquid discharge, produce non-hazardous solid wastes, and produce very few air emissions. Monitoring data are to provide an information base for evaluating plant operations and for establishing information on environmental uncertainties associated with replication of synthetic-fuels facilities. Comprehensive Phase monitoring was conducted after the Commissioning Phase and start-up of plant operations was completed during February, 1985. Results include source monitoring, pollution-control performance, ambient-air monitoring, compliance monitoring, quality assurance/quality control, and problems associated with plant operations.« less
  • This report documents work perfomed in support of the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding the Department of Energy's Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas. Results of environmental measurements performed for the EIS are described. Descriptions are presented are presented of existing radiological conditions at the Pantex Plant and the two alternate sites, the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant near Burlington, Iowa, and the Hanford Site in Washington. Radiological impacts on these three sites by the proposed options and alternatives considered in the EIS are evaluated. Only impacts from routine operations are considered; impacts from accidents are treated in othermore » reports.« less
  • Goals of the task group were to identify the basic purpose for radiological environmental monitoring, develop a general rationale for such monitoring, and provide specific facility-oriented programs as examples of the basic rationale. This report represents the results of the group's considerations of these topics and focuses on the philosophical approach to be taken on several topics rather than on detailed methodology. Results of the considerations can be described as the art of radiological environmental monitoring. In that the group was unable to develop a tightly knit rationale for all the elements of such a program. Two major factors ledmore » to this: (1) the large number of possible nuclide-pathway combinations which threatened to result in specifying lower limits of detection (LLDs) much more restrictive than we considered practicable and (2) the significant number of public reassurance type measurement requirements which always remained and did not fit into a dose rationale. Therefore, the topics discussed and the example programs presented contain requirements related to both dose rationale and public reassurance. 3 tables.« less