skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: CO{sub 2} emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model

Abstract

Evaluating policies intended to reduce energy-related carbon dioxide emissions requires integration of many components. A notable dichotomy exists between bottom-up and top-down models for estimating the costs of reducing these emissions. The paper examines the conflicting approaches to these models and offers suggestions for policy makers. 33 refs., 5 figs., 2 tabs.

Authors:
; ;  [1]
  1. Simon Fraser Univ., British Columbia (Canada)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
416103
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
Energy Journal
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 17; Journal Issue: 4; Other Information: PBD: 1996
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY; CARBON DIOXIDE; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Citation Formats

Jaccard, M, Bailie, A, and Nyboer, J. CO{sub 2} emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model. United States: N. p., 1996. Web.
Jaccard, M, Bailie, A, & Nyboer, J. CO{sub 2} emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model. United States.
Jaccard, M, Bailie, A, and Nyboer, J. Tue . "CO{sub 2} emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model". United States.
@article{osti_416103,
title = {CO{sub 2} emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model},
author = {Jaccard, M and Bailie, A and Nyboer, J},
abstractNote = {Evaluating policies intended to reduce energy-related carbon dioxide emissions requires integration of many components. A notable dichotomy exists between bottom-up and top-down models for estimating the costs of reducing these emissions. The paper examines the conflicting approaches to these models and offers suggestions for policy makers. 33 refs., 5 figs., 2 tabs.},
doi = {},
journal = {Energy Journal},
number = 4,
volume = 17,
place = {United States},
year = {1996},
month = {12}
}