skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Predicting 232U Content in Uranium

Abstract

The minor isotope 232U may ultimately be used for detection or confirmation of uranium in a variety of applications. The primary advantage of 232 U as an indicator of the presence of enriched uranium is the plentiful and penetrating nature of the radiation emitted by its daughter radionuclide 208Tl. A possible drawback to measuring uranium via 232U is the relatively high uncertainty in 232U abundance both within and between material populations. An important step in assessing this problem is to ascertain what determines the 232U concentration within any particular sample of uranium. To this end, we here analyze the production and eventual enrichment of 232 U during fuel-cycle operations. The goal of this analysis is to allow approximate prediction of 232 U quantities, or at least some interpretation of the results of 232U measurements. We have found that 232U is produced via a number of pathways during reactor irradiation of uranium and is subsequently concentrated during the later enrichment of the uranium' s 235U Content. While exact calculations are nearly impossible for both the reactor-production and cascade-enrichment parts of the prediction problem, estimates and physical bounds can be provided as listed below and detailed within the body of the report.more » Even if precise calculations for the irradiation and enrichment were possible, the ultimate 212U concentration would still depend upon the detailed fuel-cycle history. Assuming that a thennal-diffusion cascade is used to produce highly enriched uranium (HEU), dilution of reactor-processed fuel at the cascade input and the long-term holdup of 232U within the cascade both affect the 232U concentration in the product. Similar issues could be expected to apply for the other isotope-separation technologies that are used in other countries. Results of this analysis are listed below: 0 The 232U concentration depends strongly on the uranium enrichment, with depleted uranium (DU) containing between 1600 and 8000 times less 232U than HEU does. * The 236U/232U concentration ratio in HEU is likely to be between 10{sup 6} and 2 x 10{sup 7}. 0 Plutonium-production reactors yield uranium with between I and 10 ppt of 232u. 0 Much higher 132U concentrations can be obtained in some situations. * Significant variation in the 232U concentration is inevitable. * Cascade enrichment increases the 232U concentration by a factor of at least 200, and possibly as much as 1000. 0 The actual 232U concentration depends upon the dilution at the cascade input.« less

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
2657
Report Number(s):
PNNL-12075
R&D Project: 30288; GC0401000; ON: DE00002657
DOE Contract Number:
AC06-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
05 NUCLEAR FUELS; Uranium 232; Isotope Ratio; Forecasting

Citation Formats

AJ Peurrung. Predicting 232U Content in Uranium. United States: N. p., 1999. Web. doi:10.2172/2657.
AJ Peurrung. Predicting 232U Content in Uranium. United States. doi:10.2172/2657.
AJ Peurrung. Thu . "Predicting 232U Content in Uranium". United States. doi:10.2172/2657. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2657.
@article{osti_2657,
title = {Predicting 232U Content in Uranium},
author = {AJ Peurrung},
abstractNote = {The minor isotope 232U may ultimately be used for detection or confirmation of uranium in a variety of applications. The primary advantage of 232 U as an indicator of the presence of enriched uranium is the plentiful and penetrating nature of the radiation emitted by its daughter radionuclide 208Tl. A possible drawback to measuring uranium via 232U is the relatively high uncertainty in 232U abundance both within and between material populations. An important step in assessing this problem is to ascertain what determines the 232U concentration within any particular sample of uranium. To this end, we here analyze the production and eventual enrichment of 232 U during fuel-cycle operations. The goal of this analysis is to allow approximate prediction of 232 U quantities, or at least some interpretation of the results of 232U measurements. We have found that 232U is produced via a number of pathways during reactor irradiation of uranium and is subsequently concentrated during the later enrichment of the uranium' s 235U Content. While exact calculations are nearly impossible for both the reactor-production and cascade-enrichment parts of the prediction problem, estimates and physical bounds can be provided as listed below and detailed within the body of the report. Even if precise calculations for the irradiation and enrichment were possible, the ultimate 212U concentration would still depend upon the detailed fuel-cycle history. Assuming that a thennal-diffusion cascade is used to produce highly enriched uranium (HEU), dilution of reactor-processed fuel at the cascade input and the long-term holdup of 232U within the cascade both affect the 232U concentration in the product. Similar issues could be expected to apply for the other isotope-separation technologies that are used in other countries. Results of this analysis are listed below: 0 The 232U concentration depends strongly on the uranium enrichment, with depleted uranium (DU) containing between 1600 and 8000 times less 232U than HEU does. * The 236U/232U concentration ratio in HEU is likely to be between 10{sup 6} and 2 x 10{sup 7}. 0 Plutonium-production reactors yield uranium with between I and 10 ppt of 232u. 0 Much higher 132U concentrations can be obtained in some situations. * Significant variation in the 232U concentration is inevitable. * Cascade enrichment increases the 232U concentration by a factor of at least 200, and possibly as much as 1000. 0 The actual 232U concentration depends upon the dilution at the cascade input.},
doi = {10.2172/2657},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 1999},
month = {Thu Jan 07 00:00:00 EST 1999}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • This report describes a standardized methodology used by researchers from the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS) (Energy and Environment Directorate) and the Environmental Radiochemistry Group (Chemistry and Materials Science Directorate) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) for the full isotopic analysis of uranium from solution. The methodology has largely been developed for use in characterizing the uranium composition of selected nuclear materials but may also be applicable to environmental studies and assessments of public, military or occupational exposures to uranium using in-vitro bioassay monitoring techniques. Uranium isotope concentrations and isotopic ratios are measured using a combination of Multimore » Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (MC ICP-MS), Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) and Alpha Spectrometry.« less
  • The one-dimensional pin-cell analysis code CELL-2 has recently been released by EPRI as part of a major core physics design package referred to as ARMP-02. Within this package, CELL-2 is used to parameterize different sections of a fuel assembly (fuel cell, burnable poison cell, guide tube, etc.) at different exposure points and under different core conditions (moderator and fuel temperature, void or soluble boron concentration, etc.). The adequacy of CELL-2 for core physics calculations has been validated in the ARMP-02 documentation. The objective of the present work is to demonstrate its suitability for use in calculating the isotopic compositions ofmore » spent fuel. To validate the accuracy of CELL-2 calculations performed with the ENDF/B-V cross section libraries, six experiments for which measured isotopics data is available have been analyzed. This study demonstrates that CELL-2, using the ENDF/B-V cross section library, produces reliable predictions for the isotopics of exposed fuel. The calculated results nearly always agree within 5% of the measured values, and are most often within the claimed experimental uncertainty of the measurements. In the few instances where the disagreement exceeds 5%, the cause can usually be attributed to significant non-uniformities in the reactor lattice configuration, for which the one-dimensional supercell model in CELL-2 is expected to break down, or to uncertainties in the fuel temperatures. Therefore the present results, along with the conclusions of the earlier work, provide strong evidence that the ENDF/B-V CELL-2 code will be able to accurately predict the reactivity of exposed LWR fuel pins in addition to their isotopic contents. 32 refs., 13 figs., 32 tabs.« less