Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Caution on Using Tetrahydrofuran for Processing Crystalline Silica Samples From Engineered Stone for XRD Analysis

Journal Article · · Annals of work exposures and health
Abstract

We conducted laboratory experiments to investigate a suspected effect of tetrahydrofuran (THF) on quantifying crystalline silica in samples collected from working with engineered stone when THF is used to process samples prior to the X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Two groups of samples from grinding either engineered stone or granite were simultaneously taken from a laboratory testing system, with one group of samples using THF for processing and another group using muffle furnace for ashing. For each stone type, we also tested four levels of respirable dust loading on the samples by varying the grinding time from 1 to 8 min. Statistical analysis of the experimental results on crystalline silica contents of the two groups of samples showed that the difference between the two methods was not significant (P ≥ 0.05) for the granite at all four levels of respirable dust loading and for the engineered stone at the two levels of respirable dust loading greater than 0.5 mg. However, the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was significantly lower (P = 0.001) than that from using muffle furnace ashing for engineered stone when the respirable dust loading levels were less than 0.5 mg. For the engineered stone dust samples with grinding times of 1 and 2 min, the average respirable dust loading was about 0.19 and 0.34 mg, respectively; while the crystalline silica content from using THF processing was 30.9 and 21.5% lower than that from using muffle furnace ashing, respectively. Since most full-shift samples from field assessments in this industry are expected to have respirable dust loading less than 0.5 mg, muffle furnace or radio frequency plasma ashing should be specified as the preferred sample processing method instead of the THF processing method for quantification of crystalline silica when engineered stone is expected to present to avoid artificially reduced silica content values, which are likely caused by the reactions between THF and the resins in engineered stone.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
DOE Contract Number:
SC0014664
OSTI ID:
2425602
Journal Information:
Annals of work exposures and health, Journal Name: Annals of work exposures and health Journal Issue: 9 Vol. 66; ISSN 2398-7308
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (8)

Severe Silicosis in Engineered Stone Fabrication Workers — California, Colorado, Texas, and Washington, 2017–2019 journal September 2019
On the Characterization of the Generation Rate and Size-Dependent Crystalline Silica Content of the Dust from Cutting Fiber Cement Siding journal September 2015
Artificial Stone Silicosis journal August 2012
Prevalencia de silicosis en una marmolería tras la exposición a conglomerados de cuarzo journal January 2011
Artificial stone-associated silicosis: a rapidly emerging occupational lung disease journal September 2017
Artificial stone-associated silicosis in Belgium journal November 2018
Outbreak of silicosis in Spanish quartz conglomerate workers journal December 2013
The Composition of Emissions from Sawing Corian®, a Solid Surface Composite Material journal February 2019

Similar Records

Characterization of the Emissions and Crystalline Silica Content of Airborne Dust Generated from Grinding Natural and Engineered Stones
Journal Article · 2022 · Annals of work exposures and health · OSTI ID:2425606

Regulatory implications of airborne respirable free silica variability in underground coal mines
Journal Article · 1991 · American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal; (United States) · OSTI ID:5599960

Airborne crystalline silica concentrations at coal-fired power plants associated with coal fly ash
Journal Article · 2006 · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · OSTI ID:20781602