skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Inaccuracies in Sneddon`s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis

Abstract

Methods currently used for analyzing nanoindentation load-displacement data to determine a material`s hardness and elastic modulus are based on Sneddon`s solution for the indentation of an elastic half-space by a rigid axisymmetric indenter. Although this solution is widely used, no attempts have been made to determine how well it works for conditions of finite deformation, as is the case in most nanoindentation experiments with sharp indenters. Analytical and finite element results are presented which show that corrections to Sneddon`s solution are needed if it is to be accurately applied to the case of deformation by a rigid cone. Failure to make the corrections results in an underestimation of the load and contact stiffness and an overestimation of the elastic modulus, with the magnitude of the errors depending on the angle of the indenter and Poisson`s ratio of the half-space. For a rigid conical indenter with a half-included tip angle of 70.3{degrees}, i.e., the angle giving the same area-to-depth ratio as the Berkovich indenter used commonly in nanoindentation experiments, the underestimation of the load and contact stiffness and overestimation of the elastic modulus may be as large as 13%. It is shown that a simple first order correction can be achievedmore » by redefining the effective angle of the indenter in terms of the elastic constants. Implications for the interpretation of nanoindentation data are discussed.« less

Authors:
;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Rice Univ., Houston, TX (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
230354
Report Number(s):
CONF-960401-16
ON: DE96009404; TRN: 96:002999
DOE Contract Number:  
AC05-96OR22464
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Spring meeting of the Materials Research Society (MRS), San Francisco, CA (United States), 8-12 Apr 1996; Other Information: PBD: 1996
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING NOT INCLUDED IN OTHER CATEGORIES; HARDNESS; MEASURING METHODS; ANALYTICAL SOLUTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATERIALS TESTING; ELASTICITY

Citation Formats

Bolshakov, A, and Pharr, G M. Inaccuracies in Sneddon`s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis. United States: N. p., 1996. Web.
Bolshakov, A, & Pharr, G M. Inaccuracies in Sneddon`s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis. United States.
Bolshakov, A, and Pharr, G M. Wed . "Inaccuracies in Sneddon`s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/230354.
@article{osti_230354,
title = {Inaccuracies in Sneddon`s solution for elastic indentation by a rigid cone and their implications for nanoindentation data analysis},
author = {Bolshakov, A and Pharr, G M},
abstractNote = {Methods currently used for analyzing nanoindentation load-displacement data to determine a material`s hardness and elastic modulus are based on Sneddon`s solution for the indentation of an elastic half-space by a rigid axisymmetric indenter. Although this solution is widely used, no attempts have been made to determine how well it works for conditions of finite deformation, as is the case in most nanoindentation experiments with sharp indenters. Analytical and finite element results are presented which show that corrections to Sneddon`s solution are needed if it is to be accurately applied to the case of deformation by a rigid cone. Failure to make the corrections results in an underestimation of the load and contact stiffness and an overestimation of the elastic modulus, with the magnitude of the errors depending on the angle of the indenter and Poisson`s ratio of the half-space. For a rigid conical indenter with a half-included tip angle of 70.3{degrees}, i.e., the angle giving the same area-to-depth ratio as the Berkovich indenter used commonly in nanoindentation experiments, the underestimation of the load and contact stiffness and overestimation of the elastic modulus may be as large as 13%. It is shown that a simple first order correction can be achieved by redefining the effective angle of the indenter in terms of the elastic constants. Implications for the interpretation of nanoindentation data are discussed.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {1996},
month = {5}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share: