SUFT408: On the Determination of Equivalent Squares for Rectangular Small MV Photon Fields
Abstract
Purpose: It is common practice to tabulate dosimetric data like output factors, scatter factors and detector signal correction factors for a set of square fields. In order to get the data for an arbitrary field, it is mapped to an equivalent square, having the same scatter as the field of interest. For rectangular fields both, tabulated data and empiric formula exist. We tested the applicability of such rules for very small fields. Methods: Using the MonteCarlo method (EGSnrcdoseRZ), the dose to a point in 10cm depth in water was calculated for cylindrical impinging fluence distributions. Radii were from 0.5mm to 11.5mm with 1mm thickness of the rings. Different photon energies were investigated. With these data a matrix was constructed assigning the amount of dose to the field center to each matrix element. By summing up the elements belonging to a certain field, the dose for an arbitrary point in 10cm depth could be determined. This was done for rectangles up to 21mm side length. Comparing the dose to square field results, equivalent squares could be assigned. The results were compared to using the geometrical mean and the 4Xperimeter/area rule. Results: For side length differences less than 2mm, the difference betweenmore »
 Authors:
 University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg (Germany)
 Publication Date:
 OSTI Identifier:
 22649004
 Resource Type:
 Journal Article
 Resource Relation:
 Journal Name: Medical Physics; Journal Volume: 43; Journal Issue: 6; Other Information: (c) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; 61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; CYLINDRICAL CONFIGURATION; MATRICES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHOTONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
Citation Formats
Sauer, OA, Wegener, S, and Exner, F. SUFT408: On the Determination of Equivalent Squares for Rectangular Small MV Photon Fields. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.1118/1.4956593.
Sauer, OA, Wegener, S, & Exner, F. SUFT408: On the Determination of Equivalent Squares for Rectangular Small MV Photon Fields. United States. doi:10.1118/1.4956593.
Sauer, OA, Wegener, S, and Exner, F. Wed .
"SUFT408: On the Determination of Equivalent Squares for Rectangular Small MV Photon Fields". United States.
doi:10.1118/1.4956593.
@article{osti_22649004,
title = {SUFT408: On the Determination of Equivalent Squares for Rectangular Small MV Photon Fields},
author = {Sauer, OA and Wegener, S and Exner, F},
abstractNote = {Purpose: It is common practice to tabulate dosimetric data like output factors, scatter factors and detector signal correction factors for a set of square fields. In order to get the data for an arbitrary field, it is mapped to an equivalent square, having the same scatter as the field of interest. For rectangular fields both, tabulated data and empiric formula exist. We tested the applicability of such rules for very small fields. Methods: Using the MonteCarlo method (EGSnrcdoseRZ), the dose to a point in 10cm depth in water was calculated for cylindrical impinging fluence distributions. Radii were from 0.5mm to 11.5mm with 1mm thickness of the rings. Different photon energies were investigated. With these data a matrix was constructed assigning the amount of dose to the field center to each matrix element. By summing up the elements belonging to a certain field, the dose for an arbitrary point in 10cm depth could be determined. This was done for rectangles up to 21mm side length. Comparing the dose to square field results, equivalent squares could be assigned. The results were compared to using the geometrical mean and the 4Xperimeter/area rule. Results: For side length differences less than 2mm, the difference between all methods was in general less than 0.2mm. For more elongated fields, relevant differences of more than 1mm and up to 3mm for the fields investigated occurred. The mean square side length calculated from both empiric formulas fitted much better, deviating hardly more than 1mm and for the very elongated fields only. Conclusion: For small rectangular photon fields, deviating only moderately from square both investigated empiric methods are sufficiently accurate. As the deviations often differ regarding their sign, using the mean improves the accuracy and the useable elongation range. For ratios larger than 2, MonteCarlo generated data are recommended. SW is funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA481/101)},
doi = {10.1118/1.4956593},
journal = {Medical Physics},
number = 6,
volume = 43,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Purpose: Different detector properties influence their responses especially in field sizes below the lateral electron range. Due to the finite active volume, the detector density and electron perturbation at other structural parts, the response factor is in general field size dependent. We aimed to visualize and separate the main effects contributing to detector behavior for a variety of detector types. This was achieved in an experimental setup, shielding the field center. Thus, effects caused by scattered radiation could be examined separately. Methods: Signal ratios for field sizes down to 8 mm (SSD 90 cm, water depth 10 cm) of amore »

SUFT572: Small Fields Output Factors Measurement and Correction Factor Determination for Several Active and Passive Detectors
Purpose: To measure the output factor (OF) and output correction factors (OCF) of small circular cones using various active and passive detectors. Methods: The OF of BrainLab circular cones of 4, 6, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15mm diameter were measured isocentrically at 15mm depth for 6 MV Xrays at 1000 MU/min from NovalisTx Linac using high resolution diodes (SFD, Edge, PTW60008), plastic scintillator (ExtradinW1), small ionization chamber (CC01), EBT3 film and Al2O3:C OSLDs (nanoDot). OCF was calculated as a ratio of the OF of each detector relative to EBT3. Long term overall measurement uncertainty were estimated from the 15 repeatmore » 
SUFT385: Evaluation the Influence of 6 and 15MV Photon Energies of Intensitymodulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Purpose: This study was aimed to study the effects oflow and highenergy intensitymodulated (IMRT)photon beams on the planning of target volume and thecritical organs in cases of prostate cancer. Methods: Thirty plans were generated using either 6 MV or 15 MValone, and both 6 and 15 MV beams. For each plangenerated using suitable planning objectives and doseconstraints, which was set to be identical except thebeam energy. The plans were analyzed in terms of targetcoverage, conformity, and homogeneity regardless ofbeam energy. Results: Mean percentage of V 70Gy ofrectal wall in 6 MV, 15 MV and mixedenergy plans was16.9%, 17.8%, and 16.4%,more » 
SUFT461: Dosimetric Evaluation of Indigenous Farmer Type Chamber FAR65 GB for Reference Dosimetry of FFF MV Photon Beam
Purpose: Indigenous Farmer type chamber FAR 65 GB is a reference class 0.6 cc ion chamber. It can be used for dosimetric evaluation of photon and high energy electron beams. We studied dosimetric characteristics of the chamber for 6MV and 10MV Flattening filter free FFF photon beams available on trueBEAM STx Linac. Methods: The study was carried out on trueBEAM STx Linac having 6 and 10 MV FFF photon beam with maximum dose rate 1400 and 2400 MU per min respectively. The dosimetric device to be evaluated is Rosalina Instruments FAR 65GB Ion Chamber with active volume 0.65 cc, totalmore » 
SUET432: Field Size Influence On the Electron and Photon Spectra Within Small MV Field Detectors
Purpose: To investigate the influence of photon field size on the electron and photon fluence spectra in the active volume of small field detectors. Methods: The PENELOPE MC system based usercode PenEasy was used to calculate the material influence on the spectra by scoring the differential fluence in inserts of silicon, carbon, phosphorus and aluminium having 3 mm diameter and height. The spectra were then calculated inside the active volume of eleven detectors (ion chambers and solidstate detectors) whose geometry was simulated with great detail. The inserts/detectors were placed at 10 cm depth in a 30 cm x 30 cmmore »