skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Bayesian seismic inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian approach for seismic inversion to estimate acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies within the reservoir conditioned to post-stack seismic and well data. The link between elastic and petrophysical properties is given by a joint prior distribution for the logarithm of impedance and porosity, based on a rock-physics model. The well conditioning is performed through a background model obtained by well log interpolation. Two different approaches are presented: in the first approach, the prior is defined by a single Gaussian distribution, whereas in the second approach it is defined by a Gaussian mixture to represent the well data multimodal distribution and link the Gaussian components to different geological lithofacies. The forward model is based on a linearized convolutional model. For the single Gaussian case, we obtain an analytical expression for the posterior distribution, resulting in a fast algorithm to compute the solution of the inverse problem, i.e. the posterior distribution of acoustic impedance and porosity as well as the facies probability given the observed data. For the Gaussian mixture prior, it is not possible to obtain the distributions analytically, hence we propose a Gibbs algorithm to perform the posterior sampling and obtain several reservoir model realizations, allowing anmore » uncertainty analysis of the estimated properties and lithofacies. Both methodologies are applied to a real seismic dataset with three wells to obtain 3D models of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies. The methodologies are validated through a blind well test and compared to a standard Bayesian inversion approach. Using the probability of the reservoir lithofacies, we also compute a 3D isosurface probability model of the main oil reservoir in the studied field.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ;  [1];  [3];  [4]
  1. Physics Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis (Brazil)
  2. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie (United States)
  3. Informatic and Statistics Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis (Brazil)
  4. Petrobras Research Center, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22622286
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Journal of Computational Physics; Journal Volume: 336; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; 97 MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING; ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHMS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DISTRIBUTION; GAUSS FUNCTION; IMPEDANCE; INTERPOLATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POROSITY; PROBABILITY; ROCKS; STACKS

Citation Formats

Passos de Figueiredo, Leandro, E-mail: leandrop.fgr@gmail.com, Grana, Dario, Santos, Marcio, Figueiredo, Wagner, Roisenberg, Mauro, and Schwedersky Neto, Guenther. Bayesian seismic inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/J.JCP.2017.02.013.
Passos de Figueiredo, Leandro, E-mail: leandrop.fgr@gmail.com, Grana, Dario, Santos, Marcio, Figueiredo, Wagner, Roisenberg, Mauro, & Schwedersky Neto, Guenther. Bayesian seismic inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies. United States. doi:10.1016/J.JCP.2017.02.013.
Passos de Figueiredo, Leandro, E-mail: leandrop.fgr@gmail.com, Grana, Dario, Santos, Marcio, Figueiredo, Wagner, Roisenberg, Mauro, and Schwedersky Neto, Guenther. Mon . "Bayesian seismic inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies". United States. doi:10.1016/J.JCP.2017.02.013.
@article{osti_22622286,
title = {Bayesian seismic inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the joint estimation of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies},
author = {Passos de Figueiredo, Leandro, E-mail: leandrop.fgr@gmail.com and Grana, Dario and Santos, Marcio and Figueiredo, Wagner and Roisenberg, Mauro and Schwedersky Neto, Guenther},
abstractNote = {We propose a Bayesian approach for seismic inversion to estimate acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies within the reservoir conditioned to post-stack seismic and well data. The link between elastic and petrophysical properties is given by a joint prior distribution for the logarithm of impedance and porosity, based on a rock-physics model. The well conditioning is performed through a background model obtained by well log interpolation. Two different approaches are presented: in the first approach, the prior is defined by a single Gaussian distribution, whereas in the second approach it is defined by a Gaussian mixture to represent the well data multimodal distribution and link the Gaussian components to different geological lithofacies. The forward model is based on a linearized convolutional model. For the single Gaussian case, we obtain an analytical expression for the posterior distribution, resulting in a fast algorithm to compute the solution of the inverse problem, i.e. the posterior distribution of acoustic impedance and porosity as well as the facies probability given the observed data. For the Gaussian mixture prior, it is not possible to obtain the distributions analytically, hence we propose a Gibbs algorithm to perform the posterior sampling and obtain several reservoir model realizations, allowing an uncertainty analysis of the estimated properties and lithofacies. Both methodologies are applied to a real seismic dataset with three wells to obtain 3D models of acoustic impedance, porosity and lithofacies. The methodologies are validated through a blind well test and compared to a standard Bayesian inversion approach. Using the probability of the reservoir lithofacies, we also compute a 3D isosurface probability model of the main oil reservoir in the studied field.},
doi = {10.1016/J.JCP.2017.02.013},
journal = {Journal of Computational Physics},
number = ,
volume = 336,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}