skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: Open techniques

Abstract

Uncertainty is virtually unavoidable in environmental impact assessments (EIAs). From the literature related to treating and managing uncertainty, we have identified specific techniques for coping with uncertainty in EIAs. Here, we have focused on basic steps in the decision-making process that take place within an EIA setting. More specifically, we have identified uncertainties involved in each decision-making step and discussed the extent to which these can be treated and managed in the context of an activity or project that may have environmental impacts. To further demonstrate the relevance of the techniques identified, we have examined the extent to which the EIA guidelines currently used in Colombia consider and provide guidance on managing the uncertainty involved in these assessments. Some points that should be considered in order to provide greater robustness in impact assessments in Colombia have been identified. These include the management of stakeholder values, the systematic generation of project options, and their associated impacts as well as the associated management actions, and the evaluation of uncertainties and assumptions. We believe that the relevant and specific techniques reported here can be a reference for future evaluations of other EIA guidelines in different countries. - Highlights: • uncertainty is unavoidable inmore » environmental impact assessments, EIAs; • we have identified some open techniques to EIAs for treating and managing uncertainty in these assessments; • points for improvement that should be considered in order to provide greater robustness in EIAs in Colombia have been identified; • the paper provides substantiated a reference for possible examinations of EIAs guidelines in other countries.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. IceBridge Research Institutea, Universiteit Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede (Netherlands)
  2. Universiteit Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede (Netherlands)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22589253
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review; Journal Volume: 60; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; COLOMBIA; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Citation Formats

Cardenas, Ibsen C., E-mail: c.cardenas@utwente.nl, and Halman, Johannes I.M., E-mail: J.I.M.Halman@utwente.nl. Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: Open techniques. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/J.EIAR.2016.02.006.
Cardenas, Ibsen C., E-mail: c.cardenas@utwente.nl, & Halman, Johannes I.M., E-mail: J.I.M.Halman@utwente.nl. Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: Open techniques. United States. doi:10.1016/J.EIAR.2016.02.006.
Cardenas, Ibsen C., E-mail: c.cardenas@utwente.nl, and Halman, Johannes I.M., E-mail: J.I.M.Halman@utwente.nl. 2016. "Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: Open techniques". United States. doi:10.1016/J.EIAR.2016.02.006.
@article{osti_22589253,
title = {Coping with uncertainty in environmental impact assessments: Open techniques},
author = {Cardenas, Ibsen C., E-mail: c.cardenas@utwente.nl and Halman, Johannes I.M., E-mail: J.I.M.Halman@utwente.nl},
abstractNote = {Uncertainty is virtually unavoidable in environmental impact assessments (EIAs). From the literature related to treating and managing uncertainty, we have identified specific techniques for coping with uncertainty in EIAs. Here, we have focused on basic steps in the decision-making process that take place within an EIA setting. More specifically, we have identified uncertainties involved in each decision-making step and discussed the extent to which these can be treated and managed in the context of an activity or project that may have environmental impacts. To further demonstrate the relevance of the techniques identified, we have examined the extent to which the EIA guidelines currently used in Colombia consider and provide guidance on managing the uncertainty involved in these assessments. Some points that should be considered in order to provide greater robustness in impact assessments in Colombia have been identified. These include the management of stakeholder values, the systematic generation of project options, and their associated impacts as well as the associated management actions, and the evaluation of uncertainties and assumptions. We believe that the relevant and specific techniques reported here can be a reference for future evaluations of other EIA guidelines in different countries. - Highlights: • uncertainty is unavoidable in environmental impact assessments, EIAs; • we have identified some open techniques to EIAs for treating and managing uncertainty in these assessments; • points for improvement that should be considered in order to provide greater robustness in EIAs in Colombia have been identified; • the paper provides substantiated a reference for possible examinations of EIAs guidelines in other countries.},
doi = {10.1016/J.EIAR.2016.02.006},
journal = {Environmental Impact Assessment Review},
number = ,
volume = 60,
place = {United States},
year = 2016,
month = 9
}
  • The three key common sense principles followed in TVA's decision on the soil erosion and stream blockage problem were also important factors in developing their position on acid precipitation. Despite uncertainties associated with acid precipitation, especially cause-and-effect relationships, facts were considered. A wealth of circumstantial evidence was revealed about the risks to sensitive ecosystems posed by acid precipitation. In order to minimize these risks, TVA decided to adopt the position that emissions should not be increased and, in fact, should be decreased until more information was available. A feedback system is established for fine tuning the program as more informationmore » is made known. An initial modest emissions cap could have served as the first step in an approach to controlling acid precipitation precursors in 1982. Decision makers cannot afford to wait until definitive answers to all uncertainties are reached. 8 references, 2 figures.« less
  • Most public health risk assessments assume and combine a series of average, conservative, and worst-case values to derive a conservative point estimate of risk. This procedure has major limitations. This paper demonstrates a new methodology for extended uncertainty analyses in public health risk assessments using Monte Carlo techniques. The extended method begins as do some conventional methods--with the preparation of a spreadsheet to estimate exposure and risk. This method, however, continues by modeling key inputs as random variables described by probability density functions (PDFs). Overall, the technique provides a quantitative way to estimate the probability distributions for exposure and healthmore » risks within the validity of the model used. As an example, this paper presents a simplified case study for children playing in soils contaminated with benzene and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).« less
  • Internationally the inclusion of health within environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been shown to be limited. While Australian EIA documentation has not been studied empirically to date, deficiencies in practice have been documented. This research developed an audit tool to undertake a qualitative descriptive analysis of 22 Major Project EAs in New South Wales, Australia. Results showed that health and wellbeing impacts were not considered explicitly. They were, however, included indirectly in the identification of traditional public health exposures associated with the physical environment and to a lesser extent the inclusion of social and economic impacts. However, no health datamore » was used to inform any of the assessments, there was no reference to causal pathways between exposures or determinants and physical or mental health effects, and there was no inclusion of the differential distribution of exposures or health impacts on different populations. The results add conceptually and practically to the long standing integration debate, showing that health is in a position to add value to the EIA process as an explicit part of standard environmental, social and economic considerations. However, to overcome the consistently documented barriers to integrating health in EIA, capacity must be developed amongst EIA professionals, led by the health sector, to progress health related knowledge and tools.« less
  • Assessing the significance of environmental impacts is one of the most important and all together difficult processes of Environmental Impact Assessment. This is largely due to the multicriteria nature of the problem. To date, decision techniques used in the process suffer from two drawbacks, namely the problem of compensation and the problem of identification of the 'exact boundary' between sub-ranges. This article discusses these issues and proposes a methodology for determining the significance of environmental impacts based on comparative and sensitivity analyses using the Electre TRI technique. An application of the methodology for the environmental assessment of a Power Plantmore » project within the Valencian Region (Spain) is presented, and its performance evaluated. It is concluded that contrary to other techniques, Electre TRI automatically identifies those cases where allocation of significance categories is most difficult and, when combined with sensitivity analysis, offers greatest robustness in the face of variation in weights of the significance attributes. Likewise, this research demonstrates the efficacy of systematic comparison between Electre TRI and sum-based techniques, in the solution of assignment problems. The proposed methodology can therefore be regarded as a successful aid to the decision-maker, who will ultimately take the final decision.« less
  • The United States Department of Energy must determine how risks are to be assessed, managed and communicated at its many sites with radiological and chemical contamination. One often overlooked component of risk and impact assessments is the impact of environmental remedial actions on cultural groups proximate to contaminated sites. Cultural impact assessments should be undertaken because of both the importance of one's culture to one's quality of life and the role they could play in augmenting sound human health risk assessments. This paper presents a basis for why cultural impact assessments should be considered and a model for how theymore » might be undertaken.« less