skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: SU-E-T-38: A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA

Abstract

Purpose: To compare and contrast two commercial SRS QA phantoms. Methods: Both phantoms were evaluated in terms of their ease of setup as well as the time required to switch inserts for different tests. They were both used to evaluate the coincidence of the radiation and laser isocenters of a linear accelerator. End-to-end dosimetric tests were also performed using both ion chambers and films along two planes through the center of the phantoms. Since one phantom allows for multiple ion chamber orientations, a test was also performed to determine the effect of having the chamber oriented along the radiation beam axis’. Results: Changing inserts took 2 minutes on average for one phantom compared to 5 minutes for the other. The laser/radiation isocenter coincidence as determined from each phantom showed a maximum difference of 0.2mm. Ion chamber results were within 0.5% of the expected values when the chamber was perpendicular to the beams but measured a 3% underdose when the chamber was along the beam direction. Gamma (2%,2mm) pass rates of corresponding films were within 1% between phantoms. Conclusion: The results of the corresponding tests run on both phantoms were comparable, showing that the phantoms were equivalent for the subset ofmore » SRS QA tests run here. However, the under dose observed when the chamber was parallel to the beam direction suggests that this configuration should be avoided.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ;  [1]
  1. University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22545171
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Medical Physics; Journal Volume: 42; Journal Issue: 6; Other Information: (c) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; IONIZATION CHAMBERS; LASERS; LINEAR ACCELERATORS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES

Citation Formats

Sarkar, V, Huang, L, Huang, Y, Szegedi, M, Rassiah-Szegedi, P, Zhao, H, and Salter, B. SU-E-T-38: A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1118/1.4924399.
Sarkar, V, Huang, L, Huang, Y, Szegedi, M, Rassiah-Szegedi, P, Zhao, H, & Salter, B. SU-E-T-38: A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA. United States. doi:10.1118/1.4924399.
Sarkar, V, Huang, L, Huang, Y, Szegedi, M, Rassiah-Szegedi, P, Zhao, H, and Salter, B. Mon . "SU-E-T-38: A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA". United States. doi:10.1118/1.4924399.
@article{osti_22545171,
title = {SU-E-T-38: A Head to Head Comparison of Two Commercial Phantoms Used for SRS QA},
author = {Sarkar, V and Huang, L and Huang, Y and Szegedi, M and Rassiah-Szegedi, P and Zhao, H and Salter, B},
abstractNote = {Purpose: To compare and contrast two commercial SRS QA phantoms. Methods: Both phantoms were evaluated in terms of their ease of setup as well as the time required to switch inserts for different tests. They were both used to evaluate the coincidence of the radiation and laser isocenters of a linear accelerator. End-to-end dosimetric tests were also performed using both ion chambers and films along two planes through the center of the phantoms. Since one phantom allows for multiple ion chamber orientations, a test was also performed to determine the effect of having the chamber oriented along the radiation beam axis’. Results: Changing inserts took 2 minutes on average for one phantom compared to 5 minutes for the other. The laser/radiation isocenter coincidence as determined from each phantom showed a maximum difference of 0.2mm. Ion chamber results were within 0.5% of the expected values when the chamber was perpendicular to the beams but measured a 3% underdose when the chamber was along the beam direction. Gamma (2%,2mm) pass rates of corresponding films were within 1% between phantoms. Conclusion: The results of the corresponding tests run on both phantoms were comparable, showing that the phantoms were equivalent for the subset of SRS QA tests run here. However, the under dose observed when the chamber was parallel to the beam direction suggests that this configuration should be avoided.},
doi = {10.1118/1.4924399},
journal = {Medical Physics},
number = 6,
volume = 42,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}