Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 (United States)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545-0001 (United States)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08543-4000 (United States)
A new module, Guided Ligand Replacement (GLR), has been developed in Phenix to increase the ease and success rate of ligand placement when prior protein-ligand complexes are available. The process of iterative structure-based drug design involves the X-ray crystal structure determination of upwards of 100 ligands with the same general scaffold (i.e. chemotype) complexed with very similar, if not identical, protein targets. In conjunction with insights from computational models and assays, this collection of crystal structures is analyzed to improve potency, to achieve better selectivity and to reduce liabilities such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology. Current methods for modeling ligands into electron-density maps typically do not utilize information on how similar ligands bound in related structures. Even if the electron density is of sufficient quality and resolution to allow de novo placement, the process can take considerable time as the size, complexity and torsional degrees of freedom of the ligands increase. A new module, Guided Ligand Replacement (GLR), was developed in Phenix to increase the ease and success rate of ligand placement when prior protein–ligand complexes are available. At the heart of GLR is an algorithm based on graph theory that associates atoms in the target ligand with analogous atoms in the reference ligand. Based on this correspondence, a set of coordinates is generated for the target ligand. GLR is especially useful in two situations: (i) modeling a series of large, flexible, complicated or macrocyclic ligands in successive structures and (ii) modeling ligands as part of a refinement pipeline that can automatically select a reference structure. Even in those cases for which no reference structure is available, if there are multiple copies of the bound ligand per asymmetric unit GLR offers an efficient way to complete the model after the first ligand has been placed. In all of these applications, GLR leverages prior knowledge from earlier structures to facilitate ligand placement in the current structure.
- OSTI ID:
- 22347810
- Journal Information:
- Acta Crystallographica. Section D: Biological Crystallography, Vol. 70, Issue Pt 1; Other Information: PMCID: PMC3919265; PMID: 24419386; PUBLISHER-ID: lv5054; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3919265; Copyright (c) Klei et al. 2014; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0907-4449
- Country of Publication:
- Denmark
- Language:
- English
Probing the influence of non-covalent contact networks identified by charge density analysis on the oxidoreductase BacC
|
journal | February 2017 |
The solvent component of macromolecular crystals
|
journal | April 2015 |
Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix
|
journal | October 2019 |
Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix.
|
text | January 2019 |
Similar Records
Comparative Assessment of Pose Prediction Accuracy in RNA–Ligand Docking
The use of biophysical methods increases success in obtaining liganded crystal structures