skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Burnout in United States Academic Chairs of Radiation Oncology Programs

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (United States)
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland (United States)
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York (United States)
  5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
  6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (United States)
  7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ilinois (United States)

Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the self-reported prevalence of burnout in chairs of academic radiation oncology departments, to identify factors contributing to burnout, and to compare the prevalence of burnout with that seen in other academic chair groups. Methods and Materials: An anonymous online survey was administered to the membership of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs (SCAROP). Burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Results: Questionnaires were returned from 66 of 87 chairs (76% response rate). Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported satisfaction with their current positions. Common major stressors were budget deficits and human resource issues. One-quarter of chairs reported that it was at least moderately likely that they would step down in the next 1 to 2 years; these individuals demonstrated significantly higher emotional exhaustion. Twenty-five percent of respondents met the MBI-HSS criteria for low burnout, 75% for moderate burnout, and none for high burnout. Group MBI-HSS subscale scores demonstrated a pattern of moderate emotional exhaustion, low depersonalization, and moderate personal accomplishment, comparing favorably with other specialties. Conclusions: This is the first study of burnout in radiation oncology chairs with a high response rate and using a validated psychometric tool. Radiation oncology chairs share similar major stressors to other chair groups, but they demonstrate relatively high job satisfaction and lower burnout. Emotional exhaustion may contribute to the anticipated turnover in coming years. Further efforts addressing individual and institutional factors associated with burnout may improve the relationship with work of chairs and other department members.

OSTI ID:
22283352
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 88, Issue 2; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Stress and Burnout Among Residency Program Directors in United States Radiation Oncology Programs
Journal Article · Sun Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2015 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22283352

Burnout Evaluation of Radiation Residents Nationwide: Results of a Survey of United States Residents
Journal Article · Wed Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:22283352

The incidence of burnout or compassion fatigue in medical dosimetrists as a function of various stress and psychologic factors
Journal Article · Mon Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · Medical Dosimetry · OSTI ID:22283352