skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Baseline effects on carbon footprints of biofuels: The case of wood

Journal Article · · Environmental Impact Assessment Review
 [1];  [2]
  1. Atlantic Consulting, 8136 Gattikon (Switzerland)
  2. ETH, Berghaldenstrasse 46, 8800 Thalwil (Switzerland)

As biofuel usage has boomed over the past decade, so has research and regulatory interest in its carbon accounting. This paper examines one aspect of that carbon accounting: the baseline, i.e. the reference case against which other conditions or changes can be compared. A literature search and analysis identified four baseline types: no baseline; reference point; marginal fossil fuel; and biomass opportunity cost. The fourth one, biomass opportunity cost, is defined in more detail, because this is not done elsewhere in the literature. The four baselines are then applied to the carbon footprint of a wood-fired power plant. The footprint of the resulting wood-fired electricity varies dramatically, according to the type of baseline. Baseline type is also found to be the footprint's most significant sensitivity. Other significant sensitivities are: efficiency of the power plant; the growth (or re-growth) rate of the forest that supplies the wood; and the residue fraction of the wood. Length of the policy horizon is also an important factor in determining the footprint. The paper concludes that because of their significance and variability, baseline choices should be made very explicit in biofuel carbon footprints. - Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Four baseline types for biofuel footprinting are identified. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer One type, 'biomass opportunity cost', is defined mathematically and graphically. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Choice of baseline can dramatically affect the footprint result. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The 'no baseline' approach is not acceptable. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Choice between the other three baselines depends on the question being addressed.

OSTI ID:
22131065
Journal Information:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 37; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0195-9255
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Accounting for forest carbon pool dynamics in product carbon footprints: Challenges and opportunities
Journal Article · Thu Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2012 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22131065

High Tonnage Forest Biomass Production Systems from Southern Pine Energy Plantations
Technical Report · Mon Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · OSTI ID:22131065

Western Kentucky University Research Foundation Biodiesel Project
Technical Report · Fri Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · OSTI ID:22131065