skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of discrete and continuous thermal neutron scattering treatments in MCNP5

Abstract

The standard discrete thermal neutron S({alpha},{beta}) scattering treatment in MCNP5 is compared with a continuous S({alpha},{beta}) scattering treatment using a criticality suite of 119 benchmark cases and ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data. In the analysis, six bound isotopes are considered: beryllium metal, graphite, hydrogen in water, hydrogen in polyethylene, beryllium in beryllium oxide and oxygen in beryllium oxide. Overall, there are only small changes in the eigenvalue (k{sub eff}) between discrete and continuous treatments. In the comparison of 64 cases that utilize S({alpha},{beta}) scattering, 62 agreed at the 95% confidence level, and the 2 cases with differences larger than 3 {sigma} agreed within 1 {sigma} when more neutrons were run in the calculations. The results indicate that the changes in eigenvalue between continuous and discrete treatments are random, small, and well within the uncertainty of measured data for reactor criticality experiments. (authors)

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of Michigan, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, 2355 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (United States)
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Monte Carlo Codes Group, MS A143, PO Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
American Nuclear Society, Inc., 555 N. Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, Illinois 60526 (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
22105627
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: PHYSOR 2012: Conference on Advances in Reactor Physics - Linking Research, Industry, and Education, Knoxville, TN (United States), 15-20 Apr 2012; Other Information: Country of input: France; 12 refs.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS; BENCHMARKS; BERYLLIUM; BERYLLIUM OXIDES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CRITICALITY; EIGENVALUES; FISSION; GRAPHITE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN ISOTOPES; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; NUCLEAR DATA COLLECTIONS; POLYETHYLENES; REACTOR SAFETY; THERMAL NEUTRONS

Citation Formats

Pavlou, A. T., Brown, F. B., Martin, W. R., and Kiedrowski, B. C.. Comparison of discrete and continuous thermal neutron scattering treatments in MCNP5. United States: N. p., 2012. Web.
Pavlou, A. T., Brown, F. B., Martin, W. R., & Kiedrowski, B. C.. Comparison of discrete and continuous thermal neutron scattering treatments in MCNP5. United States.
Pavlou, A. T., Brown, F. B., Martin, W. R., and Kiedrowski, B. C.. Sun . "Comparison of discrete and continuous thermal neutron scattering treatments in MCNP5". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_22105627,
title = {Comparison of discrete and continuous thermal neutron scattering treatments in MCNP5},
author = {Pavlou, A. T. and Brown, F. B. and Martin, W. R. and Kiedrowski, B. C.},
abstractNote = {The standard discrete thermal neutron S({alpha},{beta}) scattering treatment in MCNP5 is compared with a continuous S({alpha},{beta}) scattering treatment using a criticality suite of 119 benchmark cases and ENDF/B-VII.0 nuclear data. In the analysis, six bound isotopes are considered: beryllium metal, graphite, hydrogen in water, hydrogen in polyethylene, beryllium in beryllium oxide and oxygen in beryllium oxide. Overall, there are only small changes in the eigenvalue (k{sub eff}) between discrete and continuous treatments. In the comparison of 64 cases that utilize S({alpha},{beta}) scattering, 62 agreed at the 95% confidence level, and the 2 cases with differences larger than 3 {sigma} agreed within 1 {sigma} when more neutrons were run in the calculations. The results indicate that the changes in eigenvalue between continuous and discrete treatments are random, small, and well within the uncertainty of measured data for reactor criticality experiments. (authors)},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012},
month = {Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The MCNP Radiation-Shielding Validation Suite was created to assess the impact on dose rates and attenuation factors of future improvements in the MCNP Monte Carlo code or its nuclear data libraries. However, it does not currently contain any deep-penetration cases. For this reason, a set of deep-penetration benchmarks has been investigated for possible inclusion in the Suite. Overall, the MCNP5 results match the measured values quite well. Furthermore, with the exception of Resin-F, there is no systematic trend in the ratio of calculated to measured results.
  • In order to interpret Transmission Electron Microscopy observations of superconducting vortices in anisotropic or layered materials we have found the analytical solution for the Fourier transform of the electron optical phase shift for the case of a straight vortex piercing the specimen at arbitrary angle. The layered case suffered from the shortcoming that only a limited number of pancakes; up to 7, is allowed by the discrete approach followed. Seven layers, however, are scarcely representative of the real stack of pancake vortices, especially when the core pierces the specimen at large angles with respect to the specimen normal. In fact,more » in these conditions, the pancake discrete structure may no longer be buried in the diffraction fringes of the Fresnel image. Moreover, a small number of layers is a limiting factor when more exotic vortex structures with no straight cores are investigated. This drawback has been overcome by a semi-continuous approach, where each pancake layer is considered singularly, and the discrete structure of the other pancakes is substituted by a superconducting continuous medium that carries supercurrent only parallel to the layers, as proposed by Clem and further developed by Coffey and Phipps. The solution for the vector potential has been found by Fourier methods, connecting the general solutions in the vacuum with those in the superconducting regions. The presence of a vortex in the layer is taken into account by considering the layer as an additional superconducting region of negligible thickness. Once the vector potential is found, the electron optical phase shift can be calculated by integrating the vector potential along a straight trajectory suitably chosen in order to take correctly into account the overall geometry of the experimental set-up, including a tilt of the specimen with respect to the electron beam.« less
  • A key issue during the initial start-ups of new Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) is the lack of operational data for reactor model validation. To help better understand the accuracy of the reactor analysis codes CASMO5 and SIMULATE5, higher order comparisons to MCNP5 have been performed. These comparisons are for an initial core conceptual design of the NuScale reactor. The data have been evaluated at Hot Zero Power (HZP) conditions. Comparisons of core reactivity, fuel temperature coefficient (FTC), and moderator temperature coefficients (MTC) have been performed. Comparison results show good agreement between CASMO5/SIMULATE5 and MCNP5 for the conceptual initial core design.more » (authors)« less