skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Angle performance on optima MDxt

Abstract

Angle control on medium current implanters is important due to the high angle-sensitivity of typical medium current implants, such as halo implants. On the Optima MDxt, beam-to-wafer angles are controlled in both the horizontal and vertical directions. In the horizontal direction, the beam angle is measured through six narrow slits, and any angle adjustment is made by electrostatically steering the beam, while cross-wafer beam parallelism is adjusted by changing the focus of the electrostatic parallelizing lens (P-lens). In the vertical direction, the beam angle is measured through a high aspect ratio mask, and any angle adjustment is made by slightly tilting the wafer platen prior to implant. A variety of tests were run to measure the accuracy and repeatability of Optima MDxt's angle control. SIMS profiles of a high energy, channeling sensitive condition show both the cross-wafer angle uniformity, along with the small-angle resolution of the system. Angle repeatability was quantified by running a channeling sensitive implant as a regular monitor over a seven month period and measuring the sheet resistance-to-angle sensitivity. Even though crystal cut error was not controlled for in this case, when attributing all Rs variation to angle changes, the overall angle repeatability was measured as 0.16more » Degree-Sign (1{sigma}). A separate angle repeatability test involved running a series of V-curves tests over a four month period using low crystal cut wafers selected from the same boule. The results of this test showed the angle repeatability to be <0.1 Degree-Sign (1{sigma}).« less

Authors:
;  [1]
  1. Axcelis Technologies, Inc., 108 Cherry Hill Dr, Beverly, MA 01915 (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22075718
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
AIP Conference Proceedings
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 1496; Journal Issue: 1; Conference: 19. international conference on ion implantation technology, Valladolid (Spain), 25-29 Jun 2012; Other Information: (c) 2012 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Journal ID: ISSN 0094-243X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS; 46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; ASPECT RATIO; BEAM EXTRACTION; BEAM MONITORING; BEAM MONITORS; BEAM OPTICS; BEAM PRODUCTION; CHANNELING; CRYSTALS; ELECTROSTATIC LENSES; ION BEAMS; ION IMPLANTATION; ION MICROPROBE ANALYSIS; MASS SPECTROSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; RESOLUTION

Citation Formats

David, Jonathan, and Kamenitsa, Dennis. Angle performance on optima MDxt. United States: N. p., 2012. Web. doi:10.1063/1.4766559.
David, Jonathan, & Kamenitsa, Dennis. Angle performance on optima MDxt. United States. doi:10.1063/1.4766559.
David, Jonathan, and Kamenitsa, Dennis. Tue . "Angle performance on optima MDxt". United States. doi:10.1063/1.4766559.
@article{osti_22075718,
title = {Angle performance on optima MDxt},
author = {David, Jonathan and Kamenitsa, Dennis},
abstractNote = {Angle control on medium current implanters is important due to the high angle-sensitivity of typical medium current implants, such as halo implants. On the Optima MDxt, beam-to-wafer angles are controlled in both the horizontal and vertical directions. In the horizontal direction, the beam angle is measured through six narrow slits, and any angle adjustment is made by electrostatically steering the beam, while cross-wafer beam parallelism is adjusted by changing the focus of the electrostatic parallelizing lens (P-lens). In the vertical direction, the beam angle is measured through a high aspect ratio mask, and any angle adjustment is made by slightly tilting the wafer platen prior to implant. A variety of tests were run to measure the accuracy and repeatability of Optima MDxt's angle control. SIMS profiles of a high energy, channeling sensitive condition show both the cross-wafer angle uniformity, along with the small-angle resolution of the system. Angle repeatability was quantified by running a channeling sensitive implant as a regular monitor over a seven month period and measuring the sheet resistance-to-angle sensitivity. Even though crystal cut error was not controlled for in this case, when attributing all Rs variation to angle changes, the overall angle repeatability was measured as 0.16 Degree-Sign (1{sigma}). A separate angle repeatability test involved running a series of V-curves tests over a four month period using low crystal cut wafers selected from the same boule. The results of this test showed the angle repeatability to be <0.1 Degree-Sign (1{sigma}).},
doi = {10.1063/1.4766559},
journal = {AIP Conference Proceedings},
issn = {0094-243X},
number = 1,
volume = 1496,
place = {United States},
year = {2012},
month = {11}
}