skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Human factors engineering checklists for application in the SAR process

Abstract

This technical report was produced to assist the preparers and reviewers of the human factors portions of the SAR in completing their assigned tasks regarding analysis and/or review of completed analyses. The checklists, which are the main body of the report, and the subsequent tables, were developed to assist analysts in generating the needed analysis data to complete the human engineering analysis for the SAR. The technical report provides a series of 19 human factors engineering (HFE) checklists which support the safety analyses of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) reactor and nonreactor facilities and activities. The results generated using these checklists and in the preparation of the concluding analyses provide the technical basis for preparing the human factors chapter, and subsequent inputs to other chapters, required by DOE as a part of the safety analysis reports (SARs). This document is divided into four main sections. The first part explains the origin of the checklists, the sources utilized, and other information pertaining to the purpose and scope of the report. The second part, subdivided into 19 sections, is the checklists themselves. The third section is the glossary which defines terms that could either be unfamiliar or have specific meanings withinmore » the context of these checklists. The final section is the subject index in which the glossary terms are referenced back to the specific checklist and page the term is encountered.« less

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lockheed Idaho Technologies Co., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
219283
Report Number(s):
INEL-95/0117
ON: DE96009936; TRN: 96:011327
DOE Contract Number:
AC07-94ID13223
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: Mar 1995
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
05 NUCLEAR FUELS; 22 NUCLEAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; SAFETY ANALYSIS; HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING; PRODUCTION REACTORS; RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS; US DOE; DISPLAY DEVICES; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; REMOTE HANDLING; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; COMMUNICATIONS; IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; VEHICLES; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING

Citation Formats

Overlin, T.K., Romero, H.A., and Ryan, T.G. Human factors engineering checklists for application in the SAR process. United States: N. p., 1995. Web. doi:10.2172/219283.
Overlin, T.K., Romero, H.A., & Ryan, T.G. Human factors engineering checklists for application in the SAR process. United States. doi:10.2172/219283.
Overlin, T.K., Romero, H.A., and Ryan, T.G. 1995. "Human factors engineering checklists for application in the SAR process". United States. doi:10.2172/219283. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/219283.
@article{osti_219283,
title = {Human factors engineering checklists for application in the SAR process},
author = {Overlin, T.K. and Romero, H.A. and Ryan, T.G.},
abstractNote = {This technical report was produced to assist the preparers and reviewers of the human factors portions of the SAR in completing their assigned tasks regarding analysis and/or review of completed analyses. The checklists, which are the main body of the report, and the subsequent tables, were developed to assist analysts in generating the needed analysis data to complete the human engineering analysis for the SAR. The technical report provides a series of 19 human factors engineering (HFE) checklists which support the safety analyses of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE) reactor and nonreactor facilities and activities. The results generated using these checklists and in the preparation of the concluding analyses provide the technical basis for preparing the human factors chapter, and subsequent inputs to other chapters, required by DOE as a part of the safety analysis reports (SARs). This document is divided into four main sections. The first part explains the origin of the checklists, the sources utilized, and other information pertaining to the purpose and scope of the report. The second part, subdivided into 19 sections, is the checklists themselves. The third section is the glossary which defines terms that could either be unfamiliar or have specific meanings within the context of these checklists. The final section is the subject index in which the glossary terms are referenced back to the specific checklist and page the term is encountered.},
doi = {10.2172/219283},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1995,
month = 3
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • Serious accidents and incidents occurring within the Department of Energy (DOE) will be investigated by committees including DOE trained investigators. A part of the investigation includes evaluation of management systems as they relate to the accident. The purpose of this guide is to outline, for general management, those management factors which have been found to be of importance in accident prevention. These factors will, of course, will be studied by investigating teams. The management factors have been selected, through a ten-year, world-wide consensus process, as those which individually and collectively may represent accident/incident causal factors. It is the task ofmore » the investigating board or committee to determine which of these factors are, indeed, involved in a given accident or incident. Objectives of the guide are twofold: To provide a means for accident/incident prevention by familiarizing managers with the management-related accident/incident causal factors that have been revealed in accident investigation research. To help prepare line and project managers for the investigative process by making them aware of the factors that will be investigated.« less
  • Serious accidents and incidents occurring within the Department of Energy (DOE) will be investigated by committees including DOE trained investigators. A part of the investigation includes evaluation of management systems as they relate to the accident. The purpose of this guide is to outline, for general management, those management factors which have been found to be of importance in accident prevention. These factors will, of course, will be studied by investigating teams. The management factors have been selected, through a ten-year, world-wide consensus process, as those which individually and collectively may represent accident/incident causal factors. It is the task ofmore » the investigating board or committee to determine which of these factors are, indeed, involved in a given accident or incident. Objectives of the guide are twofold: To provide a means for accident/incident prevention by familiarizing managers with the management-related accident/incident causal factors that have been revealed in accident investigation research. To help prepare line and project managers for the investigative process by making them aware of the factors that will be investigated.« less
  • Advanced control rooms will use advanced human-system interface (HSI) technologies that may have significant implications for plant safety in that they will affect the operator`s overall role in the system, the method of information presentation, and the ways in which operators interact with the system. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the HSI aspects of control rooms to ensure that they are designed to good human factors engineering principles and that operator performance and reliability are appropriately supported to protect public health and safety. The principal guidance available to the NRC, however, was developed more than ten years ago,more » well before these technological changes. Accordingly, the human factors guidance needs to be updated to serve as the basis for NRC review of these advanced designs. The purpose of this project was to develop a general approach to advanced HSI review and the human factors guidelines to support. NRC safety reviews of advanced systems. This two-volume report provides the results of the project. Volume I describes the development of the Advanced HSI Design Review Guideline (DRG) including (1) its theoretical and technical foundation, (2) a general model for the review of advanced HSIs, (3) guideline development in both hard-copy and computer-based versions, and (4) the tests and evaluations performed to develop and validate the DRG. Volume I also includes a discussion of the gaps in available guidance and a methodology for addressing them. Volume 2 provides the guidelines to be used for advanced HSI review and the procedures for their use.« less
  • This report contains a safety and human factors analysis of the Navy's heat recovery incinerator (HRI) systems. These requirements were based on current military standards and an evaluation of the HRI's at NAS, Jacksonville and NS, Mayport, Fl. The data collected were used to develop preliminary design criteria for future HRIs. The safety analysis lists specific areas where problems can occur and what should be done to prevent injury to plant personnel. The human factors design criteria section lists steps that can be taken to improve personnel and plant operating efficiency. Finally, specific problems that are occurring at NAS, Jacksonvillemore » and NS, Mayport are given.« less
  • The objective of this study is to propose standardized arrangements for controls in roof bolters. It is expected that standardized control arrangements would increase safety, minimize training requirements, and promote productivity. This report provides a human factors analysis of roof bolter controls. Preliminary standards for control design include the adoption of design criteria such as functional grouping of controls; sequencing controls according to order of operation; standardizing control motion directions; and standardizing actuation force requirements, control sizes, and interspacing. The proposed control arrangements were reviewed by roof bolter manufacturers and MSHA roof control experts; the responses were favorable.