skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Artifacts in Conventional Computed Tomography (CT) and Free Breathing Four-Dimensional CT Induce Uncertainty in Gross Tumor Volume Determination

Abstract

Purpose: Artifacts impacting the imaged tumor volume can be seen in conventional three-dimensional CT (3DCT) scans for planning of lung cancer radiotherapy but can be reduced with the use of respiration-correlated imaging, i.e., 4DCT or breathhold CT (BHCT) scans. The aim of this study was to compare delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) sizes in 3DCT, 4DCT, and BHCT scans of patients with lung tumors. Methods and Materials: A total of 36 patients with 46 tumors referred for stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumors were included. All patients underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, 4DCT, and BHCT scans. GTVs in all CT scans of individual patients were delineated during one session by a single physician to minimize systematic delineation uncertainty. The GTV size from the BHCT was considered the closest to true tumor volume and was chosen as the reference. The reference GTV size was compared to GTV sizes in 3DCT, at midventilation (MidV), at end-inspiration (Insp), and at end-expiration (Exp) bins from the 4DCT scan. Results: The median BHCT GTV size was 4.9 cm{sup 3} (0.1-53.3 cm{sup 3}). Median deviation between 3DCT and BHCT GTV size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-3.3 to 30.0 cm{sup 3}), between MidV and BHCT size was 0.2more » cm{sup 3} (-5.7 to 19.7 cm{sup 3}), between Insp and BHCT size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-4.7 to 24.8 cm{sup 3}), and between Exp and BHCT size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-4.8 to 25.5 cm{sup 3}). The 3DCT, MidV, Insp, and Exp median GTV sizes were all significantly larger than the BHCT median GTV size. Conclusions: In the present study, the choice of CT method significantly influenced the delineated GTV size, on average, leading to an increase in GTV size compared to the reference BHCT. The uncertainty caused by artifacts is estimated to be in the same magnitude as delineation uncertainty and should be considered in the design of margins for radiotherapy.« less

Authors:
 [1]; ; ; ;  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark)
  2. (Denmark)
  3. (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
21587660
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 80; Journal Issue: 5; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.036; PII: S0360-3016(10)03460-7; Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Journal ID: ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; CAT SCANNING; LUNGS; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOTHERAPY; RESPIRATION; BODY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Citation Formats

Fredberg Persson, Gitte, E-mail: gitte.persson@rh.regionh.dk, Nygaard, Ditte Eklund, Munch af Rosenschoeld, Per, Richter Vogelius, Ivan, Josipovic, Mirjana, Specht, Lena, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Korreman, Stine Sofia, Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, and Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Artifacts in Conventional Computed Tomography (CT) and Free Breathing Four-Dimensional CT Induce Uncertainty in Gross Tumor Volume Determination. United States: N. p., 2011. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.036.
Fredberg Persson, Gitte, E-mail: gitte.persson@rh.regionh.dk, Nygaard, Ditte Eklund, Munch af Rosenschoeld, Per, Richter Vogelius, Ivan, Josipovic, Mirjana, Specht, Lena, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Korreman, Stine Sofia, Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, & Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Artifacts in Conventional Computed Tomography (CT) and Free Breathing Four-Dimensional CT Induce Uncertainty in Gross Tumor Volume Determination. United States. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.036.
Fredberg Persson, Gitte, E-mail: gitte.persson@rh.regionh.dk, Nygaard, Ditte Eklund, Munch af Rosenschoeld, Per, Richter Vogelius, Ivan, Josipovic, Mirjana, Specht, Lena, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Korreman, Stine Sofia, Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, and Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Mon . "Artifacts in Conventional Computed Tomography (CT) and Free Breathing Four-Dimensional CT Induce Uncertainty in Gross Tumor Volume Determination". United States. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.036.
@article{osti_21587660,
title = {Artifacts in Conventional Computed Tomography (CT) and Free Breathing Four-Dimensional CT Induce Uncertainty in Gross Tumor Volume Determination},
author = {Fredberg Persson, Gitte, E-mail: gitte.persson@rh.regionh.dk and Nygaard, Ditte Eklund and Munch af Rosenschoeld, Per and Richter Vogelius, Ivan and Josipovic, Mirjana and Specht, Lena and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen and Korreman, Stine Sofia and Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin and Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen},
abstractNote = {Purpose: Artifacts impacting the imaged tumor volume can be seen in conventional three-dimensional CT (3DCT) scans for planning of lung cancer radiotherapy but can be reduced with the use of respiration-correlated imaging, i.e., 4DCT or breathhold CT (BHCT) scans. The aim of this study was to compare delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) sizes in 3DCT, 4DCT, and BHCT scans of patients with lung tumors. Methods and Materials: A total of 36 patients with 46 tumors referred for stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumors were included. All patients underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, 4DCT, and BHCT scans. GTVs in all CT scans of individual patients were delineated during one session by a single physician to minimize systematic delineation uncertainty. The GTV size from the BHCT was considered the closest to true tumor volume and was chosen as the reference. The reference GTV size was compared to GTV sizes in 3DCT, at midventilation (MidV), at end-inspiration (Insp), and at end-expiration (Exp) bins from the 4DCT scan. Results: The median BHCT GTV size was 4.9 cm{sup 3} (0.1-53.3 cm{sup 3}). Median deviation between 3DCT and BHCT GTV size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-3.3 to 30.0 cm{sup 3}), between MidV and BHCT size was 0.2 cm{sup 3} (-5.7 to 19.7 cm{sup 3}), between Insp and BHCT size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-4.7 to 24.8 cm{sup 3}), and between Exp and BHCT size was 0.3 cm{sup 3} (-4.8 to 25.5 cm{sup 3}). The 3DCT, MidV, Insp, and Exp median GTV sizes were all significantly larger than the BHCT median GTV size. Conclusions: In the present study, the choice of CT method significantly influenced the delineated GTV size, on average, leading to an increase in GTV size compared to the reference BHCT. The uncertainty caused by artifacts is estimated to be in the same magnitude as delineation uncertainty and should be considered in the design of margins for radiotherapy.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.036},
journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics},
issn = {0360-3016},
number = 5,
volume = 80,
place = {United States},
year = {2011},
month = {8}
}