skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain)

Abstract

Most Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) research has been concerned with SEA as a procedure, and there have been relatively few developments and tests of analytical methodologies. The first stage of the SEA is the 'screening', which is the process whereby a decision is taken on whether or not SEA is required for a particular programme or plan. The effectiveness of screening and SEA procedures will depend on how well the assessment fits into the planning from the early stages of the decision-making process. However, it is difficult to prepare the environmental screening for an infrastructure plan involving a whole country. To be useful, such methodologies must be fast and simple. We have developed two screening tools which would make it possible to estimate promptly the overall impact an infrastructure plan might have on biodiversity and global warming for a whole country, in order to generate planning alternatives, and to determine whether or not SEA is required for a particular infrastructure plan.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [2]
  1. Dept. Forest Engineering, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Montes, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
  2. TRANSyT, E.T.S. Ingenieros de Caminos, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Avda. Profesor Aranguren s/n, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
21364712
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review; Journal Volume: 30; Journal Issue: 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008; PII: S0195-9255(09)00101-2; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; DECISION MAKING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PLANNING; PRESERVATION; SPAIN; SPECIES DIVERSITY; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EUROPE; WESTERN EUROPE

Citation Formats

Garcia-Montero, Luis G., E-mail: luisgonzaga.garcia@upm.e, Lopez, Elena, E-mail: elopez@caminos.upm.e, Monzon, Andres, E-mail: amonzon@caminos.upm.e, and Otero Pastor, Isabel, E-mail: isabel.otero@upm.e. Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain). United States: N. p., 2010. Web. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008.
Garcia-Montero, Luis G., E-mail: luisgonzaga.garcia@upm.e, Lopez, Elena, E-mail: elopez@caminos.upm.e, Monzon, Andres, E-mail: amonzon@caminos.upm.e, & Otero Pastor, Isabel, E-mail: isabel.otero@upm.e. Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain). United States. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008.
Garcia-Montero, Luis G., E-mail: luisgonzaga.garcia@upm.e, Lopez, Elena, E-mail: elopez@caminos.upm.e, Monzon, Andres, E-mail: amonzon@caminos.upm.e, and Otero Pastor, Isabel, E-mail: isabel.otero@upm.e. Thu . "Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain)". United States. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008.
@article{osti_21364712,
title = {Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain)},
author = {Garcia-Montero, Luis G., E-mail: luisgonzaga.garcia@upm.e and Lopez, Elena, E-mail: elopez@caminos.upm.e and Monzon, Andres, E-mail: amonzon@caminos.upm.e and Otero Pastor, Isabel, E-mail: isabel.otero@upm.e},
abstractNote = {Most Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) research has been concerned with SEA as a procedure, and there have been relatively few developments and tests of analytical methodologies. The first stage of the SEA is the 'screening', which is the process whereby a decision is taken on whether or not SEA is required for a particular programme or plan. The effectiveness of screening and SEA procedures will depend on how well the assessment fits into the planning from the early stages of the decision-making process. However, it is difficult to prepare the environmental screening for an infrastructure plan involving a whole country. To be useful, such methodologies must be fast and simple. We have developed two screening tools which would make it possible to estimate promptly the overall impact an infrastructure plan might have on biodiversity and global warming for a whole country, in order to generate planning alternatives, and to determine whether or not SEA is required for a particular infrastructure plan.},
doi = {10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008},
journal = {Environmental Impact Assessment Review},
number = 3,
volume = 30,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010},
month = {Thu Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2010}
}
  • Habitat loss and fragmentation are major threats to biodiversity. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment are essential instruments used in physical planning to address such problems. Yet there are no well-developed methods for quantifying and predicting impacts of fragmentation on biodiversity. In this study, a literature review was conducted on GIS-based ecological models that have potential as prediction tools for biodiversity assessment. Further, a review of environmental impact statements for road and railway projects from four European countries was performed, to study how impact prediction concerning biodiversity issues was addressed. The results of the study showed the existing gapmore » between research in GIS-based ecological modelling and current practice in biodiversity assessment within environmental assessment.« less
  • The study illustrates how strategic environmental assessment (SEA) can promote sustainable development plans. It defines and applies an SEA methodology to two draft plans: the hydrological plan for the Duero basin in Spain and the irrigation plan for the region of Castilla y Leon. Although prepared by national and regional authorities, respectively, both draft plans refer to the management and use of water as a resource for economic development and refer roughly to the same area. The SEA addresses the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the combined draft plans, using relevant indicators and objectives. The analysis shows that themore » proposals would lead to high financial costs and significant negative impacts on the environment for each job created; it develops and assesses a number of alternatives that would address these impacts. The results are used to define SEA procedures for the new Structural Funds period (2000--2006) and will provide a useful lesson for plans at all levels of government within Spain.« less
  • No abstract prepared.
  • Plant hybrid zones are dynamic centers of ecological and evolutionary processes for plants and their associated communities. Studies in the wild and in gardens with synthetic crosses showed that hybrid eucalypts supports the greatest species richness and abundances of insect and fungal taxa. In an updated review of 152 case studies of taxa associated with diverse hybridizing systems, there were 43 (28%) cases of hybrids being more susceptible than their parent species, 7 (5%) resistant, 35 (23%) additive, 35 (23%) dominant, and 32 (21%) showed no response to hybridization. Thus, most taxa respond to hybrids in ways that result inmore » equal or greater abundance, and hybrids tend to accumulate the taxa of their parent species. These studies suggest that genetic-based plant traits affect the distribution of many species and that the variation in hybrids can be used as tools to examine the genetic components of community structure and biodiversity.« less
  • Biodiversity has become one of the central environmental issues in the framework of recent policies and international conventions for the promotion of sustainable development. The reduction of habitat worldwide is currently considered as the main threat to biodiversity conservation. Transportation infrastructures, and above all road networks, are blamed for highly contributing to the decrease in both the quantity and the quality of natural habitat. Therefore, a sound Biodiversity Impact Assessment (BIA) in road planning and development needs to be coupled to other commonly considered aspects. This paper presents an approach to contribute to BIA of road projects that focuses onmore » one type of impact: the direct loss of ecosystems. The first step consists in mapping the different ecosystem types, and in evaluating their relevance for biodiversity conservation. This is based on the assessment of ecosystem's rarity. Rarity is a measure of how frequently an ecosystem type is found within a given area. Its relevance is confirmed by the fact that the protection of rare ecosystems is often considered as the single most important function of biodiversity conservation. Subsequently, the impact of a road project can be quantified by spatially computing the expected losses of each ecosystem type. To illustrate the applicability of the methodology, a case study is presented dealing with the assessment of alternative routes for a highway development in northern Italy.« less