skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Viability of {delta}m{sup 2}{approx}1 eV{sup 2} sterile neutrino mixing models in light of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and antineutrino data from the Booster and NuMI beamlines

Abstract

This paper examines sterile neutrino oscillation models in light of recently published results from the MiniBooNE Experiment. The new MiniBooNE data include the updated neutrino results, including the low-energy region, and the first antineutrino results, as well as first results from the off-axis NuMI beam observed in the MiniBooNE detector. These new global fits also include data from LSND, KARMEN, NOMAD, Bugey, CHOOZ, CCFR84, and CDHS. Constraints from atmospheric oscillation data have been imposed. We test the validity of the three-active plus one-sterile (3+1) and two-sterile (3+2) oscillation hypotheses, and we estimate the allowed range of fundamental neutrino oscillation parameters in each case. We assume CPT-invariance throughout. However, in the case of (3+2) oscillations, CP violation is allowed. We find that, with the addition of the new MiniBooNE data sets, a (3+2) oscillation hypothesis provides only a marginally better description of all short-baseline data over a (3+1) oscillation hypothesis. In the case of (3+2) CP-violating models, we obtain good {chi}{sup 2}-probabilities in general due to the large number of fit parameters. However, we find large incompatibilities among appearance and disappearance experiments, consistent with previous analyses. Aside from LSND, the data sets responsible for this tension are the MiniBooNE neutrino datamore » set, CDHS, and the atmospheric constraints. In addition, new incompatibilities are found between the appearance experiments themselves (MiniBooNE, LSND, KARMEN and NOMAD), independent of CP-violation assumptions. On the other hand, fits to antineutrino-only data sets, including appearance and disappearance experiments, are found significantly more compatible, even within a (3+1) oscillation scenario.« less

Authors:
;  [1]; ;  [2];  [3]
  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (United States)
  2. Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 (United States)
  3. Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, IFIC, CSIC and Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
21325199
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 80; Journal Issue: 7; Other Information: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.073001; (c) 2009 The American Physical Society; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Journal ID: ISSN 0556-2821
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; ANTINEUTRINOS; BEAMS; CP INVARIANCE; CPT THEOREM; ELECTRON NEUTRINOS; MIXING; NEUTRINO OSCILLATION; OSCILLATIONS

Citation Formats

Karagiorgi, G, Conrad, J M, Djurcic, Z, Shaevitz, M H, and Sorel, M. Viability of {delta}m{sup 2}{approx}1 eV{sup 2} sterile neutrino mixing models in light of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and antineutrino data from the Booster and NuMI beamlines. United States: N. p., 2009. Web. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVD.80.073001.
Karagiorgi, G, Conrad, J M, Djurcic, Z, Shaevitz, M H, & Sorel, M. Viability of {delta}m{sup 2}{approx}1 eV{sup 2} sterile neutrino mixing models in light of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and antineutrino data from the Booster and NuMI beamlines. United States. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVD.80.073001.
Karagiorgi, G, Conrad, J M, Djurcic, Z, Shaevitz, M H, and Sorel, M. Thu . "Viability of {delta}m{sup 2}{approx}1 eV{sup 2} sterile neutrino mixing models in light of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and antineutrino data from the Booster and NuMI beamlines". United States. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVD.80.073001.
@article{osti_21325199,
title = {Viability of {delta}m{sup 2}{approx}1 eV{sup 2} sterile neutrino mixing models in light of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and antineutrino data from the Booster and NuMI beamlines},
author = {Karagiorgi, G and Conrad, J M and Djurcic, Z and Shaevitz, M H and Sorel, M},
abstractNote = {This paper examines sterile neutrino oscillation models in light of recently published results from the MiniBooNE Experiment. The new MiniBooNE data include the updated neutrino results, including the low-energy region, and the first antineutrino results, as well as first results from the off-axis NuMI beam observed in the MiniBooNE detector. These new global fits also include data from LSND, KARMEN, NOMAD, Bugey, CHOOZ, CCFR84, and CDHS. Constraints from atmospheric oscillation data have been imposed. We test the validity of the three-active plus one-sterile (3+1) and two-sterile (3+2) oscillation hypotheses, and we estimate the allowed range of fundamental neutrino oscillation parameters in each case. We assume CPT-invariance throughout. However, in the case of (3+2) oscillations, CP violation is allowed. We find that, with the addition of the new MiniBooNE data sets, a (3+2) oscillation hypothesis provides only a marginally better description of all short-baseline data over a (3+1) oscillation hypothesis. In the case of (3+2) CP-violating models, we obtain good {chi}{sup 2}-probabilities in general due to the large number of fit parameters. However, we find large incompatibilities among appearance and disappearance experiments, consistent with previous analyses. Aside from LSND, the data sets responsible for this tension are the MiniBooNE neutrino data set, CDHS, and the atmospheric constraints. In addition, new incompatibilities are found between the appearance experiments themselves (MiniBooNE, LSND, KARMEN and NOMAD), independent of CP-violation assumptions. On the other hand, fits to antineutrino-only data sets, including appearance and disappearance experiments, are found significantly more compatible, even within a (3+1) oscillation scenario.},
doi = {10.1103/PHYSREVD.80.073001},
journal = {Physical Review. D, Particles Fields},
issn = {0556-2821},
number = 7,
volume = 80,
place = {United States},
year = {2009},
month = {10}
}