skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Transcription factor Nrf2 mediates an adaptive response to sulforaphane that protects fibroblasts in vitro against the cytotoxic effects of electrophiles, peroxides and redox-cycling agents

Journal Article · · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
;  [1];  [2];  [3];  [3]
  1. Biomedical Research Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland (United Kingdom)
  2. Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY (United Kingdom)
  3. Center for Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577 (Japan)

Sulforaphane can stimulate cellular adaptation to redox stressors through transcription factor Nrf2. Using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as a model, we show herein that the normal homeostatic level of glutathione in Nrf2{sup -/-} MEFs was only 20% of that in their wild-type counterparts. Furthermore, the rate of glutathione synthesis following its acute depletion upon treatment with 3 {mu}mol/l sulforaphane was very substantially lower in Nrf2{sup -/-} MEFs than in wild-type cells, and the rebound leading to a {approx} 1.9-fold increase in glutathione that occurred 12-24 h after Nrf2{sup +/+} MEFs were treated with sulforaphane was not observed in Nrf2{sup -/-} fibroblasts. Wild-type MEFs that had been pre-treated for 24 h with 3 {mu}mol/l sulforaphane exhibited between 1.4- and 3.2-fold resistance against thiol-reactive electrophiles, including isothiocyanates, {alpha},{beta}-unsaturated carbonyl compounds (e.g. acrolein), aryl halides and alkene epoxides. Pre-treatment of Nrf2{sup +/+} MEFs with sulforaphane also protected against hydroperoxides (e.g. cumene hydroperoxide, CuOOH), free radical-generating compounds (e.g. menadione), and genotoxic electrophiles (e.g. chlorambucil). By contrast, Nrf2{sup -/-} MEFs were typically {approx} 50% less tolerant of these agents than wild-type fibroblasts, and sulforaphane pre-treatment did not protect the mutant cells against xenobiotics. To test whether Nrf2-mediated up-regulation of glutathione represents the major cytoprotective mechanism stimulated by sulforaphane, 5 {mu}mol/l buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) was used to inhibit glutathione synthesis. In Nrf2{sup +/+} MEFs pre-treated with sulforaphane, BSO diminished intrinsic resistance and abolished inducible resistance to acrolein, CuOOH and chlorambucil, but not menadione. Thus Nrf2-dependent up-regulation of GSH is the principal mechanism by which sulforaphane pre-treatment induced resistance to acrolein, CuOOH and chlorambucil, but not menadione.

OSTI ID:
21272577
Journal Information:
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol. 237, Issue 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.03.005; PII: S0041-008X(09)00115-X; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0041-008X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English