skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure

Abstract

Two analytical approaches are detailed for the determination of Forming Limit Diagrams (F.L.D.) and compared with experimental results. The first one is the 'Enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion EMMFC' and the second one is the 'Through-Thickness Shear Instability Criterion TTSIC'. The criteria are both written in an intrinsic analytical form and are applicable to linear and non-linear given strain paths as it occurs in any FEM codes for sheet-metal forming simulation. Finally, the two methods are complementary depending on the nature of failure and the predicted curves are in reasonable agreement with the trend of experimental results for a wide range of materials.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. INSA de Lyon, LaMCoS, 20 avenue Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne (France)
  2. MECANIUM, 66 boulevard Niels Bohr, 69603 Villeurbanne (France)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
21057024
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: AIP Conference Proceedings; Journal Volume: 907; Journal Issue: 1; Conference: 10. ESAFORM conference on material forming, Zaragoza (Spain), 18-20 Apr 2007; Other Information: DOI: 10.1063/1.2729528; (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; ALLOYS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; FAILURES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INSTABILITY; MATERIALS WORKING; METALS; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; SHEAR; SHEETS; STRAINS; THICKNESS

Citation Formats

Brunet, Michel, and Clerc, Patrice. Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure. United States: N. p., 2007. Web. doi:10.1063/1.2729528.
Brunet, Michel, & Clerc, Patrice. Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure. United States. doi:10.1063/1.2729528.
Brunet, Michel, and Clerc, Patrice. Sat . "Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure". United States. doi:10.1063/1.2729528.
@article{osti_21057024,
title = {Two Prediction Methods For Ductile Sheet Metal Failure},
author = {Brunet, Michel and Clerc, Patrice},
abstractNote = {Two analytical approaches are detailed for the determination of Forming Limit Diagrams (F.L.D.) and compared with experimental results. The first one is the 'Enhanced Modified Maximum Force Criterion EMMFC' and the second one is the 'Through-Thickness Shear Instability Criterion TTSIC'. The criteria are both written in an intrinsic analytical form and are applicable to linear and non-linear given strain paths as it occurs in any FEM codes for sheet-metal forming simulation. Finally, the two methods are complementary depending on the nature of failure and the predicted curves are in reasonable agreement with the trend of experimental results for a wide range of materials.},
doi = {10.1063/1.2729528},
journal = {AIP Conference Proceedings},
number = 1,
volume = 907,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Apr 07 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Sat Apr 07 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}